Re: Postfix license

1999-03-21 Thread Wietse Venema
Russell Nelson: > Wietse Venema writes: > > > The license also gives IBM special rights over all enhancements to the > > > IBM Secure Mailer. If you distribute an IBM Secure Mailer add-on, for > > > example, then IBM can turn your add-on into an IBM commercial product > > > without your permis

Re: Postfix license

1999-01-06 Thread I. Dwayne Koonce
Wietse Venema corrected me on this off-list. We can probably stop CC'ing him.) > Hmm, this is from the Postfix license: > [excerpts deleted] Yes, I stand corrected. I haven't read through the whole license yet, but

Re: Postfix license

1999-01-06 Thread Lars Balker Rasmussen
uot;released under a free > license", but I don't find this to be the case. If Postfix has been > released, then its license is non-free. If the Alphaworks license is > temporary, then Postfix hasn't made it to the "release" stage. Hmm, this is from the Postfix lice

Re: Postfix license

1999-01-06 Thread I. Dwayne Koonce
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Wietse Venema wrote: > > The license also gives IBM special rights over all enhancements to the > > IBM Secure Mailer. If you distribute an IBM Secure Mailer add-on, for > > example, then IBM can turn your add-on into an IBM commercial product > > without your permission. > >

Re: Postfix license

1999-01-06 Thread Russell Nelson
Wietse Venema writes: > > The license also gives IBM special rights over all enhancements to the > > IBM Secure Mailer. If you distribute an IBM Secure Mailer add-on, for > > example, then IBM can turn your add-on into an IBM commercial product > > without your permission. > > Excuse me for

Postfix license

1999-01-06 Thread Wietse Venema
> The license also gives IBM special rights over all enhancements to the > IBM Secure Mailer. If you distribute an IBM Secure Mailer add-on, for > example, then IBM can turn your add-on into an IBM commercial product > without your permission. Excuse me for breaking into a conversation in order t