Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-30 Thread Paul Jarc
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So for safety, you either have to mount the filesystem with synchonous metadata (as I said above), But AIUI, you can't mount the filesystem so that *only* metadata is synchronous. The sync option makes *all* operations synchronous, so performance

Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-30 Thread Charles Cazabon
Paul Jarc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So for safety, you either have to mount the filesystem with synchonous metadata (as I said above), But AIUI, you can't mount the filesystem so that *only* metadata is synchronous. The sync option makes *all* operations synchronous, so performance

Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread James R Grinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to get a bit of advice on this one. I know that NFS is a big no-no when using qmail due to the way it handles the queue. I also know that qmail may have trouble with certain journaling filesystems (for example, reiserfs) because qmail assumes that link()

Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Charles Cazabon
James R Grinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ie. semantics that local Unix filesystems are supposed to conform to (but which Reiserfs apparently doesn't). I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS site which makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with

Re: Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Alex Kramarov
---Original Message--- Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS sitewhich makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with

Re: Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Charles Cazabon
Alex Kramarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS site which makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with synchronous metadata. The patch info says : Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is unreliable under

Re: Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 04:44:55PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote: [snip] Is this really true, about EXT2 being unreliable as well ? Yes. Greetz, Peter.

Re: Re: Qmail and GFS

2001-01-26 Thread Bruce Guenter
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:52:01AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: So for safety, you either have to mount the filesystem with synchonous metadata (as I said above), or have your program sync the directory of a file after syncing the file. Bruce Guenter's SRPM of qmail includes a patch which