[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>This is how the .qmail-file looks like.
>| /usr/local/bin/myScript.pl
>
>Problem is now that I am missing the Delivered-To line, qmail normally
>adds. Why?
Because you're delivering to a pipe, not a mailbox. (See "man
qmail-command"). T
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 04:41:13PM +0100, Markus Wuebben wrote:
> Problem is now that I am missing the Delivered-To line, qmail normally
> adds.
You can add it yourself by prepending $ENV{'DTLINE'} to the safecat input.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Re
Hi!
I have a strange problem.
I am piping so of my mails through a script which does some stuff on the
mails and then safecats the mails into a maildir.
This is how the .qmail-file looks like.
| /usr/local/bin/myScript.pl
Problem is now that I am missing the Delivered-To line, qmail normally
>
> While it's obvious why I'm interested as to whether the above
> constitutes a valid To: line or not.
It's not. According to RFC 822, ":" is a special, which means it has to
be quoted to be used inside a word. That has to be written as:
To: "
ile it's obvious why I'm interested as to whether the above
constitutes a valid To: line or not.
Cheers,
Greg
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 14:44:15 -0800, David B. Peterson wrote:
>Here is the original To: line (slightly modified to protect the guilty.)
>To: "Someone Else"
MTAs don't care about To: (unless they've been messed with). qmail
cares about the envelope sender.
"So
David B. Peterson wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
^ ^
>>:
^ ^
Notice something? Outlook screwed it.
Stefan
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, David B. Peterson wrote:
> The following error occurred on a Solaris 5.7 machine running Qmail 1.03:
>
> Here is the original To: line (slightly modified to protect the guilty.)
> To: "Someone Else"
...
> >:
> >Sorry, I couldn
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 02:44:15PM -0800,
"David B. Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The following error occurred on a Solaris 5.7 machine running Qmail 1.03:
>
>
> Here is the original To: line (slightly modified to protect the guilty.)
> To: &quo
Text written by David B. Peterson at 02:44 PM 3/30/99 -0800:
>
>Here is the original To: line (slightly modified to protect the guilty.)
>To: "Someone Else"
>
>And here is the error I get:
>
>>:
>>Sorry, I couldn't find any host named otherdomain.com
The following error occurred on a Solaris 5.7 machine running Qmail 1.03:
Here is the original To: line (slightly modified to protect the guilty.)
To: "Someone Else"
And here is the error I get:
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, March 2
Sam,
Your reply is almost aggressively terse. Perhaps you could explain, for
the benefit of those of us less knowledgeable than yourself, exactly *how*
the To: line is broken and how it might be fixed. What should it look
like? And how does it reflect on section 3.4.6 of
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 10:23:16PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] is not an Internet mail address. It's not even
> remotely close to an Internet mail address. I don't know what the client
> that's generating such things is trying to talk to, but it's not trying to
> talk t
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] is not an Internet mail address. It's not even
:remotely close to an Internet mail address. I don't know what the client
:that's generating such things is trying to talk to, but it's not trying to
:talk to an Internet mail server.
Rik Ling wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> Perhaps you could explain exactly *how* the To: line is broken and how
> it might be fixed.
> What should it look like? And how does it reflect on section 3.4.6 of
> RFC822?
This is not an RFC822 issue; it is rather a matter of RFC821 compliance.
Rik Ling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your reply is almost aggressively terse. Perhaps you could explain, for
> the benefit of those of us less knowledgeable than yourself, exactly
> *how* the To: line is broken and how it might be fixed.
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] is not a
Rik Ling writes:
> Sam,
>
> Your reply is almost aggressively terse. Perhaps you could explain, for
> the benefit of those of us less knowledgeable than yourself, exactly *how*
> the To: line is broken and how it might be fixed.
If the To: header looks like the following, as i
Sam,
Your reply is almost aggressively terse. Perhaps you could explain, for
the benefit of those of us less knowledgeable than yourself, exactly *how*
the To: line is broken and how it might be fixed. What should it look
like? And how does it reflect on section 3.4.6 of RFC822? Is that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> So how do I enable qmail to get through this To: line???
You don't. This is a broken To: line that is illegal.
> Do I need to make a script to check To: line of all incoming mails and
> strip if off if it has bracket([SMTP: ]).
No. You need to
> From: Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: To: line
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 09:50:03 -0600
>
>
>This is a little off topic. I'm running qmail server on linux machine.
>When one of my customer sends mail thr
This is a little off topic. I'm running qmail server on linux machine.
When one of my customer sends mail through my mail server, it is rejected
because of To: line:
To: [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
failure: Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_aquacorp.com].
Qma
This is a little off topic. I'm running qmail server on linux machine.
When one of my customer sends mail through my mail server, it is rejected
because of To: line:
To: [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
failure: Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_aquacorp.com].
Qmail doesn't strip
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> Because you probably got this "ad" (spam) sent as a bulk mail, and
> your address was in the Bcc: header---which gets removed upon delivery
> (bcc=BlindCarbonCopy).
>
> Mate---
> Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
>
Acutal
R Aldridge writes:
> This isn't really a qmail question, more mail in general. I received an
> email with the following header. Although it was "Received: for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]", it doesn't have a "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" line ?!
> Or maybe I'm missing something. Any ideas anyone ?
.Ah
Because you probably got this "ad" (spam) sent as a bulk mail, and
your address was in the Bcc: header---which gets removed upon delivery
(bcc=BlindCarbonCopy).
Mate---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
?!
>Or maybe I'm missing something. Any ideas anyone ?
you needn't got a TO:-Line. What you need is a received line with the
mailing address
Received: from [...] for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:53:51 GMT
But this Header is from _Sendmail_. In Qmail you either have no
This isn't really a qmail question, more mail in general. I received an
email with the following header. Although it was "Received: for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]", it doesn't have a "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" line ?!
Or maybe I'm missing something. Any ideas anyone ?
Thanks,
Richard Aldridge.
Receiv
27 matches
Mail list logo
