Re: [qmailtoaster] Request to test whatami.sh

Thanks, TiTo. I know now exactly what you mean. -- -Eric 'shubes' TiTo wrote: hi eric ^_^, what i mean with "i586 text" is it was the parameter for my CentOS 4.3 installation ... not for qmailtoaster :) ... the default installation architecture for CentOS is i386, and because my system is

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: updated packages broke my qmail install

I did several things, I am not sure which one actually fixed the problem. I thought I had an updated system because 'yum update' reported ok. I ran the dependency checker and it installed some stuff which wasn't installed before. Then I reran update.sh, but.. I still had to manually installed

Re: [qmailtoaster] $ARCH vs uname

Nick Hemmesch wrote: Nick, I'm trying to set $ARCH according to uname. Which should I use? # uname -p i686 # uname -i i386 According to man uname, -p is the processor type (more specific), and -i is the hardware platform (less specific). My machine is a Pentium-II, so i686 is correct for the p

Re: [qmailtoaster] quota problem in qmail with spam-detection

>> >> > Is there any way to disable that feature without upgradig the hole >> >> server? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > Natalio. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi Natalio, >> >> >> >> The problem is with maildrop filtering. Maildrop bypasses normal >> quota >> >> checking and uses it's own which does

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: updated packages broke my qmail install

Hi Eric, What was the solution? Regards, Nick > Yes, the problem is indeed solved. Also, it seems like even though the log > indicate the mail were being 'eaten'. They have all some how come back. > > Thanks everyone! > > -Eric > - Original Message - > From: "Nick Hemmesch" <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [qmailtoaster] quota problem in qmail with spam-detection

>> > Is there any way to disable that feature without upgradig the hole >> server? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Natalio. >> > >> >> Hi Natalio, >> >> The problem is with maildrop filtering. Maildrop bypasses normal quota >> checking and uses it's own which does not work, at least with our setup. >>

Re: [qmailtoaster] Request to test whatami.sh

hi eric ^_^, what i mean with "i586 text" is it was the parameter for my CentOS 4.3 installation ... not for qmailtoaster :) ... the default installation architecture for CentOS is i386, and because my system is using Xeon, therefor i'm using i586 parameter so that it will be more optimized t

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: updated packages broke my qmail install

Yes, the problem is indeed solved. Also, it seems like even though the log indicate the mail were being 'eaten'. They have all some how come back. Thanks everyone! -Eric - Original Message - From: "Nick Hemmesch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:47 PM Subject:

Re: [qmailtoaster] $ARCH vs uname

> Nick, > > I'm trying to set $ARCH according to uname. Which should I use? > > # uname -p > i686 > # uname -i > i386 > > According to man uname, -p is the processor type (more specific), and -i > is the hardware platform (less specific). My machine is a Pentium-II, so > i686 is correct for the pro

Re: [qmailtoaster] Request to test whatami.sh

Hi TiTo, I'm still wondering which value would be best for ARCH. From what you said earlier, i686 is good for you. I'm not sure what you mean by the "i586 text" parameter. Wouldn't i686 have been better, or is that not possible? I still don't have a clear understanding of what the various A

Re: [qmailtoaster] Request to test whatami.sh

hi eric ^_^, result on my system : ### DISTRO=cnt40 ARCH=i686 BDIR=redhat This machine's OS is supported, but this version/arch has not been tested. If your OS is not current, you should consider upgrading it. Proceed at your own risk ... ### my production server is CentOS 4.3 installed usin

Re: [qmailtoaster] $ARCH vs uname

hi everybody ^_^, for your information ... i've used the "--target=i686" parameter since the first qmailtoaster packages ... and until now, it works well on my production server using qmailtoaster packages build 20060514 ... so, eric, i believe it wouldn't be any issues (IMHO) ... looking fo

[qmailtoaster] Request to test whatami.sh

I wrote the attached script today. It assigns the DISTRO, ARCH, and BDIR variables for the install and upgrade scripts. This will help allow for a single install and upgrade script for all platforms, making maintenance easier. In its present form, it doesn't *do* anything except output (echo)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: updated packages broke my qmail install

Hey Nick,I didn't fix the problem with the new packages, I went ahead and uninstalled the updated packages and re-installed the older version. Server is up and running now. I will give it another shot when time permitted. Thanks for the follow up. On 6/13/06, Nick Hemmesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: upgrade.sh script

Hey TiTo, Cool. I've got the --target=$ARCH added to my new script. Testing is coming along, but I still have a few dependency issues to resolve. I hope to have it done this week. Thanks. -- -Eric 'shubes' TiTo wrote: hi eric ^_^, i use --with $DISTRO --target=$ARCH for every rpmbuild comma

[qmailtoaster] $ARCH vs uname

Nick, I'm trying to set $ARCH according to uname. Which should I use? # uname -p i686 # uname -i i386 According to man uname, -p is the processor type (more specific), and -i is the hardware platform (less specific). My machine is a Pentium-II, so i686 is correct for the processor. Will toast

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: upgrade.sh script

hi eric ^_^, i use --with $DISTRO --target=$ARCH for every rpmbuild command including zlib ... i think the rpm files will be more specific for the system ... actually i'm not using djbdns yet, but i've tested to rebuild using those parameters above ... and so far it works well in my production

Re: [qmailtoaster] Trustix info

Ok, great. I just ran across a web page that referenced it, didn't notice (nor look for) a release status. Nick Hemmesch wrote: Hey, Nick. Looks like the latest Mandriva is 2006.1 (Jan'06). Are you really still 2006.0? As far as I know, 2006.1 is still in beta. Mandriva does not have it on

Re: [qmailtoaster] Trustix info

> Hey, Nick. > > Looks like the latest Mandriva is 2006.1 (Jan'06). > Are you really still 2006.0? > As far as I know, 2006.1 is still in beta. Mandriva does not have it on there mirrors yet. Regards, Nick - QmailToaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] /etc/*-release contents

> Hey Nick, > > Can you send me the contents of /etc/mandrake-release and > /etc/SuSE-release? I've got CentOS and Fedora covered. > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > cat /etc/SuSE-release SUSE LINUX 10.1 (i586) VERSION = 10.1 Regards, Nick --

Re: [qmailtoaster] Trustix info

Hey, Nick. Looks like the latest Mandriva is 2006.1 (Jan'06). Are you really still 2006.0? Nick Hemmesch wrote: Hi, Trustix is no longer supported. Many of the supported distros have not been tested with the new packages due to the extreme amount of time required for each distro. The latest v

Re: [qmailtoaster] removing an old qmail install

Jake Vickers wrote: Elliot Adler wrote: What is the correct way of uninstalling an old qmail toaster install bec, I want to redo it with the newest toaster Thanks I have an uninstall script for older versions, that I'm going to email to you off-list. It was written to remove qmail installs fo

[qmailtoaster] /etc/*-release contents

Hey Nick, Can you send me the contents of /etc/mandrake-release and /etc/SuSE-release? I've got CentOS and Fedora covered. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted

Re: [qmailtoaster] Trustix info

I certainly understand the "time of test" factor. ;) Okay with me, Trustix not supported. As you've probably guessed, I'm writing some script that will automagically determine the DISTRO, ARCH, and BDIR parameters for the install and upgrade scripts. I'll keep you posted. Nick Hemmesch wrote

Re: [qmailtoaster] Trustix info

If memory serves, the webmin install uses these to figure out what os it is on. - Original Message - From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "qmailtoaster-list" Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 3:47 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] Trustix info I see that Trustix is a supported platfor

Re: [qmailtoaster] Trustix info

Hi, Trustix is no longer supported. Many of the supported distros have not been tested with the new packages due to the extreme amount of time required for each distro. The latest versions of supported distros have been tested by me. They are: CentOS 4.3 (i386 & X86_64), Fedora Core 5 (i386 & x86

[qmailtoaster] Trustix info

I see that Trustix is a supported platform. Will someone with such a box please tell me if it contains a /etc/*-release file, and if so, what is the full name and contents? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Ho

RE: [qmailtoaster] removing an old qmail install

Can u send that to me as well please thnks -Original Message- From: "Jake Vickers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: 13/06/06 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] removing an old qmail install Elliot Adler wrote: > What is the correct way of uninstalling an

Re: [qmailtoaster] removing an old qmail install

Elliot Adler wrote: What is the correct way of uninstalling an old qmail toaster install bec, I want to redo it with the newest toaster Thanks I have an uninstall script for older versions, that I'm going to email to you off-list. It was written to remove qmail installs for devel work (instal

Re: [qmailtoaster] removing an old qmail install

> What is the correct way of uninstalling an old qmail toaster install > bec, I want to redo it with the newest toaster > > Thanks > >From the website home page: To update manually, you must remove libdomainkeys, control-panel-toaster and spamassassin-toaster with "rpm -e --nodeps" just prior to

[qmailtoaster] removing an old qmail install

What is the correct way of uninstalling an old qmail toaster install bec, I want to redo it with the newest toaster Thanks - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted ---

Re: [qmailtoaster] package dependencies

Hi Nick, Thanks for the info. That pretty much answers my questions regarding removal of packages, but I don't think you understood what I'm trying to convey. I'm trying to do the upgrade a bit differently. In order to minimize down time, I'm attempting to rpmbuild all (or as many as possibl

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: updated packages broke my qmail install

Hi, How are we doing with this problem. Has it been resolved, or does it still exist? Regards, Nick > Hi Erik and Slump, > > Do a qmailctl stat and look to see if the logging is working, or if it has > errored out. If it has error out, check the /var/log/qmail/* ownerships. > The proper ownersh

Re: [qmailtoaster] package dependencies

Hi Eric, On the website it shows which packages have to be removed for a clean build of this new version. It is because qmail-toaster requires libdomainkeys prior to the build of the new qmail-toaster, so remove libdomainkeys with "--nodeps". The package control-panel-toaster requires courier-ima

[qmailtoaster] A little question

I have upgrade my Qmail Toaster box to last (current ) version. Thanks to all  toaster  team, its whole I wish J . But I am interesting about a topic. Default spam level for simscan is 12, well. What is the default action for spam messages  equal or higher than 12 ? is it bounce or redirec

[qmailtoaster] package dependencies

I'm working on a improving the upgrade.sh script. I'm attempting to make it such that it recognizes it's environment to the extent that it can tell what's already installed and what's already downloaded, so that it can be rerun, or run in parts. (It might end up being smart enough to do an inst

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

Yes, y stoped qmail before upgrade, etc All upgrade process where fine, all proccess are running plus smtp-ssl configured (pop3-ssl and imap-ssl too). And yes, server has been rebooted (kernel upgrades and so on) after the qmail update. Thanks -- Samuel Díaz García ArcosCom Wireless, S.L.L

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domainkey on bind

Title: Domainkey on bind Hi Marco,   It may be the DNS server cache your result and give you error:   Here is what I have in bind: (primary and slave --- ns1.example.com and ns2.example.com)   _domainkey.example.com. IN TXT "t=y; o=-";default._domainkey.example.com. IN TXT "very long"

[qmailtoaster] update.sh: remove packages

I see in the update.sh script that these packages are removed before doing the install: libdomainkeys control-panel-toaster courier-imap-toaster spamassassin-toaster clamav-toaster simscan-toaster I understand removing libdomainkeys, because it changed to libdomainkeys-toaster. Will libdomainke

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

Samuel Díaz García wrote: I didn't use the "update.sh" script, I compile all for i686 target platform and then install RPM's manually. Did you stop qmail before installing the new packages? I know you also had to remove spamassassin before installing the new version, and maybe for maildrop as

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

I didn't use the "update.sh" script, I compile all for i686 target platform and then install RPM's manually. Thanks Eric "Shubes" escribió: Samuel Díaz García wrote: Yes, this issues began when I updated to the FC5 ready toaster packages. Before, I was using the FC4 with wome patches I send

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

Samuel Díaz García wrote: Yes, this issues began when I updated to the FC5 ready toaster packages. Before, I was using the FC4 with wome patches I send to this list and all toaster components where working fine, but after that, some clamav/squirrelmail security problems appeared, forced to me to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: upgrade.sh script

Thanks, TiTo. I've updated the upgrade.sh script I'm working on, but it's not quite ready for release yet (should be very soon). I noticed that you have "--with $DISTRO" specified for build of the $ZLIB package. The upgrade.sh script I have doesn't have that parameter for $ZLIB. Should it? A

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

These are the results of the "ls" commands: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -al /var/qmail/control/ total 140 drwxr-xr-x 3 root qmail 4096 jun 13 01:01 . drwxr-xr-x 12 root qmail 4096 may 25 17:01 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 24 may 25 16:59 badloadertypes -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2164 may 25 17:00 bad

Re: FW: [qmailtoaster] Domainkey on bind

Hi, Check here for further information: http://jeremy.kister.net/howto/dk.html Regards, Nick > > I try but always I get : (from > http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html ) > > > > Testing kmtconsult.com.br > > > No _domainkey TXT record found for kmtconsult.com.br > > my bind conf

Re: [qmailtoaster] quota problem in qmail with spam-detection

> On 6/13/06, Nick Hemmesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > I have a server with QT installed. It is not the latest version, but >> > this is a critical server and can not upgrade it on the fly (and >> > besides that, is at 500km). >> > I´m having some quota issues. Specifically, some u

FW: [qmailtoaster] Domainkey on bind

Title: Domainkey on bind   I try but always I get : (from http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/selectorcheck.html )   Testing kmtconsult.com.br No _domainkey TXT record found for kmtconsult.com.br   my bind config ... the last one ;-)) I try many ... (linux centos 4.3)  

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

Samuel Díaz García wrote: I have enought space available, that isn't the problem. Perhaps permissions. ¿What files you need to see owner/group? ¿What directory? There's no problem to put here the "ls -l" output. Let's see the list for /var/qmail/control as well as /home/vpopmail/domains/your

Re: [qmailtoaster] quota problem in qmail with spam-detection

On 6/13/06, Nick Hemmesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I have a server with QT installed. It is not the latest version, but > this is a critical server and can not upgrade it on the fly (and > besides that, is at 500km). > I´m having some quota issues. Specifically, some users are receiv

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

Hi, ls -la /home/vpopmail/ & ls -la /var/log/qmail/ Regards, Nick > I have enought space available, that isn't the problem. > > Perhaps permissions. ¿What files you need to see owner/group? ¿What > directory? There's no problem to put here the "ls -l" output. > > Regards > > -- > Samuel Díaz G

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

I have enought space available, that isn't the problem. Perhaps permissions. ¿What files you need to see owner/group? ¿What directory? There's no problem to put here the "ls -l" output. Regards -- Samuel Díaz García ArcosCom Wireless, S.L.L. CIF: B11828068 c/ Romero Gago, 19 Arcos de la Fronte

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

Yes, this issues began when I updated to the FC5 ready toaster packages. Before, I was using the FC4 with wome patches I send to this list and all toaster components where working fine, but after that, some clamav/squirrelmail security problems appeared, forced to me to update the packages. I don

Re: [qmailtoaster] quota problem in qmail with spam-detection

> Hello, > I have a server with QT installed. It is not the latest version, but > this is a critical server and can not upgrade it on the fly (and > besides that, is at 500km). > I´m using the following versions: > > maildrop-toaster-1.8.1-1.2.10 > ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.2.9 > maildrop-toaster-de

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: updated packages broke my qmail install

Hi Erik and Slump, Do a qmailctl stat and look to see if the logging is working, or if it has errored out. If it has error out, check the /var/log/qmail/* ownerships. The proper ownerships are qmaill:qmail I believe you may have an ownership problem with some files. Check the ownership of /home/v

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

that was the same error i was getting when i updated to the packages. have you updated to the new packages by any chance?On 6/13/06, Samuel Díaz García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:This is an example recived from ezmlm from qmailtoaster-list. The account samueldg (the mine) is working fine.The proble

[qmailtoaster] quota problem in qmail with spam-detection

Hello, I have a server with QT installed. It is not the latest version, but this is a critical server and can not upgrade it on the fly (and besides that, is at 500km). I´m using the following versions: maildrop-toaster-1.8.1-1.2.10 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.2.9 maildrop-toaster-devel-1.8.1-1.2.10

Re: [qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

Samuel Díaz García wrote: This is an example recived from ezmlm from qmailtoaster-list. The account samueldg (the mine) is working fine. The problem I can see is that line where you can read: "Remote host said: 451 qq unable to read configuration (#4.3.0)" That should be the problem? Any help

[qmailtoaster] [Fwd: ezmlm warning] [was Re: [qmailtoaster] Many bounces? Please help!]

This is an example recived from ezmlm from qmailtoaster-list. The account samueldg (the mine) is working fine. The problem I can see is that line where you can read: "Remote host said: 451 qq unable to read configuration (#4.3.0)" That should be the problem? Any help about it? Mensaj

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: updated packages broke my qmail install

Hi Erik, I didn't think of doing that I was in a panic since the upgrade seems to have gone through fine. All is well now though after re-installing the older packages. Can I just upgrade spamassassin by itself? Since I would like that security update. On 6/12/06, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

Luckily I do have a backup. I also had the older packages before the upgrade and re-installed the whole thing over and restored my backup. So all is up and running now. Not sure what happen but when I was going through the upgrade I didn't see any errors. Thanks for your help. On 6/12/06, Nick Hemm

Re: [qmailtoaster] updated packages broke my qmail install

Ing-Long Eric Kuo (DraconPern) wrote: It seems to have worked. At least I got the test mail I sent just now. Now, the problem is notifying everyone who has sent an email and notifying them that they need resend it again. There's a time stamp in the log file. How do I convert that to an actual

[qmailtoaster] Re: upgrade.sh script

hi nick ^_^, i've tested your upgrade.sh script, and it works well if the ARCH variable is i386 ... but when i change it to i686, it will error, because the rpmbuild command is always use the default i386 value ... example original script : [...cut...] DISTRO=cnt40 ARCH=i386 BDIR=redhat cl

[qmailtoaster] Re: qmailtoaster-list Digest of: thread.4111

hi eric ^_^, i have exactly the same problem with you ... at first, emails from yahoogroups are normally received by qmailtoaster ... but suddenly, around 1 week later, qmailtoaster just reject those emails with "554 mail server permanently rejected message (#5.3.0)" after some googling aroun

[qmailtoaster] badmailfrom bug or feature

I have a small problem with badmailfrom.When I put @t in the file, it is blocking all emails from any domain starting with t...Actually I want it to block only [EMAIL PROTECTED] not, say, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Another thing was also happeningwhen I put .cn , it was blocking emails from use