On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 04:55:14PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> markd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Indeed this is an excellent strategy - if done properly. The problem is,
> > a lot of people don't have the ability to capture all addresses in a
> > domain - and of course user-random@domain i
qmail Digest 29 Oct 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 1168
Topics (messages 51252 through 51312):
fetchmail and timers and control-dir
51252 by: romeo kienzler
51274 by: Robin S. Socha
people are definately starting to harvest emailadresses on this list...
51253 by: Martin Jesp
* Austad, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why are you such an asshole?
Jay, that is not really the point here, I think. Felix' comment was well
deserved. The ideas presented were braindead. Repeating them doesn't
make them any more useful.
> Who's the owner of this list? I'm getting sick of
Hi,
>| and if not: is there a pop-server which can do this and which works with
>| vmailmgr??
>
>I don't know about any other Maildir-aware pop3 daemon
>
>| please help, it's very important and i'm searching for such a long time
>now...
>
>Isn't it better to fire up your editor and look for sour
Big Brother tells me that Greg White wrote:
>
> That's what I thought. So, if either of the following two items is true,
> postmaster will still get the bounces:
>
> 1. The relay is not yet listed in an anti-relay domain.
>
> 2. The receiving SMTP host is not using strong anti-spam techniques
>
> Poor Jay, doesn't your Mailtoy have kill function? And speaking of
> Mailtoys, yours does not produce reference headers and your quoting is
> an abomination. You do know what you're doing the archive of this list,
> don't you? Check here:
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2
> "Jason" == Jason Brooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Has anyone actually noticed just how screwed the subject of this
thread is? :)
--
"Indeed, it would not be an exaggeration to describe the history of
the computer industry for the past decade as a massive effort to keep
up with Apple."
Hi,
I am trying to complie Qmail on my Solaris server. I need to try and get it
to use GCC to complie the files, I know I need to edit the conf-cc file but
I don't know what to add in it.
Is it just the path to gcc and nothing else?
Thanks,
Jon
Hi,
Does any know where I can download pre-complied binerys for Qmail for my
Solaris server?
Thanks,
Jon
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 12:15:19AM -0500, Jack McKinney wrote:
> Maybe. If the email is rejected AFTER being accepted by your mail
> server, then your mail server will bounce it based on the headers.
> If it is rejected at the SMTP port of your server (as is typical of
> the relay checkin
Thus said "Anthony Abby" on Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:29:41 EDT:
> Can someone point me to documentation or just tell me how I can filter out
> ALL attachements to my smtp server. I'm using Qmail solely in a listserver
> environment and I want to make sure that zero attachements get through. I'm
> ne
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:00:11 MST:
> > and have your *real* address that you give out to people who you want to
> > have a stable address be user-@domain and be careful about
> > revealing that . :)
>
> That's a good idea Russ.
It is a very good idea, however, you ha
Thus said Brett Randall on 28 Oct 2000 22:28:51 +1100:
> A better alternative, IMHO, is to use a certain anti-spam e-mail
> address (someone on this list uses it but I can't remember who) that
> only lasts like a week, and then its gone. This gives most ppl enuf
> time to reply. This won't cut do
Andy, I appreciate the advice, but I like LISTAR much better. The feature
set looks to be fuller to me than does EZMLM. All I want to do is strip out
attachements at the SMTP level. Is that possible?
Thanks
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Bradford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Thus said "Anthony Abby" on Sun, 29 Oct 2000 15:38:38 EST:
> Andy, I appreciate the advice, but I like LISTAR much better. The feature
> set looks to be fuller to me than does EZMLM. All I want to do is strip out
> attachements at the SMTP level. Is that possible?
No, it is not possible to st
is there a way to put all hosts from one domain into badmailfrom?
not all users from one host of that domain as in
@host.domain.com
but all users from all hosts of domain.com ...
> Andy
> p.s. If LISTAR has such a big feature list, why can't it do the
> stripping for you?!? ;-)
> --
It can, but I wanted to do it before the messages got handed off to the
lists. Thanks anayway.
Anthony
Hi,
Just installed qmail, and everything went well - well I think so. I tried
to send some mail though /var/qmail/bin/sendmail from a perl program and got
the following error message back -
qmail-inject: fatal: qq trouble in home directory (#4.3.0)
Any ideas what the problem is? I am using th
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 09:21:52PM -, jon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just installed qmail, and everything went well - well I think so. I tried
> to send some mail though /var/qmail/bin/sendmail from a perl program and got
> the following error message back -
>
> qmail-inject: fatal: qq trouble in hom
I have setup a qmail server and everything looks fine. DNS is setup
correctly pointing to it. There is one thing strange that I can't get mail
from Mailbox. But whenever I restart qmail daemon, those test mails that I
have sent all come in once. I can't find where they are.
Does anyone hav
> "Alan" == Alan Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> I have setup a qmail server and everything looks fine. DNS is
Alan> setup correctly pointing to it. There is one thing strange
Alan> that I can't get mail >From Mailbox. But whenever I restart
Alan> qmail daemon, those test mails
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 11:54:48AM +0900, Alan Chung wrote:
> I have setup a qmail server and everything looks fine. DNS is setup
> correctly pointing to it. There is one thing strange that I can't get mail
> from Mailbox. But whenever I restart qmail daemon, those test mails that I
> have s
Hi,
Sorry to resurrect an old thread: I've just looked through the replies,
and no-one seems to have mentioned fixcrio as an alternative solution.
This changes any incoming SMTP bare LFs into CR-LFs. I've used
it on a few systems and haven't heard any complaints yet, although
there is some debate
23 matches
Mail list logo
