Panda Antivirus a trouvé les virus suivants dans le message :
Envoyé par :Forrest Sutton
Adresse : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet : Re: Very slow qmail response
Date : 24/04/2001 05:00:43
THIS MESSAGE
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
And -l 0 is also nonsense.
No, it's not
This should be -l localhostname this is
a NAME, not a number.
Says who?
See
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
You should have seen it yourself. From that URL:
* -l
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
And -l 0 is also nonsense. This should be -l localhostname this is
a NAME, not a number.
It can be whatever you want, and if you're not concerned about what is logged,
0 is as good as anything else. In fact, 0 is what DJB's
.
The header from the infected e-mail:
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: jessica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Very slow qmail response
Message-ID: 015f01c0cbff$176f6810$0300a8c0@acer345t
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Very slow qmail response
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
And -l 0 is also nonsense.
No, it's not
This should be -l localhostname this is
a NAME, not a number.
Says who
Panda Antivirus a trouvé les virus suivants dans le message :
Envoyé par :jessica
Adresse : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet : Re: Very slow qmail response
Date : 23/04/2001 16:44:09
THIS MESSAGE CONTENT
Panda Antivirus a trouvé les virus suivants dans le message :
Envoyé par :jessica
Adresse : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pour : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet : Re: Very slow qmail response
Date : 23/04/2001 16:54:39
THIS MESSAGE CONTENT
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
And -l 0 is also nonsense.
No, it's not
This should be -l localhostname this is
a NAME, not a number.
Says who?
See
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
You should have seen it yourself. From that URL:
* -l
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
And -l 0 is also nonsense. This should be -l localhostname this is
a NAME, not a number.
It can be whatever you want, and if you're not concerned about what is
logged,
0 is as good as anything else. In fact, 0 is what DJB's
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:50:14AM -0700, Tom Jackson wrote:
Also note that a few recent messages were in error in suggesting -h flag
to tcpserver. The options I used are:
-v -p -l 0 -H -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
But isn't the -p not
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 10:05:33PM +0100, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
This should be "-l localhostname" this is
a NAME, not a number.
Says who?
Says me (see below)
You should have seen it yourself. From that URL:
* -l localname: Do not look up the local host name in DNS; use
Peter Cavender wrote:
Have there been any changes on the DNS setup for your system; i.e., your
nameservers. In my experience this has been the #1 cause of delays,
because email/qmail depends heavliy on DNS service. I have several
nameserver changeovers, and when things are not exactly
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:50:14AM -0700, Tom Jackson wrote:
Also note that a few recent messages were in error in suggesting -h flag
to tcpserver. The options I used are:
-v -p -l 0 -H -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
But isn't the -p not correct here?
If you use -p and DNS is broken you will
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
And "-l 0" is also nonsense.
No, it's not
This should be "-l localhostname" this is
a NAME, not a number.
Says who?
See
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
You should have seen it yourself. From that URL:
*
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Markus Stumpf wrote:
And "-l 0" is also nonsense. This should be "-l localhostname" this is
a NAME, not a number.
It can be whatever you want, and if you're not concerned about what is logged,
0 is as good as anything else. In fact, 0 is what DJB's
My qmail has been running fine for a year or more. Now it is very slow
to accept connections on SMTP or POP3 ports.
I get this behavior from other computers on the local network, but
everything works as usual from the qmail server.
I've tried it with telnet, Netscape and other software with
Have there been any changes on the DNS setup for your system; i.e., your
nameservers. In my experience this has been the #1 cause of delays,
because email/qmail depends heavliy on DNS service. I have several
nameserver changeovers, and when things are not exactly kosher, qmail
grinds to a
17 matches
Mail list logo
