Possibly the reason you were "blasted" is that this is incorrect. You
_cannot_ make inetd or xinetd use tcpserver. Your xinetd script doesn't
use tcpserver; it uses tcp-env. tcp-env was originally designed to
allow you to do tcpserver-like operations from inetd, but is now
deprecated. There
Charles Cazabon wrote:
>
> You're an open relay. Stop qmail-smtpd, and change that line to
>
> :allow
>
> instead.
Hi Charles,
thanks for your advice. I changed my /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.rules to
127.0.0.1:allow
:allow
and now everything is working fine. :-)
I also reread some of that smtp
How do you get tcpserver to run the qmail-smtpd daemon? When I run it
as in the faq, it runs and I see the process running, but it doesn't
accept connections. I then changed it to use inetd using tcp-env and
qmail-smtpd accepts connections. Could someone get me starting in the
right direction?
I list some alternatives to MAPS's RBLs, along with some other
spam-prevention techniques, here:
http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html
http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html#resources
Chris
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Derek Callaway wrote:
> On T
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:45:00AM -0400, Jeff Hill wrote:
> When we e-mail a newsletter to our user list (10,000+ e-mail, twice a
> month), it holds up any other e-mail going into the send queue. What's
> the best way to avoid this?
This question has been asked and answered less than a week ago.
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 05:56:46PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:45:00AM -0400, Jeff Hill wrote:
> > When we e-mail a newsletter to our user list (10,000+ e-mail, twice a
> > month), it holds up any other e-mail going into the send queue. What's
> > the best way to avoi
Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My thanks to Lukas Beeler who asked me to run 'ps auxf' and behold!
> I found errors coming from readproctile telling me it couldn't find
> /usr/local/bin/setguidid.
[...]
> So did I 'fat finger' setguidid somewhere in a script or did my daemonto
Please quote properly; your original text was after a sig delimiter, and
you had no attribution for my text.
I wrote:
> > There are precisely zero advantages to using inetd/xinetd in this
> > manner, and several disadvantages (when compared to a simple
> > tcpserver installation).
[EMAIL PROTEC
Charlie Chrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you get tcpserver to run the qmail-smtpd daemon? When I run it
> as in the faq, it runs and I see the process running, but it doesn't
> accept connections. I then changed it to use inetd using tcp-env and
> qmail-smtpd accepts connections. Co
>On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:41:29AM -0200, MassimoQuintini wrote:
>>For security reason, can I disable shell in /etc/passwd for qmail >users
>>(qmails, qmaill, ...ect,) setting the shell to /bin/false ?
>
>/bin/false is a very silly idea. /nonexistent is much better.
>
>Greetz, Peter.
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 04:28:51PM +, pop corn wrote:
[snip]
> >/bin/false is a very silly idea. /nonexistent is much better.
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> This is a post that I pulled out from the archives. I think /nonexistent
> does seem better than /bin/false.
It is. /nonexistent has no security i
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 04:28:51PM +, pop corn wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 09:41:29AM -0200, MassimoQuintini wrote:
> >>For security reason, can I disable shell in /etc/passwd for qmail >users
> >>(qmails, qmaill, ...ect,) setting the shell to /bin/false ?
> >
> >/bin/false is a very s
-Original Message-
> From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > So did I 'fat finger' setguidid somewhere in a script or did my
> daemontools
> > install fail and I just didn't realize it? Or is there another problem?
>
> It's "setuidgid", not "setguidgid".
Yeah, people keep tel
First of all, I'm on the list, and I set Mail-Followup-To:
appropriately. Please don't cc: me on your list messages; I hate
duplicates and get 500-1000 messages a day already.
Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It's "setuidgid", not "setguidgid".
>
> Yeah, people keep telling me
> The /nonexistent is meant to be the user's shell, not his home.
You and Peter are absolutely correct. I lost my train of thought as I was
typing out that question. Sorry!
Thanks for the fast response. I hadn't created /nonexistent, but wanted to
be sure that I wasn't overlooking something.
Basically what I am needing to get back to is this scenario All of the domain names
are representative names and do not reflect the real thing in my test lab.
I have a client using my qmail server for outgoing smtp.
1) If I address the user as [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want the message
delivered to
Cordell Bourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically what I am needing to get back to is this scenario All of
> the domain names are representative names and do not reflect the real
> thing in my test lab.
Please don't do this; it wastes everybody's time. Use real names or IP
addresses. Obvio
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 1:52 PM
> First of all, I'm on the list, and I set Mail-Followup-To:
> appropriately. Please don't cc: me on your list messages; I hate
> duplicates and get 500-1000 messages a day al
Gadzooks In my previous reply to Charles Cazabon
I was IMPRECISE. My rcpthosts file is NOT blank,
it has localhost in it.
Just wanted to clear that up before Charles could retort :)
Scott Zielsdorf
Senior Technical Support Consultant
Computer Instruments
9901 W. 87th St.
Overland Park, KS 66
Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please don't cc: me on your list messages [...]
>
> While learning anything necessarily about linux or qmail from
> you may be dubious, I will definitely learn perfection :)
>
> My humblest apologies that I failed to remove your personal
> address
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 6:26 PM
> Despite the smiley, that first paragraph sounds supiciously insulting.
> And why are you trying to turn this into a dicksize war?
Oh, Charles...I'm feeling impetuous. Pleas
My qmail server is jester.pain.teamp.com (In my former messages this was
hostname.somedomain.com)
When my client is using the qmail mta for outgoing smtp, I want the mail messages
to stay on jester.pain.teamp.com, if they are addressed as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I want is th
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 07:03:36PM -0600, Cordell Bourne wrote:
> When my client is using the qmail mta for outgoing smtp, I want the mail messages
> to stay on jester.pain.teamp.com, if they are addressed as
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add pain.teamp.com to .../control/locals.
Tim
Thanks that worked!
Tim Legant wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 07:03:36PM -0600, Cordell Bourne wrote:
> > When my client is using the qmail mta for outgoing smtp, I want the mail messages
> > to stay on jester.pain.teamp.com, if they are addressed as
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been running qmail/vpopmail/sqwebmail forever. I have it running
off mysql. I have about 70 domains added and have been doing the
samething forever without a problem. That's why this confuses me;
I added a new domain and I initially had the mail bouncing 5.4.6 (even after
I hup'd) .. so th
25 matches
Mail list logo
