.
__
David Villeger
(212) 673 6100 ext 264
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
At 08:48 AM 10/18/99 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 18 October 1999 at 09:21:03 +0100
I copied the qmail installation basically by doing:-
cp -R /oldvar/qmail/* /var/qmail
Okay, that makes sense. I'm in the habit of using "cp -a" when I try
to
At 06:17 PM 10/17/99 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Todd A. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 17 October 1999 at 15:43:35
-0700
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Check the permissions on /var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger. They
should look like
this:
prw--w--w-
t root tar will use the current
umask with the -x option).
Maybe (needs to be checked) installing qmail as a user different from root
has the same impact.
David.
______
David Villeger
(212) 673 6100 ext 264
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
.
__
David Villeger
(212) 673 6100 ext 264
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
(your formating is really annoying).
This issue has been explained already multiple times:
qmail preserves the case during SMTP transaction, as it is specified in the
RFC.
However, the RFC leaves freedom to the final delivery agent to have its own
case policy.
so:
- qmail doesn't violate any
fastmail?
__
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
?
Check out qmail-qmqpc and qmail-qmqpd.
David.
__
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
globally and
permanently either at boot time or on the fly. This depends on the OS you use.
David.
__
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
is 8 bit wide, so
the max number it holds is 255.
Of course, there are some solutions (several qmail instances, rewrite a
specialized qmail-send,...)
David.
__
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
At 03:44 PM 8/3/99 -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
David Villeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even with more than 1024 file descriptors, you can't have concurrencyremote
go over 256 without patching qmail.
You're right, I was confusing two issues: the concurrency remote limit
and insufficient file
this problem before?
Thanks again.
David.
______
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
emails a minute? What are qlogtools and qfilelog?
David
__
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
At 06:33 PM 7/19/99 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 07:24:41PM -0400,
David Villeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Return-Path is added by the *final* transport system. So why is it added by
qmail-inject?
Are you sure about that? The man page indicates that it deletes
RFC822?
Thanks.
David.
__
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
At 03:07 PM 5/5/99 -0500, Fred Lindberg wrote:
What happens when qmail-send is killed, as e.g. a routine shutdown
while qmail-remote is hanging onto clients?
It appears that qmail-remote completes the delivery, but has nobody to
tell it did so, resulting in duplications.
Is this really what
At 03:57 PM 5/5/99 -0500, Fred Lindberg wrote:
[...]
Would it be more correct for qmail-send to kill it's children upon
receiving sigterm?
I now use qmail-remote directly in some of my programs and it is exactely
the way I do it: the programs catch the TERM signal, kill() all children
and
it.
Same here: no patch, no smtp routes,... 100,000 emails to AOL every day and
no problems!
We use BIND 8 on Solaris 2.6
David.
__
David Villeger
(212) 972 2030 x34
http://www.CheetahMail.com
The Internet Email Publishing Solution
Hi.
I'm curious, why do you guys use qmail with ListServ, and not LSMTP?
Specifically, did you find qmail to be faster?
David.
At 04:16 PM 4/16/99 -0400, Swanson, Scott wrote:
This took me a little while to get right. I use listserv 1.8d and qmail.
rcpthosts has all my usual aliases:
Hi Dirk,
I tried the no_fsync method last night and recorded a 10% speed improvement.
At 07:27 AM 4/9/99 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 08:44:06AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
When you're sending messages, how many qmail-remotes are running?
About 90-130. 255 if I stop
not notice any significant improvement.
Then, I did it with qmail-queue: qmail-send did not like it (got something
like "Sorry, message has wrong owner"). I never got to investigate (I
recall the problem was in spawn.c though).
David.
______
David Villeger
At 05:13 PM 4/8/99 -0400, David Villeger wrote:
Then, I did it with qmail-queue: qmail-send did not like it (got something
like "Sorry, message has wrong owner"). I never got to investigate (I
recall the problem was in spawn.c though).
I just tried it again (I thought this was
Hi.
A few weeks back I heard someone saying that qmail 2 will have a completely
different queue structure (the thread was about file names being i-node
numbers).
so:
- when will qmail 2 be released?
- what other changes will it incorporate?
- any other info about it?
- how do people who know
At 08:55 AM 3/3/99 +0100, Balazs Nagy wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999 at 05:43:52PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
AFAIK, it's something about the concurrency variable being 8 bits long, and
8 bits allow 256 possible values (from 0-255).
there's in
At 07:57 AM 2/1/99 +1100, Mark Delany wrote:
At 03:35 PM 1/31/99 -0500, David Villeger wrote:
- event though the concurrencyremote is set to 120, the number of
qmail-remote never gets higher than 40. If some other program runs at the
same time (like a bouncer handler, or a mail generator
25 matches
Mail list logo
