Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-30 Thread Paul Jarc
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So for safety, you either have to mount the filesystem with synchonous metadata (as I said above), But AIUI, you can't mount the filesystem so that *only* metadata is synchronous. The sync option makes *all* operations synchronous, so performance

Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
Paul Jarc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So for safety, you either have to mount the filesystem with synchonous metadata (as I said above), But AIUI, you can't mount the filesystem so that *only* metadata is synchronous. The sync option makes *all* operations synchronous, so performance

Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread James R Grinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to get a bit of advice on this one. I know that NFS is a big no-no when using qmail due to the way it handles the queue. I also know that qmail may have trouble with certain journaling filesystems (for example, reiserfs) because qmail assumes that link()

Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Charles Cazabon
James R Grinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ie. semantics that local Unix filesystems are supposed to conform to (but which Reiserfs apparently doesn't). I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS site which makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with

Re: Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Alex Kramarov
---Original Message--- Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS sitewhich makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with

Re: Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Charles Cazabon
Alex Kramarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS site which makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with synchronous metadata. The patch info says : Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is unreliable under

Re: Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 04:44:55PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote: [snip] Is this really true, about EXT2 being unreliable as well ? Yes. Greetz, Peter.

Re: Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Bruce Guenter
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:52:01AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: So for safety, you either have to mount the filesystem with synchonous metadata (as I said above), or have your program sync the directory of a file after syncing the file. Bruce Guenter's SRPM of qmail includes a patch which

Qmail and GFS

2001-01-25 Thread msteele
also know that qmail may have trouble with certain journaling filesystems (for example, reiserfs) because qmail assumes that link() and unlink() are syncronous operations (according to the reiserfs FAQ). So my question boils down to, has anyone ever tried using qmail and GFS? I've been following the ma