Peter van Dijk writes:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 04:56:22PM -0600, Tony Harris wrote:
>> It shows NO messages.
>> I manually move the messages from new to cur, re-connect, re-issue a list
>> request, and it shows all of the messages.
>
> What are the rights and ownerships of new, cur and tmp?
>
Hi all.
When my friend set up some gateway/proxy/mailserver/whateverelse, he found
little strange thing in script file qmail.sh located @ /etc/profile.d/ in
his system (and other ones too, as we've seen later).
SNIP
if grep -q './Mailbox' /var/qmail/defaultdelivery/rc; then
MAIL="$HO
Hi,
I would like to run qmail behind NAT. The local machine is called 'galois',
with ip number 192.168.1.6. The router is locally called 'euler', and
globally is accessible by 'hypervolume.com'.
I have set up port forwarding (port 25) from euler to galois. I have ^not^
declared an MX -- do
QMTP may be faster than SMTP for sending mail, but it seems less powerful in
our spam-happy Internet era. How would one go about rejecting incoming QMTP
mail? The protocol suggests that there is no way of writing some equivalent
of rblsmtpd. The shipped qmail-qmtpd.c in qmail 1.03 doesn't even
Faried Nawaz writes:
> QMTP may be faster than SMTP for sending mail, but it seems less
> powerful in our spam-happy Internet era.
I think you mean Dan's implementation is 'less powerful'; it has nothing to
do with the protocol.
Has anyone seen spam enter their network via qmail-qmtpd?
Vi
Hi all...
Being a newbie to qmail and ldap I am wondering if there is a qmail with the
qmail-ldap patch already applied.
SF writes:
> I have access to pretty much any dist and wanted to know what the opinion is
> on the most recommended distribution... I've heard Debian, FreeBSD, etc in
> other areas, but wasn't sure.
> I intend this box to be super secure with qmail (for multiple domains) and
> bind/dns running,
dear all,
i have faced a problem regarding retreival of mails from mail browsers..
the problem is that the mails in my 'new' folder are automatically
transfered to 'cur' folder and the message id gets attached with ":2,". and it
gets appended again and again. the mails are readable using cat
qmail Digest 1 Feb 2001 11:00:00 - Issue 1262
Topics (messages 56400 through 56456):
need help
56400 by: zhonghua dai
56425 by: Ian Lance Taylor
Re: Clean out /var/qmail/queue/pid + send automatic reply
56401 by: Peter van Dijk
backup
56402 by: Takayuki Mur
You'll get a zillion different answers to this question. I won't answer it
directly, but I'll throw in my two cents on a few points.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 04:56:40PM -0600, SF wrote:
> I've been working for about 4 weeks now at setting up qmail on my RH 7.0
> box. I'm somewhat new to linux (my
Hi,
I have set up an internal mailserver based on qmail and RH6.2 behind a
firewall.
There are some security aspects in which I am not sure about.
If SMTP is opened in the firewall, the machine could easily be hacked I
assume.
Are there any recommendations how to secure smtp on qmail?
Thx!
Marc
Vincent Schonau wrote:
I think you mean Dan's implementation is 'less powerful'; it has nothing to
do with the protocol.
With SMTP, you get
S: 220 hi, it's me!
C: mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S: 551 go away
With QMTP, you get
C:
S: 7:Dgo away,
Has anyone seen spam enter their net
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:09:09AM -0800, Boris Krivulin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to run qmail behind NAT. The local machine is called 'galois',
> with ip number 192.168.1.6. The router is locally called 'euler', and
> globally is accessible by 'hypervolume.com'.
>
> I have set up port
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:53:48PM +0100, Marcus Korte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have set up an internal mailserver based on qmail and RH6.2 behind a
> firewall.
> There are some security aspects in which I am not sure about.
> If SMTP is opened in the firewall, the machine could easily be hacked I
> as
Hi, I'm running qmail on Solaris 7 (SUN Netra T1) and I am trying to
send out 500.000 e-Mails for Testing.
I setup a Remote Concurrency of 400 and have queue Directory Split + Big
Todo Server Patches.
Why are there just average of 4 concurrent qmail-remote Processes ?
How to improve it ?
--
Thanks
SYSERR(the_sender_on_the_machine): the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine. config
error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?)
Feb 1 14:56:28 yoda
sendmail[23266]: OAA23264: to=toto@the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine,
ctladdr=the_sender_on_the_machine (50011/50012), delay=00:00:00,
xdelay=00:00
Michael Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm running qmail on Solaris 7 (SUN Netra T1) and I am trying to send out
> 500.000 e-Mails for Testing. I setup a Remote Concurrency of 400 and have
> queue Directory Split + Big Todo Server Patches. Why are there just average
> of 4 concurrent qma
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:51:07PM +, Michel Boucey wrote:
>
> SYSERR(the_sender_on_the_machine): the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine. config
> error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?)
> Feb 1 14:56:28 yoda
> sendmail[23266]: OAA23264: to=toto@the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine,
> ct
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:51:07PM +, Michel Boucey wrote:
> SYSERR(the_sender_on_the_machine): the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine. config
> error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?)
> Feb 1 14:56:28 yoda
> sendmail[23266]: OAA23264: to=toto@the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine,
> ctlad
Sorry, I'm using multilog for logging.
And here is a Cut from Logs...
--
2001-02-01 16:07:00.591559500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400
2001-02-01 16:07:01.136160500 new msg 709520
2001-02-01 16:07:01.176806500 info msg 709520: bytes 5581 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 25704 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:
Michel Boucey writes:
> SYSERR(the_sender_on_the_machine): the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine. config
> error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?)
> Feb 1 14:56:28 yoda
> sendmail[23266]: OAA23264: to=toto@the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine,
> ctladdr=the_sender_on_the_machine (50011/5001
"Kris Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Incoming messages are first stored in ~/Maildir/tmp. They are only moved to
>~/Maildir/new once the file write is complete. Therefore, as long as you
>are only backing up ~/Maildir/cur and ~/Maildir/new, you shouldn't have any
>risk of incomplete file b
> How? 500,000 separate messages or one message with 500,000 recipients?
> If the former, have you tried stopping qmail-send until the messages
> are injected--and do you really need to send each recipient a
> different message?
They are seperate messages and Yes it's needed because those are
per
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:12:36PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
# > mean airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
#
# Dunno, gonna search on Google! :-)
the correct response would be 'African or European?'
--
Justin Bell
Michael Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, I'm running qmail on Solaris 7 (SUN Netra T1) and I am trying to
>send out 500.000 e-Mails for Testing.
How? 500,000 separate messages or one message with 500,000 recipients?
If the former, have you tried stopping qmail-send until the messages
are in
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:15:02PM +0100, Filip Sneppe (Yucom) wrote:
> I have set up a second mailrelay on a linux box. Mailrelaying appears to be
> working fine. However, I don't get any loggings in the logfiles. Instead,
> logging info is sent to the console that was used to start the qmail
> d
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:15:02PM +0100, Filip Sneppe (Yucom) wrote:
> I have set up a second mailrelay on a linux box. Mailrelaying appears to be
> working fine. However, I don't get any loggings in the logfiles. Instead,
> logging info is sent to the console that was used to start the qmail
> d
Michael Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How? 500,000 separate messages or one message with 500,000 recipients?
>> If the former, have you tried stopping qmail-send until the messages
>> are injected--and do you really need to send each recipient a
>> different message?
>
>They are seperate me
Justin Bell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:12:36PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
> # > mean airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
> #
> # Dunno, gonna search on Google! :-)
>
> the correct response would be 'African or European?'
>
> --
> Justin Bell
If you are Monty Python, yes! :-)
--
Mi
"dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Being a newbie to qmail and ldap
Danger, Will Robinson! qmail-ldap is not for newbies.
>I am wondering if there is a qmail with the
>qmail-ldap patch already applied.
Perhaps, but if you can't handle applying the patch, you're definitely
not ready for qmai
If security is a concern then you might not want to be running RedHat
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:53:48PM +0100, Marcus Korte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have set up an internal mailserver based on qmail and RH6.2 behind a
> firewall.
> There are some security aspects in which I am not sure about.
> If S
I have set up a second mailrelay on a linux box. Mailrelaying appears to be
working fine. However, I don't get any loggings in the logfiles. Instead,
logging info is sent to the console that was used to start the qmail
daemons.
I have the following:
[root@yuclnx2 /root]# head -25 /etc/rc.d/init.
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:56:26 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > sendmail[23266]: OAA23264: to=toto@the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine,
> > ctladdr=the_sender_on_the_machine (50011/50012), delay=00:00:00,
> > xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp,
> > relay=the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine. [xxx.xx
"Boris Krivulin wrote"
> Hi,
>
> I would like to run qmail behind NAT. The local machine is called
'galois',
> with ip number 192.168.1.6. The router is locally called 'euler', and
> globally is accessible by 'hypervolume.com'.
I have an extremely similar setup.
My router is called NS1.DOMAIN
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:03:37PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
> Justin Bell wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:12:36PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
> > # > mean airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
> > # Dunno, gonna search on Google! :-)
> > the correct response would be 'African or Europ
Just in case anyone is interested...
I have made a patch to support two features I sorely missed in ofmipd - DNS
envelope sender checking, and databytes size limiting.
I have adapted Nagy Balazs' DNS mfcheck patch to work with ofmipd, and
added qmail's databytes checking mechanism.
If anyone
Dave Sill wrote:
> OK, no need to get excited. So, have you tried stopping qmail-send
> until the messages are injected?
>
> I think you're seeing the combination of two problems: the first is
> disk bandwidth on the queue partition, and the second is the
> single-threaded nature of qmail-send: i
Steve Kennedy wrote:
> what's your favourite colour ?
>
> Steve
Blue! Uhmm... No Yellow! ;-)
--
--^..^--
michael maier - system & development administrator
flatfox ag, hanauer landstrasse 196a
d-60314 frankfurt am main
fon+49.(0)69.50
Hello
I've exactly the same problem :))
I use U60.880 with a concurrency of 3000 but no more than 50 qmail-remote
processes running
I've built a solution with 10 qmail-queues and a dispatcher using the
QMAIL-QUEUE patch
Please feel free to contact me if u want any informations
Regards
Frip'
How does one integrate msntauth with qmail smtpd?
I've downloaded the latest version of msntauth (v2.0) and have
it running on my FreeBSD machine. It appears not to be
a "checkpassword compatible" program. I'd like to be
able to call its functionality to resolve accounts with an NT
domain, as I cu
Marcus Korte writes:
> Hi,
> I have set up an internal mailserver based on qmail and RH6.2 behind a
> firewall.
> There are some security aspects in which I am not sure about.
> If SMTP is opened in the firewall, the machine could easily be hacked I
> assume.
Since you assume that, what's the f
I provide free hosting and have a large amount of users everyday. I only
have relaying from 127.0.0.1 because of I send an email out for
verification from my php signup script. I have this one issue. Someone was
trying to send 1000's of emails from a script on the web making the
machine thinking i
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:38:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a user asking about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] addressing
> scheme. I guess this would allow the user to pass foobar as a argument
> to procmail, etc. It works in sendmail.. Is this implemented in
> qmail-ldap?
Yes, the
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:46:22PM -0500, Chris McCoy wrote:
> I provide free hosting and have a large amount of users everyday. I only
> have relaying from 127.0.0.1 because of I send an email out for
> verification from my php signup script. I have this one issue. Someone was
> trying to send 10
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:04:03AM -0600, Graphic Rezidew wrote:
> If security is a concern then you might not want to be running RedHat
At least, not an unmodified RedHat. My typical post-install procedure
is to either remove or disable anything that doesn't need to be running
(in terms of netw
Hi,
I have a user asking about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] addressing
scheme. I guess this would allow the user to pass foobar as a argument
to procmail, etc. It works in sendmail.. Is this implemented in
qmail-ldap?
Regards,
Mike
Hi,
I want force to qmail to use hostname mail.ndsoftware.net.
In the qmail's configuration i have the host of my computer :( !
I have edit all files in /var/qmail/control for mail.ndsoftware.net !
My DNS loookup and the host of my computer is not mail.ndsoftware.net.
I think of edit source :))
h
OK, I'm new here, but I'll reply anyway.
Couldn't you use IPChains to filter incoming mail to you machine that says
it is from 127.0.0.1? If this is not a good idea, why?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Delany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:46:22PM -0500, Chris McCoy wrote:
> I provide free hosting and have a large amount of users everyday. I only
> have relaying from 127.0.0.1 because of I send an email out for
> verification from my php signup script. I have this one issue. Someone was
> trying to send 10
* Steve Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:03:37PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
>> Justin Bell wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:12:36PM +0100, Michael Maier wrote:
mean airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
>>> Dunno, gonna search on Google! :-)
>>> the
* Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:04:03AM -0600, Graphic Rezidew wrote:
>> If security is a concern then you might not want to be running RedHat
> At least, not an unmodified RedHat. My typical post-install procedure
> is to either remove or disable anythi
I took this message to mean that the script was a hacker located just "on
the web" trying to relay with a spoffed IP address, not a user on his own
box. If it were the latter I'd certainly start by giving the user the
boot... which is it, though? I'm just curious...
-Original Message-
Fr
Hello,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Matthew Patterson wrote:
> I know it is still very early to be asking this question,
Why early?
# mount |grep qmail
/dev/vg_3/lv_qmail on /var/qmail type reiserfs (rw)
# uname -a
Linux sjoerd 2.4.1-pre12 #5 Tue Jan 30 19:46:26 CET 2001 i686 unknown
> but here goes.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 09:03:30PM +0100, Robin S. Socha wrote:
> OK, so after the next GNOMEified update, you start from scratch.
Who puts GNOME on a server? Who puts server software on a GNOME
desktop? To my mind they're seperate. Besides, I generally ignore
updates to critical systems until
But you presumably consider it perfectly appropriate to create a
browser-bomb as your homepage and publish it to a mailing list? Given that
one might visit another's homepage as published on a list to get some
insight into the other person's personality, I guess it works.
Ok, now bag on me for t
Hi some people asked me if I could set up some sort of bsmtp service for them.
I had the idea to set up a second qmail daemon listening to a `bsmtp' ip. I
was thinking of increasing the queue lifetime a bit and run a cron every 10 minutes
which does a qmail-tcpok and sends an ALRM signal to the b
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:09:03AM +0100, Frans Haarman wrote:
> Hi some people asked me if I could set up some sort of bsmtp service for them.
>
> I had the idea to set up a second qmail daemon listening to a `bsmtp' ip. I
> was thinking of increasing the queue lifetime a bit and run a cron ever
hes gone. i just wanna prevent this in the future.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Matt Simonsen wrote:
> I took this message to mean that the script was a hacker located just "on
> the web" trying to relay with a spoffed IP address, not a user on his own
> box. If it were the latter I'd certainly start by
the QMTP spec includes:
> 8. Examples
>
>A client opens a connection and sends the concatenation of the
>following strings:
>
> "246:" <0a>
> "Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 0);"
> " 29 Jul 1996 09:36:40 -" <0a>
> "Date: 29 Jul 1996 11:35:35
I was wondering if I could get a bit of help with qmail configuration. I
didn't setup either of the servers so I am trying to find my way around a
tad blindly.
We have a qmail server as our primary mail server and it automatically
forwards email onto our Exchange server for internal users to col
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:23:07PM -0600, David L. Nicol wrote:
[snip]
> >The server sends the following response, indicating acceptance:
> >
> > "21:Kok 838640135 qp 1390,"
> > "21:Kok 838640135 qp 1391,"
> > "21:Kok 838640135 qp 1391,"
> >
> >The client closes the con
Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two recipients, two responses. Looks like a bug in the document.
There are three recipients across two messages. The first has one, the
second has two.
--
Dan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://danp.net
Hi to all,
How can i block a specific email address in qmail?
John Hamill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I would like to do, is to be able to reject mail on the qmail server
> for users who don't exist at our site. This is people who leave the company
> etc and various spammers who send to any address at our domain. Is there a
> "simple" way I can have
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, KIM wrote:
>Hi to all,
>
>How can i block a specific email address in qmail?
echo "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
echo "@another.domain.name" >> /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
--
***
Matthew H Patterson
Unix Systems Admi
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:51:51PM -0800, Dan Peterson wrote:
> Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Two recipients, two responses. Looks like a bug in the document.
>
> There are three recipients across two messages. The first has one, the
> second has two.
Thank you. That explain
My initial posting was going to make some fairly pointed comments about qmail but it
*appears* that this list server is also using that software and the problem doesn't
happen there. Anyway, on with the story ...
Some of my users have found that when they send e-mail to particular organisation
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 06:01:18PM +1100, Administrator wrote:
> My initial posting was going to make some fairly pointed comments about qmail but it
>*appears* that this list server is also using that software and the problem doesn't
>happen there. Anyway, on with the story ...
>
> Some of my
Don't know about bad PR for qmail, but it's certainly bad PR for
WebCentral/OzEmail.
Administrator writes:
> The ISP in question (WebCentral) is located in Australia and is part of the OzEmail
>group of companies (I am led to believe). They say they have 30,000 domains
>registered at their
69 matches
Mail list logo
