RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
> -Original Message- > From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 6:26 PM > Despite the smiley, that first paragraph sounds supiciously insulting. > And why are you trying to turn this into a dicksize war? Oh, Charles...I'm feeling impetuous. Pleas

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please don't cc: me on your list messages [...] > > While learning anything necessarily about linux or qmail from > you may be dubious, I will definitely learn perfection :) > > My humblest apologies that I failed to remove your personal > address

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
Gadzooks In my previous reply to Charles Cazabon I was IMPRECISE. My rcpthosts file is NOT blank, it has localhost in it. Just wanted to clear that up before Charles could retort :) Scott Zielsdorf Senior Technical Support Consultant Computer Instruments 9901 W. 87th St. Overland Park, KS 66

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
> -Original Message- > From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 1:52 PM > First of all, I'm on the list, and I set Mail-Followup-To: > appropriately. Please don't cc: me on your list messages; I hate > duplicates and get 500-1000 messages a day al

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
First of all, I'm on the list, and I set Mail-Followup-To: appropriately. Please don't cc: me on your list messages; I hate duplicates and get 500-1000 messages a day already. Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It's "setuidgid", not "setguidgid". > > Yeah, people keep telling me

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
-Original Message- > From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > So did I 'fat finger' setguidid somewhere in a script or did my > daemontools > > install fail and I just didn't realize it? Or is there another problem? > > It's "setuidgid", not "setguidgid". Yeah, people keep tel

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? (fwd)

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Charlie Chrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do you get tcpserver to run the qmail-smtpd daemon? When I run it > as in the faq, it runs and I see the process running, but it doesn't > accept connections. I then changed it to use inetd using tcp-env and > qmail-smtpd accepts connections. Co

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? (fwd)

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Please quote properly; your original text was after a sig delimiter, and you had no attribution for my text. I wrote: > > There are precisely zero advantages to using inetd/xinetd in this > > manner, and several disadvantages (when compared to a simple > > tcpserver installation). [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My thanks to Lukas Beeler who asked me to run 'ps auxf' and behold! > I found errors coming from readproctile telling me it couldn't find > /usr/local/bin/setguidid. [...] > So did I 'fat finger' setguidid somewhere in a script or did my daemonto

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? (fwd)

2001-08-04 Thread Charlie Chrisman
ction? Charlie Chrisman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 6:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? (fwd) Possibly the reason you were "blasted" is that th

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? (fwd)

2001-08-04 Thread robr
Possibly the reason you were "blasted" is that this is incorrect. You _cannot_ make inetd or xinetd use tcpserver. Your xinetd script doesn't use tcpserver; it uses tcp-env. tcp-env was originally designed to allow you to do tcpserver-like operations from inetd, but is now deprecated. There

RE: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-03 Thread Scott Zielsdorf
> -Original Message- > From: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Subject: Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help? > > Possibly the reason you were "blasted" is that this is incorrect. LOL...You think? > You_cannot_ make inetd or xinetd

Re: tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By searching on the keywords "xinetd" and "qmail" on the web I was able to > find a script that allowed xinetd to use tcpserver as its daemon and then > the relaying rules in /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb worked. [...] Possibly the reason you were "blasted" is

tcpserver problems? or is it qmail? or BOTH! Help?

2001-08-03 Thread Craziest Manalive
Hey all, I'll keep it short. I am hoping to implement qmail where i work for a canadian univeristy. I have installed linux 7.1 and qmail and tcpserver. all services appear to be running error free. I can connect to the box on the local machine, but not from outside the box at all. I have