Re: concurrencyremote limit

1999-02-13 Thread Tim Pierce
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 06:37:22PM +0800, Marlon Anthony Abao wrote: hello, with the release of the new linux kernel, the limit of concurrent processes is now raised. according to conf-spawn we cannot raise the qmail concurrency limit past 256. is there any reason for this? Qmail

Re: concurrencyremote limit

1999-02-13 Thread dirk
Carefull, 255 = , 256=0001 Dirk On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 03:47:58PM -0500, Tim Pierce wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 06:37:22PM +0800, Marlon Anthony Abao wrote: hello, with the release of the new linux kernel, the limit of concurrent processes is now raised. according

Re: concurrencyremote limit

1999-02-13 Thread dirk
Ahmm. Oops. Yes, my 256 should have been a 257. Dirk On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 05:23:04PM -0800, Mike Holling wrote: Carefull, 255 = , 256=0001 256 = 0001 257 = 0001 0001 - Mike

concurrencyremote limit

1999-02-11 Thread Marlon Anthony Abao
hello, with the release of the new linux kernel, the limit of concurrent processes is now raised. according to conf-spawn we cannot raise the qmail concurrency limit past 256. is there any reason for this? i know raising this limit would break some unix boxes. is there a