[qmailtoaster] upgrade script

I have just successfully upgrade my FC4 installation to fix the Spamhaus PBL issue my users are having. I however ran into one problem with the upgrade.sh script. The libsrs2-toaster package was not in the script, but once I added it and reran the upgrade.sh script, my qmail-toaster install is up

RE: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Hey Eric, I guess that this mess with the conf file is justified with a previous post I made during the week-end or maybe last week: when I Upgraded to 0.90 with a rpm -Uvh it did not automatically remove the 0.88.7. I had manually de-install it with a rpm -e --nodeps... It looks everything

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Hey Fernando, You're right. The clamd.conf.rpmsave would have been created when you removed the old clamd. The clamd.conf.rpmnew would have been created by the upgrade if there was already a clam.conf file. How you ended up with an rpmnew and no clamd.conf, I'm not quite sure. I'd try using the rp

RE: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Hello Eric (and list), After coorecting the conf file (as suspected) clamav is running without any problems: just got :2007-02-26 22:52:14.767787500 qmail-smtpd: qq hard reject (Your email was rejected because it contains the Eicar-Test-Signature virus): MAILFROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Good news: I found out why messages are being duplicated. The new output.c module in clamav has a new logg_foreground setting (enabled in the toaster) which sends log output to stdout. The toaster used to use a patched capability (still in there) which allows for specifying "stderr" as the log fil

RE: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Hello Eric, This thing has triggered for some other strange things... I believe that clamav is not running at all in the machine I used for the log bellow... I've just sent an EICAR test for it, /var/log/qmail/clamav/current says nothing... and oddly enough I get this line in /var/log/qmail

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Thanks, slamp. Me too. I'd love to hear some suggestions, even if they're just SWAGs! slamp slamp wrote: > I have clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 with no problems either. this was an > upgrade from the rc. but i do see duplicates in my log. the oldest i > have for logs are from 2/14. i am curious as t

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

I have clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 with no problems either. this was an upgrade from the rc. but i do see duplicates in my log. the oldest i have for logs are from 2/14. i am curious as to why the logs are duplicated. On 2/26/07, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: >

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Eric "Shubes" wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

That would be a "yes". ;) Glenn Remstedt wrote: > a output from my /var/log/qmail/clamd/current > > . > . > . > > @400045e2d66333c0c974 > /var/qmail/simscan/1172493913.298866.2941/textfile1:OK > @400045e2fccb37f785b4 No stats for Database check - forcing reload > @400045e2fccb37f80e

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Hey FA, Are you seeing any duplicate messages in your clamd log? Is your volume of messages very high? Thanks. Fernando Azevedo wrote: > Hi list, > > Hope this is of help: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep toas

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Philip Nix Guru wrote: > Eric "Shubes" wrote: >> Philip Nix Guru wrote: >> >>> Eric "Shubes" wrote: >>> Philip Nix Guru wrote: > Eric "Shubes" wrote: > >> We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using >> clamav-toaster-0.90-

RE: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Hi list, Hope this is of help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep toaster | sort error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#1503 Header V3 DSA signature: BAD, key ID 4f2a6fd2 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.2 clamav-toaster-0.9

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

a output from my /var/log/qmail/clamd/current . . . @400045e2d66333c0c974 /var/qmail/simscan/1172493913.298866.2941/textfile1:OK @400045e2fccb37f785b4 No stats for Database check - forcing reload @400045e2fccb37f80e6c No stats for Database check - forcing reload @400045e2fccb37f81

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Eric "Shubes" wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you kindly reply and

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Thanks Glenn. Any duplicated messages in the clamd log? Glenn Remstedt wrote: > hi, > > I've the clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 just installed yesterday on a FC5, > do not see any problem. But do let me know what you need to see - any > log-files ...? > > G. > > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:01 -0700,

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

hi, I've the clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 just installed yesterday on a FC5, do not see any problem. But do let me know what you need to see - any log-files ...? G. On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:01 -0700, Eric "Shubes" wrote: > We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using > clamav-

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Philip Nix Guru wrote: > Eric "Shubes" wrote: >> Philip Nix Guru wrote: >> >>> Eric "Shubes" wrote: >>> We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you kindly reply and let us know? >

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Eric "Shubes" wrote: Philip Nix Guru wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you kindly reply and let us know? Thanks. Hello I am using clamav-toaster-

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Philip Nix Guru wrote: > Eric "Shubes" wrote: >> We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using >> clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you >> kindly reply and let us know? >> >> Thanks. >> >> > Hello > I am using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 on 3

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Eric "Shubes" wrote: We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you kindly reply and let us know? Thanks. Hello I am using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 on 3 diff systems 2 x FC5 and 1 x Centos 4.4 No p

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

We're trying to get a handle on this problem. If anyone is using clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 and is *not* experiencing a problem, will you kindly reply and let us know? Thanks. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Peter Peltonen wrote: > On 2/26/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Any news on your situation? Can you tell if the scans that hung up were >> incoming or outgoing? > > I have no idea. I can switch my clamd back on, so we can find out. But > how do I get more information about the scans

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Peter Peltonen wrote: > BTW: Maybe `service qmail restart` should sighup *all* the > qmailtoaster related processes? I've often thought the same thing. > Is there a reason it does not do so at the moment? I don't honestly know why it is done the way it is. I'd like to see some enhancements done

RE: [qmailtoaster] Check User

I haven't tested this but if you're willing to modify the "C" code, in qmail-smtpd.c search for the following two comments: /* start chkuser code */ /* end chkuser code */ Deleteing all lines from the start comment to the end comment will remove the chkuser functionality. Regards, Tim -Orig

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

On 2/26/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any news on your situation? Can you tell if the scans that hung up were incoming or outgoing? I have no idea. I can switch my clamd back on, so we can find out. But how do I get more information about the scans that are hanging? Regards, Peter

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

On 2/26/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the report, Peter. I'm sure it'll help with tracking this problem down. You are welcome. Restarting qmail (via qmailctl restart or service qmail restart, they're the same thing) does not restart *everything*. It only recycles qmail

RE: [qmailtoaster] Spam Score questions

Steve, I think you'll get the scoring you want if you modify the lines as follows: score SARE_ADULT2 BODY 8.0 score BAYES_99 10.0 Regards, Tim From: Steve Ingraham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:54 AM To: users@spamassassin

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Peter (and others with this problem), I've done some testing on the new toaster I just built. The only symptom I've seen is the duplicated clamd log messages. Inbound messages have scanned ok, and clamdscan terminated normally (afaict). Any news on your situation? Can you tell if the scans that h

[qmailtoaster] Spam Score questions

I have a couple of questions concerning the below header information. This is a spam that one of my users received this morning. My questions pertain to the rule scores. First question, this spam hit on the SARE_ADULT2 BODY rule but it only received a score of 1.0. I assume this rule is looking

Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGES: isoqlog-toaster, spamassassin-toaster

On 2/26/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eric "Shubes" wrote: > I'm no expert with this, but I would think that the following rule should > have assigned a negative value: > > * 4.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > > In spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6, I see the rul

RE: [qmailtoaster] domainkey problems

Still having problems with this... Does anyone have any more ideas? -- Brian Trudeau, Network Administrator Eastek International Corporation 330 Hastings Drive, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 Tel: (847) 353-8300 Ext. 213 Fax: (847) 353-8900 Web: http://www.eastek-intl.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail - "spam_buttons"-plugins

thanks - that made it work! glenn. On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 08:53 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote: > Glenn Remstedt wrote: > > I've installed the "squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a" on a FC5, and will in > > there install the spam_buttons-plugin, but I realized that I do have > > two(2) dir with Squirrelmail in

Re: [qmailtoaster] Check User

Bilgehan Poyraz wrote: > Is it possible QmailToaster packages install without chkuser package? Not very easily. > I Want to only one line in tcp.smtp file... Why?? > > Bilgehan POYRAZ > APTEC TURKEY > CA Technical Support > -- -Eric 'shubes'

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Peter, One more thing. If at all possible, it'd be great if you could refrain from backing off the update for a little bit. That way if the fix ends up being a relatively simply tweak, we'll have a machine to try it out on right away. Thanks. -- -Eric 'shubes' -

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

Thanks for the report, Peter. I'm sure it'll help with tracking this problem down. A few thoughts come to mind (first thing in the morning, so I hope I'm awake!): Restarting qmail (via qmailctl restart or service qmail restart, they're the same thing) does not restart *everything*. It only recycl

Re: [qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail - "spam_buttons"-plugins

Glenn Remstedt wrote: I've installed the "squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a" on a FC5, and will in there install the spam_buttons-plugin, but I realized that I do have two(2) dir with Squirrelmail installed, /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail- toaster-1.4.9a/ and /usr/share/squirrelmail/ so, in where should

[qmailtoaster] Squirrelmail - "spam_buttons"-plugins

I've installed the "squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a" on a FC5, and will in there install the spam_buttons-plugin, but I realized that I do have two(2) dir with Squirrelmail installed, /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail- toaster-1.4.9a/ and /usr/share/squirrelmail/ so, in where should I install the plugin and

Re: [qmailtoaster] spamd and attachments behaviour?

L. A. wrote: Hi :) Today I try new qt installation from packages on main site, one domain was added and /var/qmail/control/databytes changed to 10485760. Then i take my another mailserver and send some simple mail to my new qt. Looks good in logs, it comes through spamd and clamd and goto my m

Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem with mail adress incorrect

Thank Quinn, this solve my problem. In my case i have install in a SUSE 10.1and i have make a change in the procedure tha in http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Chkuser Here is the procedure to Suse 10.1 # rpm -Uvh qmail-toaster*.src.rpm # cd /usr/src/packages/SPECS edit qmail-toaster.spec.

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

On 2/26/07, Peter Peltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 12:50 the situation is: 8 clamdscan processes eating 100 % cpu I notice that freshclam is not running: # service freshclam status freshclam dead but subsys locked All I see in freshclam log are messages like this: Received signal: wake

Re: [qmailtoaster] DEVEL PACKAGES: isoqlog-toaster, spamassassin-toaster

Eric "Shubes" wrote: I'm no expert with this, but I would think that the following rule should have assigned a negative value: * 4.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list In spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6, I see the rule for AWL in /usr/share/spamassassin/60_awl.cf, but I don't see

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

At 12:50 the situation is: 8 clamdscan processes eating 100 % cpu I notice that freshclam is not running: # service freshclam status freshclam dead but subsys locked All I see in freshclam log are messages like this: Received signal: wake up ClamAV update process started at Mon Feb 26 10:40:41

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

After restart I have now experienced that clamd processes are eating up all CPU (2,8GHz HT P4): PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 1321 clamav25 0 49292 46M 1616 R30.1 4.7 2:08 0 clamd 31064 clamav25 0 49292 46M 1616 R29.1 4.7 13

Re: [qmailtoaster] clamav upgrade problem with supervise/lock

I seem to have similiar problems with the new clamav which I've been running for a few days now. This morning I found out that my mail server was not responding: no new emails came through, and nothing was in smtp logs. When checking process list, I saw tens and tens of clamav processes like this

[qmailtoaster] Check User

Is it possible QmailToaster packages install without chkuser package? I Want to only one line in tcp.smtp file... Bilgehan POYRAZ APTEC TURKEY CA Technical Support - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted