On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 12:21:23AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> the same IP-address, with the consequence, that the reverse-mapping
> 1.2.3.4 PTR will point to just one of the n hosts. What's the general
> opinion on how "legal" this is?
This is perfectly legal.
But you can also
4 IN
Hi,
> Create a file called e.g. "virtualdomains":
> ...
> zone "virtual1.com" in { type master; file "virtualdomains"; }
Nice solution for not having to have n instances of the same stuff.
One thing still bothers me. This gets me n hosts with an A mapping to
the same IP-address, with the cons
Hi,
> > Is there any other solution which avoid mapping of multiple domains to
> > the same IP-address and is legal?
> No. Well, yes, map multiple domains each to its own IP address.
Given you have enough IP-addresses. When is the big switch to IPv6 gonna
take place ?
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 02:08:48AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any other solution which avoid mapping of multiple domains to
> the same IP-address and is legal?
If these are kinda "minimal" domains and they're all identical, you can do
something like this:
(this assumes you are usi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there any other solution which avoid mapping of multiple domains to
> the same IP-address and is legal?
No. Well, yes, map multiple domains each to its own IP address.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free soft
Hi,
> ...
> mail and web services for a number of virtual domains. Thus for each
> ss that and is nevertheless correct?uch domain I have
> ...
I'm not only too dumb to understand DNS, but also to use an editor. This
should say
> ...
> mail and web services for a number of virtual domains. Th
Hi,
> > domain.com MX 25 smtp.domain.com
> > domain.com CNAME www.domain.com
> a CNAME entry may have no other ressource records or I'll get errors
That interests me too. Let's say I've got server.xy.ch which provides
mail and web services for a number of virtual domains. Thus for each
ss that
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 08:25:12PM +, Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> using:
> domain.com MX 25 smtp.domain.com
> domain.com CNAME www.domain.com
Repeat this a 100 times:
a CNAME entry may have no other ressource records or I'll get errors
"has CNAME and other data (invalid)"
which I can
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 07:53:26AM -0500, Sam wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Einar Bordewich wrote:
>
> > Does a mailserver always look at the MX record, and not the A record
> > for a domain?
>
> Yes.
I never had troubles with A Records pointing to something different then
MX-Records. But I had
Einar Bordewich writes:
> : > Back a few years, I know we had a problem related to mail going to the
> : > webserver instead the mailserver, when the domain was set up with an A
> : > record that was different than the IP address of the hostname pointed
> : > to by MX. Does this still count, o
IL PROTECTED]
---
- Original Message -
From: Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Qmail-mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record
: On Mon, 22 Nov 199
Does a mailserver always look at the MX record, and not the A record for a domain?
Back a few years, I know we had a problem related to mail going to the webserver
instead the mailserver, when the domain was set up with an A record that was different
than the IP address of the hostname pointed t
12 matches
Mail list logo
