Hello,
> It would, eg, be handy if the followup surveys were reported and whether
> there was a trend that indicated increasing or decreasing change. Clearly
> with just two sample points no such conclusion can be drawn.
smtp-19990117.html: 2731 53.33 Sendmail
smtp-19990216.html: 3399 53.24
At 06:36 PM 8/12/99 -0600, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> Which is no more valid a data point than any other single observation,
>> but since Ben is explicitly assuming that other people's experience is
>> the same as his (which we all do, and is the right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Which is no more valid a data point than any other single observation,
> but since Ben is explicitly assuming that other people's experience is
> the same as his (which we all do, and is the right assumption in t
B. Bogart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 10 August 1999 at 21:49:22 -0700
> I have to put my two cents in here. Everyone seems impressed that InterNIC uses
> qmail. It has been mentioned repeatedly that their mail is important and cannot
> afford to be late. In my experience mail from InterNI
Daniluk, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Plus that doesn't count the 35 million customers that they send mass
> mailings to (minus those who checked no).
The parenthetical qualification is a lovely thought, but unfortunately
isn't particularly well-reflected in reality.
> They have to reall
B. Bogart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Of course, this is based on my own experience. I can only assume that others
> have had similar experiences. Although it is possible that I am the only one
> who has these problems, it does not seem likely.
Internic has caused a fair amount of pain and su
t; From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 2:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Infamous internic
>
> Cris Daniluk writes:
> > I don't know if people are aware of thi (as I dont know that I've heard
> it
&g
At 05:31 PM Thursday 8/12/99, Russell Nelson wrote:
>Daniluk, Chris writes:
> > I think it is quite a big surprise :) When 80% of the world uses
> Sendmail...
>
>According to Dan's latest survey
>(http://pobox.com/~djb/surveys/smtpsoftware3.txt),
>(which isn't very "latest"), it's now down to 6
Daniluk, Chris writes:
> I think it is quite a big surprise :) When 80% of the world uses Sendmail...
According to Dan's latest survey (http://pobox.com/~djb/surveys/smtpsoftware3.txt),
(which isn't very "latest"), it's now down to 63%.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.co
At 04:46 PM Thursday 8/12/99, Daniluk, Chris wrote:
...
>mail can't afford to be late, because of the nature of what they do. I think
>it may be good to put up a list of sites such as this that use qmail.
>Hotmail and InterNIC both are very large volume sites and it's a good answer
>to "Who uses
ume sites and it's a good answer
to "Who uses qmail anyway?" which was asked of us quite often while we began
to migrate to it.
Cris Daniluk
MicroStrategy
-Original Message-
From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 2:00 PM
To: [EMAI
Cris Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 12 August 1999 at 02:12:08 +
> I don't know if people are aware of thi (as I dont know that I've heard it
> before), but it appears InterNIC users qmail for some or all of their
> mail, based on email headers which I've viewed. Can anyone else conf
Cris Daniluk writes:
> I don't know if people are aware of thi (as I dont know that I've heard it
> before), but it appears InterNIC users qmail for some or all of their
> mail, based on email headers which I've viewed. Can anyone else confirm
> this? If so, this is a pretty significant qmail
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 02:12:08AM +, Cris Daniluk wrote:
> I don't know if people are aware of thi (as I dont know that I've heard it
> before), but it appears InterNIC users qmail for some or all of their
> mail, based on email headers which I've viewed. Can anyone else confirm
> this? If s
14 matches
Mail list logo
