Greetings:
My problem is that I have installed the spamcontrol patch but badrcptto
is not stopping incoming mails as I expected. Here are the details:
I am on OpenBSD 2.8. I have downloaded the spamcontrol patch and
successfully patched ./qmail-1.03 with only the following error
message
At 14:57 18/07/01, Lou Hevly wrote:
Greetings:
My problem is that I have installed the spamcontrol patch but
badrcptto
is not stopping incoming mails as I expected. Here are the details:
Answering my own question, it may be that because I originally
installed
qmail from an OpenBSD package
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:22:07PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
David Talkington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and
spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on
its own, but the second will fail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Henning Brauer wrote:
My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and
spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on
its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects.
I'm not sure about the contes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and
spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on
its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects.
Is there a solution? GNU 'patch' on rh7.1, if it matters
David Talkington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and
spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on
its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects.
Is there a solution?
Probably both patches touch
Hello,
i am having trouble with qmail and the spamcontrol patch. i am
using qmail with vpopmail and the spamcontol patch. I have a tcp.smtp
file to allow clients to relay mail, and i have a roaming users system set
up.
Now what i want to do is to only allow deliveries to existing users
Hi,
actually, this was a small bug in this early version of SPAMCONTROL.
Please upgrade to a new one.
You find the current releases at: http://www.fehcom.de/qmail
Thanks for using SPAMCONTROL.
cheers.
eh.
At 02:46 1.12.2000 +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:41:13PM
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:41:13PM -0800, Russ Ringer wrote:
I'm using qmail 1.03/spamcontrol 1.03 (yes, I know, I haven't put in 1.04 yet) and
have a list of invalid names in badrcptto. It works most of the time, but
occasionally, mail comes through to the bad rcptto name. The maillog shows
I'm using qmail 1.03/spamcontrol 1.03 (yes, I know, I haven't put in 1.04 yet) and
have a list of invalid names in badrcptto. It works most of the time, but
occasionally, mail comes through to the bad rcptto name. The maillog shows the mail
was blocked due to invalid recipient address
Hello everybody,
due to a bug in the logging E-mails with an originator having MAIL FROM:
with invalid MX-Record, SPAMCONTROL 1.4.0 may eventually yield a
qmail-smtpd crash (segmentation fault) depending on your logging scheme.
The bug was already introduced in version 1.1.0 but became apparent
Title: problems with the spamcontrol patch
Hi,
I have installed the spamcontrol patch to a base install of Q-Mail and most things seem to work fine.
However, there is one problem. When I put in an invalid senders (MAIL FROM) address to a SMTP connection, it closes the connection and does
hi,
I have spamcontrol installed adn it's running fine, but only the unix
servers can send email to it. The NT's and server2000 keeps getting
dropped. Do you have any idea why? I've added them into my DNS file so
that it can recognize the listed servers as local. How does NT SMTPSVC
Hi,
I almost missed your mail.
At 22:11 21.8.2000 +0200, Thomas Ackermann wrote:
I recently installed SPAMCONTROL (1.3.0)
and got to wonder how to handle control/relayclients, relaydomains and
relaymailfrom.
If you have installed the SPAMCONTROL patch completely with man-pages,
check man
I recently installed SPAMCONTROL (1.3.0)
and got to wonder how to handle control/relayclients, relaydomains and
relaymailfrom.
can i use these files without setting RELAYCLIENT with tcpserver and hows the
syntayx within these files ??
Hi,
a new version of the SPAMCONTROL patch is available by now.
Version 1.3.0 includes now Will Harris' SMTP SIZE extension.
Pls. check my Web-Site http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html
For users of Version 1.2.1: Pls upgrade to 1.2.2 or 1.3.0. Due to a mistake
generating the archive, mods from
Hi,
I finished a new version of my SPAMCONTROL patch.
It includes now Chris Johnson's TARPITTING and RELAYMAILFROM patch.
As usual it comes with documentation, man-pages, and (un)installation script.
Have a look at:
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html
Pls. give me feedbach in case of errors
Hi all,
I'm using Erwin Hoffmann spamcontrol patch and now I'm trying to bloc
addresses without @ without bloquing void addresses (mail from: )
which are used in bounce mails and can't be bloqued.
I've tried to put
*
!*@*
in the badmailpatterns but it blocs void addresses. Is there a way
Hi,
I gathered some infos about setting up QMAIL under SUSE Linux in my
Web-page http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html
Additionally, I have integreted the MFCHECK patch into my SPAMCONTROL with
some gadgets.
Everybody is welcome to use and comment it.
Cheers.
eh
Hi,
after some discussion with Bernat and Luis I updated the SPAMCONTROL patch
to fix the problems mentioned so far. It took a while because I was busy to
start a new web-page.
The SPAMCONTROL patch moved to: http://www.fehcom.de/qmail_en.html/
One basic problem left:
In case QMAIL-SMTPD
1
Hi all,
I have instaled qmail with the spamcontrol 1.0.6 patch with the
qmail-bounce.patch and the qmail-1.03-mfcheck.3.patch.
The problem is that the single addresses in badrcptto are not
refused until the next rcpt.
The sequence of a session is like this.
bash-2.03# telnet mx.domain.com
Hi all,
There is a problem in the patch, it check the address with
badrcptto before parse the address of the rcpt to: header
--
Bernat Ginard Lladó
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kaos.es
Hi all,
I have instaled qmail with the spamcontrol 1.0.6 patch with the
qmail
Hi,
thanks for the response.
1. I presume you installed the SPAMCONTROL patch as mentionend in the
INSTALL.spamcontrol. To verify that you should have a look into the
directory from where you installed qmail and browse the file
spamcontrol.log and mail me this file.
(a) The propper
Hello everyone,
I am having problems with my qmail MTA:
when mail-abuse.org tests my site, qmail is accepting MAIL FROM and RCPT
TO with PERCENTHACK.
My badrcptpatterns has the line:
*%*
And my badrmailpatterns has the line:
*%*
So, my MTA is already opened for relay
Could you help me?
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 04:59:14PM -0300, Luis Bezerra wrote:
I am having problems with my qmail MTA:
when mail-abuse.org tests my site, qmail is accepting MAIL FROM and RCPT
TO with PERCENTHACK.
Arrrggh!
Just after the test seemed to indicate that your MTA failed the test, did it
More info on this here:
http://www.faqts.com/knowledge-base/view.phtml/aid/1198/fid/206/lang/en
and here:
http://www.summersault.com/chris/techno/qmail/qmail-antispam.html
Another Chris
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 04:59:14PM -0300, Luis Bezerra
Hi,
thanks to all who commented my statements and perhaps my SPAMCONTROL patch.
(well, I live in Cologne and today is ... Rosenmontag).
Okay, back to the facts:
A) In the README I am referring a special situation, when QMAIL is used as
a RELAY Internet == INTRANET. My comments about Load
Hi,
the latast version of the SPAMCONTROL patch can be found here:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Erwin_Hoffmann/
cheers,
eh.
At 09:45 29.2.2000 -0300, you wrote:
Hello averyone,
How could I find the spamcontrol patch?
thanks in advance
--
-
Luís
Erwin Hoffmann writes:
Hi,
the latast version of the SPAMCONTROL patch can be found here:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Erwin_Hoffmann/
quoting from that file's README.spamcontrol file:
"Since QMAIL by contruction is an OPEN RELAY, some vulnerability may be
experi
Hi Russell,
I wrote in the README.spamcontrol:
"Since QMAIL by contruction is an OPEN RELAY, some vulnerability may be
experienced not in particular to the QMAIL system itself (which can
stand a heavy load), but for other MTAs which are flooded by
SPAM E-Mail. "
You're kidding, right?
== Am
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 06:24:39PM +0100, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
qmail is by construction an open relay??
== See RFC 2505.
If you install qmail as per the included documentation, you won't be running an
open relay. How will looking at RFC 2505 convince anyone otherwise?
For the next version
-Original Message-
From: Erwin Hoffmann [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Russell Nelson
Subject: Re: SPAMCONTROL patch
Hi Russell,
I wrote in the README.spamcontrol:
"Since QMAIL by contruction is an
Erwin Hoffmann writes:
You're kidding, right?
== Am I?
Apparently.
qmail is by construction an open relay??
== See RFC 2505.
qmail, when installed according to the instructions, is not an open
relay. Of the recommendations in RFC2505, qmail meets all but 8, 9,
10. By "qmail", I
Hello averyone,
How could I find the spamcontrol patch?
thanks in advance
--
-
Luís Bezerra de A. Junior
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SecrelNet Informática LTDA
Fortaleza - Ceará - Brasil
Fone: 021852882090
-
Hi,
I've just setup a new Qmail-1.03 server running tcpserver and the
SPAMCONTROL patch I received from Erwin Hoffmann. When I test my mailserver
at http://www.abuse.net/relay.html it still failes at Relay test 6... so it
seems the patch is not working. What could be wrong?
Erwin
Erwin van Kroonenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just setup a new Qmail-1.03 server running tcpserver and the
SPAMCONTROL patch I received from Erwin Hoffmann. When I test my mailserver
at http://www.abuse.net/relay.html it still failes at Relay test 6... so it
seems the patch
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Erwin van Kroonenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just setup a new Qmail-1.03 server running tcpserver and the
SPAMCONTROL patch I received from Erwin Hoffmann. When I test my
mailserver at http://www.abuse.net/relay.html it still failes at Relay
test 6
At 16:12 3.2.2000 +0100, you wrote:
When I test something like "mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" the spampatch
does work! :)
But are you sure I can pass all tests on abuse.net/relay.html with the
spampatch? Because that's why I got the patch...
Regards,
Erwin
Hi,
the RELAY test (according to
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:00:46 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Dr. Erwin Hoffmann" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QMAIL 1.03 SPAMCONTROL Patch
X-Attachments: E:\QMail\patches\spampatch.tgz;
Hi,
I would like to give my SPAMCONTROL patch for QMAIL 1.03 to the public.
Here's th
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:00:46 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Dr. Erwin Hoffmann" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QMAIL 1.03 SPAMCONTROL Patch
X-Attachments: E:\QMail\patches\spampatch.tgz;
Hi,
I would like to give my SPAMCONTROL patch for QMAIL 1.03 to the public.
Here's th
40 matches
Mail list logo
