Robert J. Adams writes:
> Is it possible to setup AutoTURN so that the user doesn't have to have a
> static IP?
ETRN and AutoTURN are designed for static IP addresses.
If you have a program that reliably maps dynamic IP addresses to
accounts, you can use that program with AutoTURN; but this is u
Robert J. Adams writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to setup AutoTURN so that the user doesn't have to have a
> static IP? So far that's the only downside I've seen.
Better to use Anand's turnmail script. http://www.qmail.org/turnmail.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.co
arch 18, 1999 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: ETRN, qmail-1.03 and etrn patch v0.1f
>On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 12:10:31PM +, Petr Novotny wrote:
>
>> That's one part of the truth. The rest is that for
>> maildir/maildir2smtp you need to know _in advance_ for which domains
>> you h
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 12:10:31PM +, Petr Novotny wrote:
> That's one part of the truth. The rest is that for
> maildir/maildir2smtp you need to know _in advance_ for which domains
> you have this feature. ETRN is much more democratic - every domain
> for which you have the mail in queue
> I've read the page about etrn, and I think the author made some
> mistakes (at least on his first page, I'm saying anything about the
> code).
[snip]
> This solution of etrn relies on the fact that all mail
> should stay in a queue. But why? In a maildir, you've much more
> control about the s
w Spencer[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 9:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ETRN, qmail-1.03 and etrn patch v0.1f
>
> This is the first time I've posted to the list, so if I've missed
> something, kindly let me know...
&
Disregard...
UNIX 101:
Don't bypass make install lightly...
:)
-Andrew
Andrew Spencer wrote:
> This is the first time I've posted to the list, so if I've missed
> something, kindly let me know...
> I checked the FAQ but didn't find anything...
>
> This is concerning the etrn solution I found
This is the first time I've posted to the list, so if I've missed
something, kindly let me know...
I checked the FAQ but didn't find anything...
This is concerning the etrn solution I found at this URL:
http://www.cqc.com/~pacman/projects/qmail-etrn/
I am currently using a P90/Redhat 5.2 test st
