clemensF wrote:
>
> > wolfgang zeikat:
>
> > http://spamcop.net offers handy online forms
>
> i have used all sorts of anti-spam tricks, but presently i just look at the
> headers of a spam-mail trying to spot from which domain it really originated
> by scanning the recieved-lines and use "[EMA
> David Benfell:
> As I recall, the argument is that by responding, you confirm that the
> e-mail address is valid. I can't say I've dealt with enough spam to
> have relevant experience.
i've had spamming for just surfing around the 'net, and it grew worse
occasionally when i tried to avoid it
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 09:41:50PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
>
> that's dangerous. my experience told me never to answer suspect spammers.
>
As I recall, the argument is that by responding, you confirm that the
e-mail address is valid. I can't say I've dealt with enough spam to
have relevant expe
> Cyril Bitterich:
> But there is a good Point in you proposal. Maybe you just wanted to
> reject the mail with a notification that you do not accept this mail
> because they are not sent via Hotmail.
that's dangerous. my experience told me never to answer suspect spammers.
clemens
> Rogerio Brito:
> For instance, all my e-mails use iname.com as the envelope and
> as the From: field, but I don't send mail from them (in fact,
> they are in another country); I use my ISP's relays.
my spam peeked up when i got myself an iname.com-account. i think they
sell
> wolfgang zeikat:
> http://spamcop.net offers handy online forms
i have used all sorts of anti-spam tricks, but presently i just look at the
headers of a spam-mail trying to spot from which domain it really originated
by scanning the recieved-lines and use "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as well
as postmas
Cerberus - the Guardian of Hades writes:
> i need to unsubscribe:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> from this list as he is no longer a user at this server. please help.
0. Arrange for mail to those addresses to be delivered somewhere where
you can get to it.
On Jul 04 2000, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> But this is exactly the point.
> Valid (e.g.!!!) hotmail.com eMails should come from an outgoing
> hotmail.com smtp server. If they don't they're most probably faked
> sender addresses used by spammers.
No, they should not.
For instance, all
i need to unsubscribe:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from this list as he is no longer a user at this server. please help.
regards,
mark
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> At 22:37 4.7.2000 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
this is a bit off topic,
but i consider it useful anyway ...
http://spamcop.net offers handy online forms
that process spam mails (do whois / dns lookups) and prepare a
ready-to-send
complaint emails with choices which ISP/Mail Server to send them to ... i
use it a lot with spam arriving in our d
Hi again,
At 22:37 4.7.2000 +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> since I'm dealing with the SPAMCONTROL patch, I would like to comment your
>> problem:
>>
>> 1. You are right. Within the filtering mechanisms a logical "AND" scheme is
>> missing. To implement thi
Hi Markus. Or, your users can put the following in their
individual ~/.procmailrc:
:0
* ? test -f "${HOME}/.procmail.reject"
* ? formail -c -x received: | fgrep -i -s -f "${HOME}/.procmail.reject"
/dev/null
where ${HOME}/.procmail.reject is a record list of the form:
[123.32
Markus Stumpf wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 01:17:46PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > This would block a lot of valid mail as well. I frequently send mail from
> > a given machine using a different (but valid) envelope sender -- and I will
> > sometimes use my Hotmail address if I am a
Hi Marcus,
> existance of e.g.
>/var/qmail/control/knownsmpt/hotmail.com
> in case the sender domain is hotmail.com, read from the file a list
> of IP addresses and accept the mail, if TCPREMOTEIP is on the list
> or deny it otherwise (hard or temporary, one's milleage may vary).
[...]
> Any
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 01:17:46PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> This would block a lot of valid mail as well. I frequently send mail from
> a given machine using a different (but valid) envelope sender -- and I will
> sometimes use my Hotmail address if I am afraid that I might end up on
> the
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> since I'm dealing with the SPAMCONTROL patch, I would like to comment your
> problem:
>
> 1. You are right. Within the filtering mechanisms a logical "AND" scheme is
> missing. To implement this requires some attention.
>
> 2. Principally the following checks
Hi,
since I'm dealing with the SPAMCONTROL patch, I would like to comment your
problem:
1. You are right. Within the filtering mechanisms a logical "AND" scheme is
missing. To implement this requires some attention.
2. Principally the following checks could be applied:
Logic:
a) The envelope's
Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But this is exactly the point.
> Valid (e.g.!!!) hotmail.com eMails should come from an outgoing
> hotmail.com smtp server. If they don't they're most probably faked
> sender addresses used by spammers.
> There is not any switch of tcpserver that helps
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 11:23:05AM -0500, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
> You might want to look at MAPS RSS and MAPS DUL too. We use
> RBL+RSS+DUL.
This was an example. Ok... they use a relay open mailserver that is on no
list yet.
> See the tcpserver man page at http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.htm
On 04-Jul-2000, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> we have the problem that we receive a lot of spam with sender addresses
> e.g. @hotmail.com but the mail is relayed via open relay mailservers
> (not on e.g. mail-abuse RBL).
You might want to look at MAPS RSS and MAPS DUL too. We use
RBL+RSS+DUL.
> I think
Hoi folx,
we have the problem that we receive a lot of spam with sender addresses
e.g. @hotmail.com but the mail is relayed via open relay mailservers
(not on e.g. mail-abuse RBL).
I think it would not be too hard to hack qmail-smtpd to check for the
existance of e.g.
/var/qmail/control/known
21 matches
Mail list logo