On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've temporary created this unknows user, but how can I stop
> this? I can't remove the domain of my list of virtual domains
> because there are more then 100 valid users to this domain...
I find a bit of detective work never goes astra
Hello,
I have been having exactly the same problem. I solved it
by creating an empty ~alias/.qmail-default file. After this, my server
accepts (and immediately forgets) all error messages comming to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Petr
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:37:37PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
>What I found has helped a lot in this situation are the "badrcptpatterns"
>and "badrcptto" patch that are part of the spamcontrol patch available at
>http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmail_en.html
We get people using one of our domains
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 12:15:19AM -0500, Jack McKinney wrote:
> Maybe. If the email is rejected AFTER being accepted by your mail
> server, then your mail server will bounce it based on the headers.
> If it is rejected at the SMTP port of your server (as is typical of
> the relay checkin
Big Brother tells me that Greg White wrote:
>
> That's what I thought. So, if either of the following two items is true,
> postmaster will still get the bounces:
>
> 1. The relay is not yet listed in an anti-relay domain.
>
> 2. The receiving SMTP host is not using strong anti-spam techniques
>
Jack McKinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Big Brother tells me that Greg White wrote:
>> I am a spammer. I own spamming.pissant.luser.domain. I send mail from
>> spamming.pissant.luser.domain, but I forge envelopes and From: to say
>> that I'm (for example) ibm.com, to beat pattern-matching spa
Jack McKinney wrote:
>
> Big Brother tells me that Greg White wrote:
> > Jack McKinney wrote:
> > >
> > SNIP
> > >
> > > Yes, but the only mail servers that will get postmaster bombed are
> > > ones that either condone spam by allowing users to send it out, or are
> > > open relays. If RBL a
Big Brother tells me that Greg White wrote:
> Jack McKinney wrote:
> >
> SNIP
> >
> > Yes, but the only mail servers that will get postmaster bombed are
> > ones that either condone spam by allowing users to send it out, or are
> > open relays. If RBL and ORBS isn't enough to get these peop
Jack McKinney wrote:
>
SNIP
>
> Yes, but the only mail servers that will get postmaster bombed are
> ones that either condone spam by allowing users to send it out, or are
> open relays. If RBL and ORBS isn't enough to get these people to stop
> allowing relaying, perhaps postmaster mail fi
Big Brother tells me that [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> there is a 'badrcptto'-patch on www.qmail.org
> this will solve the problem on aris server. but... then he will bomb
> postmasteraccounts on other servers. not the best solution for the net.
> only cuting of the open relay and hang the admin
> From: Daniel Augusto Fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:28 PM
> > To: Tim Hunter
> > Cc: Ari Arantes Filho; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: SPAM - Help!
> >
> >
> > Tim Hunter wrote:
> > >
> > &
Markus Stumpf wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'd be inclined to make the user valid and have their .qmail just be
> > a comment so that the bounces gets delivered to nowhere. Other than that you
> > have to sit it out.
>
> What I found has helpe
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:37:37PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'd be inclined to make the user valid and have their .qmail just be
> > a comment so that the bounces gets delivered to nowhere. Other than that you
> > have to
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 08:28:36AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd be inclined to make the user valid and have their .qmail just be
> a comment so that the bounces gets delivered to nowhere. Other than that you
> have to sit it out.
What I found has helped a lot in this situation are the "b
or contacting the spammers isp.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Augusto Fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:28 PM
> To: Tim Hunter
> Cc: Ari Arantes Filho; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SPAM - Help!
>
> Tim Hunter wrote:
> >
&g
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 07:15:28PM +0200, Mira Tempir wrote:
> Please, explain us how can tcpserver help in this case.
> It is NOT his server which is used for spamming.
Someone is mistaken, tcpserver cannot help. Like many things,
only time can fix it.
Regards.
> To: Tim Hunter
> Cc: Ari Arantes Filho; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SPAM - Help!
>
>
> Tim Hunter wrote:
> >
> > If your using tcpserver, you should be denying his connection.
> >
> > If not you should be, you need to check LWQ for a good r
Please, explain us how can tcpserver help in this case.
It is NOT his server which is used for spamming.
Thanks
= 27/10/00 11:22 by Tim Hunter =
| If your using tcpserver, you should be denying his connection.
|
| If not you should be, you need to check LWQ for a good referenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:37:42PM -0300, Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Someone is using another smtp server to send a very big spam, but they
> > write the header with FROM = an unknown user of one of my virtual domains,
> > so postmasters keep send
Fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:28 PM
To: Tim Hunter
Cc: Ari Arantes Filho; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SPAM - Help!
Tim Hunter wrote:
>
> If your using tcpserver, you should be denying his connection.
>
> If not you should be, you need t
]]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 11:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SPAM - Help!
>
> Hello,
>
> Someone is using another smtp server to send a very big spam, but they
> write the header with FROM = an unknown user of one of my virtual domains,
> so postm
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:37:42PM -0300, Ari Arantes Filho wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone is using another smtp server to send a very big spam, but they
> write the header with FROM = an unknown user of one of my virtual domains,
> so postmasters keep sending bounce messages or autoresponders t
If your using tcpserver, you should be denying his connection.
If not you should be, you need to check LWQ for a good reference.
-Original Message-
From: Ari Arantes Filho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM - Help
Hello,
Someone is using another smtp server to send a very big spam, but they
write the header with FROM = an unknown user of one of my virtual domains,
so postmasters keep sending bounce messages or autoresponders to this
unknown user and my postmaster is receving more than 1 emails.
24 matches
Mail list logo
