Re: [qmailtoaster] How to unblock mp3s/ppt files?

2006-10-04 Thread Harry Zink
I'm having some issues where a client of mine is unable to send an enclosure that's a ppt file. In the older version of qmailtoaster (2004 vintage) what's the location to remove this restriction - and is it possible to do so on a domain basis (i.e. only have that client changed)? Harry

RE: [qmailtoaster] How to unblock mp3s/ppt files?

2006-10-04 Thread Craig Smith
Simscan controls this in toaster I believe. edit /var/qmail/control/simcontrol and adjust the attach=, remove mp3 from the list. Then run /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk and do qmailctl restart. That will remove the restriction, but it will be for everyone. I'm not sure if or how you can do it on a p

[qmailtoaster] log report of toaster

2006-10-04 Thread Ho
I had using the guide of www.qmailrocks.org to set up a server before using qmailtoaster . I found that a tool call qmailanalog work together with qlogtool are very useful. It will perform some basic log analysis on those qmail log files and then output them to a desired location and email

Re: [qmailtoaster] How to unblock mp3s/ppt files?

2006-10-04 Thread Jake Vickers
Harry Zink wrote: I'm having some issues where a client of mine is unable to send an enclosure that's a ppt file. In the older version of qmailtoaster (2004 vintage) what's the location to remove this restriction - and is it possible to do so on a domain basis (i.e. only have that client chan

[qmailtoaster] how to block extension in mimetypes

2006-10-04 Thread Thiago - TI - Realeza
Hello fellas... how can I block some type of file extension in /var/qmail/control/badmimetypes ??? my qmail box don´t have the simcontrol file, it´s a older version of qmail. thanks Thiago - QmailToaster hosted by: V

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to block extension in mimetypes

2006-10-04 Thread Jake Vickers
Thiago - TI - Realeza wrote: Hello fellas... how can I block some type of file extension in /var/qmail/control/badmimetypes ??? my qmail box don´t have the simcontrol file, it´s a older version of qmail. thanks Thiago Look at my previous post about unblocking the PPT files. That will giv

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade notes: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.0.15 to qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5

2006-10-04 Thread Peter Peltonen
On 8/22/06, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Don't worry, and don't be nervous. If you're not sure of how to do something, just put it in using plain text and someone will come through and clean it up. Most of my stuff started as copy-n-paste from emails where I (or others) have gone back

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade notes: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.0.15 to qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5

2006-10-04 Thread Jake Vickers
Peter Peltonen wrote: On 8/22/06, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Don't worry, and don't be nervous. If you're not sure of how to do something, just put it in using plain text and someone will come through and clean it up. Most of my stuff started as copy-n-paste from emails where I (or

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade notes: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.0.15 to qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Peter Peltonen wrote: > On 8/22/06, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Don't worry, and don't be nervous. If you're not sure of how to do >> something, just put it in using plain text and someone will come through >> and clean it up. Most of my stuff started as copy-n-paste from emails >> w

Re: [qmailtoaster] upgrade notes: qmail-toaster-1.03-1.0.15 to qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.5

2006-10-04 Thread Peter Peltonen
On 10/4/06, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Peltonen wrote: > Okay, I've finally got my notes to the wiki: > > http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Upgrading%28Obsolete%29 > Nice job, Peter. Just a couple observations: Thanks for reading through the notes. 1) You mention /var

[qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
Hello all,       I’m new to qmail toaster, not new to qmail. I have a centos install of qmail toaster. I would say that about 20% of all email destined for the server gets dropped by qmail-smtpd, which exites with code 11 according to tcpserver. I cannot determine why this is happ

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Jared Markell
I've had very similar issues. I was testing the load performance of my qmailtoaster machine. I had my web server email 400 unique emails to my account, I only received a measly 100 or so of them. During the "mass mail", pop3 became unresponsive for me and other customers until all the mails

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
I’ve been able to move 100,000 messages into a single mailbox in one day, they all got there with no problems, however, they came from a lan computer on the same network. I fear that there is something else afoot. I really don’t want to have to rip this out and install manually, qmailtoaste

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread buffalo
> In that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to > believe that it isn't an issue with the content of the message killing > qmail-smtpd, but rather the source in which it is coming from. Has > anyone seen this or know about it? Can't say I've seen this exact same problem, but

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
I don't think that's the case because I'm not getting it now that all mail comes from the my postfix machine. Keep in mind that the postfix machine IS NOT given any special tcp.smtp rules. What I want to know is how to disable chkuser (I've tried all the documented methods and it doesn't disable i

Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Peter Peltonen
On 10/4/06, Chris Godwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I also want to know what the BADMIMETYPE and BADLOADERTYPE directives in tcp.smtp control, or what do they do? They block messages with specific type of attachments (by the attachment's MIME type and not by file extension like simscan does). I

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
I've done this by removing those directives from the rules. Is that the correct action, such software sometimes has a default if there is not explicit value set. Chris Godwin Linux/Unix Consultant Network Logistic, Inc. Get help at http://www.networklogistic.com/help -Original Message- F

Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
This is indeed strange, Chris. Is this a fresh CentOS 4.4 install? Fresh toaster (what versions)? Is the postfix machine on a remote domain (from the toaster's viewpoint)? Chris Godwin wrote: > I don't think that's the case because I'm not getting it now that all > mail comes from the my postfix m

[qmailtoaster] whitelisting using user_prefs

2006-10-04 Thread Matt Decker
I'm having trouble finding out how/if I can use user_pref files to handle whitelisting instead of using local.cf. It seems like everything I see on this mailing list and in the Qmail Toaster Wiki is all about using local.cf. I also noticed that suggestions on how to use sa-learn on here never

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
Yes, I'm using centos 4.4, toaster versions are as below (They were current when the install took place): rwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 Sep 6 14:38 . drwxr-xr-x 4 root root4096 Sep 1 16:38 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17662 Sep 1 19:52 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.1.src.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1

Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Chris Godwin wrote: > Yes, I'm using centos 4.4, toaster versions are as below (They were > current when the install took place): > I'd rather see: # rpm -qa | grep toaster ;) -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.1 maildrop-toaster-2.0.2-1.3.1 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.8-1.3.3 simscan-toaster-1.2-1.3.1 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.5 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.1 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.1 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.1-1.3.2 control-panel-toaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Erik Espinoza
I'd have to agree with Duncan. I'd recommend running memtest on this machine. Erik On 10/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to > believe that it isn't an issue with the content of the message killing > qmail-smtp

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
Ready for the twist? I'm running a drbd cluster of two of these machines. I'm failing over with heartbeat and drbd. I have used this setup with qmr with no problems. So the issue is happening on both machines on brand new ibm hardware. I've initiated a failover to the second machine so it is handl

Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
recordio should give you a hint. I'm guessing that it might be RBL/DNS related. Are you running a caching DNS server? If running bind, what does # service named status tell you? Chris Godwin wrote: > Ready for the twist? > > I'm running a drbd cluster of two of these machines. I'm failing over >

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
How do I use recordio in the supervise scripts? I am not running a caching nameserver on the qmail server itself. The name servers were using in resolv.conf is 4.2.2.2 and 4.2.2.1 which are root servers. Chris Godwin Linux/Unix Consultant Network Logistic, Inc. Get help at http://www.networklogis

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
I just setup recordio and had no idea of its existence. Thank you so much... with this I should be able to troubleshoot. Chris Godwin Linux/Unix Consultant Network Logistic, Inc. Get help at http://www.networklogistic.com/help -Original Message- From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Chris Godwin wrote: > How do I use recordio in the supervise scripts? I see you have it going now. I think you missed some (most) of what I posted at 9:17. Glad you got it going. > I am not running a caching nameserver on the qmail server itself. The > name servers were using in resolv.conf is 4.

Re: [qmailtoaster] how to block extension in mimetypes

2006-10-04 Thread Harry Zink
As Jake answered my identical query less than 9 minutes prior: ---Jake Vickers wrote--- In that version, the signature will be block via badmimetypes or badloadertypes. The signatures in badmimetypes have to match the first few characters in the MIME type (attachment). badloadertypes is the o

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
I didn't get it going at all. BUT I FOUND THE PROBLEM!!! YAY! Here's what the conversation says: Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1). Escape character is '^]'. EHLO220 ha.fqdn - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP LOCALHOST 250-ha.fqdn - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.

RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
This is weird it dies immediately without reading the cert or anything: 250-STARTTLS 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 20971520 250 AUTH LOGIN PLAIN CRAM-MD5 ) = 170 select(1, [0], NULL, NULL, {1200, 0}starttls ) = 1 (in [0], left {1196, 233000}) read(0, "starttls\n", 1024) = 9 br

[qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
When I do this:   /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 220 ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP ehlo 250-ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server 250-STARTTLS 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 20971520 250 AUTH LOGIN P

Re: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Erik Espinoza
do an 'ls -al /var/qmail/control/*.pem" Thanks, Erik On 10/4/06, Chris Godwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I do this: /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 220 ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server ESMTP ehlo 250-ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toast

RE: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 14 Sep 15 19:24 /var/qmail/control/clientcert.pem -> servercert.pem -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 245 Oct 4 01:01 /var/qmail/control/dh1024.pem -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 156 Oct 4 01:01 /var/qmail/control/dh512.pem -rw-r--r-- 1 root qmail 493 Oct 4 01:01

Re: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Is this a 64-bit machine? What did you use for ARCH= value in cnt40-install-script.sh? Chris Godwin wrote: > When I do this: > > > > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > > 220 ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP > Server ESMTP > > ehlo > > 250-ha.networklogistic.net - We

RE: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
i386 I have reinstalled just that rpm via the following commands: rpm -Uvh $QMLT cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS sed 's/sleep 5/nano \/usr\/src\/redhat\/BUILD\/qmail-1.03\/chkuser_settings.h/g' qmail-toaster.spec > qmail-toaster.spec2 || exit 1 mv qmail-toaster.spec2 qmail-toaster.spec rpmbuild

Re: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
It doesn't appear that ckhuser is your problem, so I'd not change chkuser_settings.h. That will simplify things a bit. The problem appears to be with TLS. First thing, I'd get back to the standard toaster: # qmailctl stop # rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt40 --target `uname -m` $QMLT # rpm -Uvh --re

RE: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
Well actually I have to change chkuser in order to disallow sender_mx checking. This is to enable email from hosts on our network that send out cron emails but have no mx records. Chris Godwin Linux/Unix Consultant Network Logistic, Inc. Get help at http://www.networklogistic.com/help -Origi

Re: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Ok, so be it. I'm no expert at reading an strace, but let's have a look at it again: select(1, [0], NULL, NULL, {1154, 135000}) = 1 (in [0], left {1146, 148000}) read(0, "ehlo localhost\r\n", 1024) = 16 stat64("control/servercert.pem", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0777, st_size=1689, ...}) = 0 select(2,

RE: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Chris Godwin
Yes but the memory address changes when do a second and third strace. Chris Godwin Linux/Unix Consultant Network Logistic, Inc. Get help at http://www.networklogistic.com/help -Original Message- From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:04 PM To:

Re: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Ok, I think I have a hint. I ran strace on qmail-smtpd on a working server, and I get: select(1, [0], NULL, NULL, {60, 0}starttls ) = 1 (in [0], left {34, 70}) read(0, "starttls\n", 1024) = 9 open("control/servercert.pem", O_RDONLY) = 3 fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size

Re: [qmailtoaster] STARTTLS Segmentation Fault

2006-10-04 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Chris Godwin wrote: > > When I do this: > > > > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > > 220 ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP > Server ESMTP > > ehlo > > 250-ha.networklogistic.net - Welcome to Qmail Toaster Ver. 1.3 SMTP Server > > 250-STARTTLS > > 250-PIPELINING > > 250-8BI

Re: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

2006-10-04 Thread Jake Vickers
Chris Godwin wrote: Hello all,       I’m new to qmail toaster, not new to qmail. I have a centos install of qmail toaster. I would say that about 20% of all email destined for the server gets dropped by qmail-smtpd, which exites with code 11 according to tcpserver

[qmailtoaster] need help... couriertls: @localstatedir@/couriersslcache: No such file or directory

2006-10-04 Thread Yi-Lei Wu
Hi list,In my pop3 log, I keep on seeing this message:couriertls: @localstatedir@/couriersslcache: No such file or directoryCan anyone tell me what's wrong and how to fix this?Thanks. Best regards,Peter Wu