Re: End of the qmail era?

Hello Magnus On 01-Apr-01, you wrote: > > > > > /magnus > > -- > http://x42.com/ > Come on people, it's dated April the 1st. Regards...Martin -- --- A "critic" is a person who creates nothing and thereby feels q

Re: OK I give up!!!

Hello Kurth On 09-Mar-01, you wrote: > > yeppers - you forgot to read life with qmail. :-) > > >> Thanks for everybody's help. All of you folks are very helpful. > > thats why were here :-) > > > >> Kirti Don't just read it, print it out !!! Install it from source as per the direction

Re: (OT) DJB-itization

Hello Carl On 21-Feb-01, you wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 07:10:52AM -0500, [gill] wrote: >> >> Is there a better list to discuss this than the qmail list? >> > Perhaps misc? [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --Carl-- > http://slackerbsd.org Yes, I mentioned this to DJB as well. I think I said advoc

Re: SOMEONE GET ME OFF THIS LIST

Hello Henry On 29-Jan-01, you wrote: > haha. i sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] a few times > but i'm still getting mail messages from the list server > > :-) > > -henry The same account as your using to post now ? Your not multiple subscribed ? Anyone can post to this list whether they

Re: rblsmtpd

Hello Mate On 29-Jan-01, you wrote: >> I did note in the earlier mail that rblsmtpd is now in the ucspi-tcp >> program and has a -a query. The only thing about this is why it >> says "anti-listed" instead of listed. > > > Perhaps you want to read the docs for rblsmtpd for the meaning of the >

Re: rblsmtpd

Hello Peter On 25-Jan-01, you wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:06:58PM -0500, Martin Randall wrote: > [snip] >> Whilst I'm hereI noticed that most mail servers connecting have >> cutomised greetings and endings during the 220, 250 and 221 responses. I >>

Re: rblsmtpd

Hello Chris On 25-Jan-01, you wrote: > > I think this last entry requires a patched rbslmptd. You could instead > use: > > -r relays.msci.memphis.edu > > relays.msci.memphis.edu is a mirror of relays.mail-abuse.org, but it runs > Dan's rbldns and gives out the TXT record that rblsmtpd needs.

Re: unable to read tcp.smtp.cdb: protocol error

Hello Martin On 19-Jan-01, you wrote: >>> No /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb >>> >>> Where do I go from here ? >> >> Did you skip the step where you do: >> >> /usr/local/sbin/qmail cdb >> >> -Dave >> > > No, did that twice. When I did a vi /etc/tcp.smtp I found two identical > entries of 127.:allow,RELA

Re: unable to read tcp.smtp.cdb: protocol error

Hello Dave On 19-Jan-01, you wrote: >> >> >> /etc >> >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 52 Jan 19 04:39 tcp.smtp >> >> No /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb >> >> Where do I go from here ? > > Did you skip the step where you do: > > /usr/local/sbin/qmail cdb > > -Dave > No, did that twice. When I d

unable to read tcp.smtp.cdb: protocol error

Hello. This is a new install on OpenBSD V2.8 following LWQ...thanks Dave. Fixed one problem by getting a hint from the searchable archive, thanks again Dave Sill, there is some info on this problem there, but not enough to fix it or know WHY it has happened. Looking for a clue here :-) How do

Re: A firestorm of protest?

Hello qmailers :-) Let's just leave it as it is and if you want to call them something, then qmail non-standard extensions. I'm sure Dan is concerned that these extensions can introduce security concerns, not because of your programming, but the environments they will be working in/with. Perha

Re: tcpserver

Hello Kris On 15-Jan-01, you wrote: >> >> I take it a .qmail file is also required in /etc/skel. > > Not really. If all of your users require the same delivery instructions, > then those instructions should be part of qmail-start's "defaultdelivery" > argument, presumably in the /var/qmail/

Re: tcpserver

Hello Charles On 15-Jan-01, you wrote: > > Probably there isn't a Maildir in the skeleton directory. The qmail > install will not put one there by default. > > Besides, adding a Maildir to /etc/skel (go ahead, do this yourself) won't > affect existing user directories; you'll have to add a Mai

Re: tcpserver

Hello James On 15-Jan-01, you wrote: > > Perhaps, but there's more scope for confusion. The INSTALL* docs in the > qmail tarball and LWQ do not describe the same installation process. You > will have a different setup depending on which you follow so switching > between them is likely to cause

Re: tcpserver

So should this - sorry I'm stressed out -- Hello James On 15-Jan-01, you wrote: >> >> you didn't put that line into inetd.conf, did you? > > Well that's a useful reply. Sheesh. > > Anyways, Martin, that shouldn't go into /etc/inetd.conf. That line > should go into yo

Re: tcpserver

This should have gone to the list. -- Hello joshua On 15-Jan-01, you wrote: > Martin Randall wrote: >> o.k. - it says "remove smtp from /etc/inetd.conf" - no way. Remmed it >> out. >> >> put line :- >> >> tcpserver

tcpserver

Hello. I have a basic qmail installation following the install notes from the tarball. I have decided to add all the other djb programs so it will be a djbware machine. Passes all the test and works fine out of inetd. Added checkpassword and set-up pop3d. All tested and works fine. Oh, two ques

RE: CST17030532ID - OK so I eat spam (fwd) (fwd)

*** Begin of forwarded message *** Date: 08-Oct-00 12:05:58 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: CST17030532ID - OK so I eat spam (fwd) --- Forwarded message follows --- Hello marrandy, Thank you for writing to MSN Hotmail. We have closed the account in question because of

Re: What programming language to use with qmail?

Hello Thomas On 05-Aug-00, you wrote: > Let me rephrase my question about building an e-commerce app for PayPal. > > I want incoming e-mail to activate a program that looks at what's in the > e-mail, then does something (e-mailing a file) in response to what is in > the e-mail. > > My hosting

Failure to add groups etc via VIPW OpenBSD V2.6

Hello. This may be just a OpenBSD problem...I'm not sure. When I add this and try and write, it says it is corrupted, but for the life of me, I can't see why. Anyone else with OpenBSD ? Regards...Martin -- --- All of the chaos makes perfect sense.

Second mail server

Hello. I want to run a second mail server. I'm curious of how you do this. I know about the MX, but if the accounts are on the primary mail server, and it goes down, how do you ensure the the accounts and mail are duplicated on the second sever. Does that make sense ? Regards...Martin -- -

dans web site at cr.yp.to

Hello. I wanted to look at Dan's web pages linking from the qmail.org site. I get nothing back from clicking on the links. Tried with two ISP's. It was working last week. What's going on ? Regards...Martin -- --- (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail? Microsoft

dans web site at cr.yp.to

Hello. The site is back now although I haven't received the original mail yet. Perhap's the were down ? Martin --- I wanted to look at Dan's web pages linking from the qmail.org site. I get nothing back from clicking on the links. Tried with two ISP's. It was wo

Re: HTML mail considered harmful

Hello Scott On 12-Apr-00, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > (1) I complained about a guy's 17 line signature that could > be compressed down to 4 lines... he complained about my 9 > line PGP signature. clue. > > (2) I have already seen html email that has jabbascript tha

Off-topic, but I've been curious about this for a long time

Hello. What is the difference between mail sent from my masqueraded/NAT server to my ISP's mail server and my MUA masqueraded/NAT mail to their server ? I'm wondering as the server is now getting '550 relaying to user is not allowed' , but when I send the same mail from the mua it does go ou

Re: Encryption and t-shirts

Hello Dave On 25-Feb-00, you wrote: > > Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail" > Back: "Send mail with qmail" > That ones great. You going to put that in the public domain so people can reproduce it ? Regards...Martin -- --- A man of genius makes no mistakes. His er

Re: workaround for port 25 block? (fwd)

Hello Brian No need to send to me as well. I'm on the list. On 05-Feb-00, you wrote: > hi, > > actually those rules are very regional. Damn (excuse my French), I'm in the wrong region then. Tampabay is a pain. > In Rochester it is not against the > AUP to run web servers, ftp, game serv

Re: workaround for port 25 block? (fwd)

Aack...went to Aaron and not the list. *** Begin of forwarded message *** Date: 05-Feb-00 00:09:32 From: Martin Randall Hello Aaron On 04-Feb-00, you wrote: > Quoting Racer X ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> if you mean the ISP blocks inbound port 25 connections to your machine: yell >&

Re: spammer lurking

Hello Jim On 28-Jan-00, you wrote: > This list is definitely being used to harvest e-mail addresses. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Are two of the addresses from which I supposedly received mail on this > address, which obviously I only used for subscription to this list.