[qmailtoaster] Re: Spambox troubles

2010-07-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Patrick Ring wrote: I said "so it stays" because I have been trying to use the Squirrelmail "Move" function to move the messages into the Inbox. However, it looks like they've moved, but when you check the Inbox the message(s) is/are not there. Clicking back on the Spam folder reveals they are

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Spambox troubles

2010-07-28 Thread Patrick Ring
I said "so it stays" because I have been trying to use the Squirrelmail "Move" function to move the messages into the Inbox. However, it looks like they've moved, but when you check the Inbox the message(s) is/are not there. Clicking back on the Spam folder reveals they are right back there. I c

[qmailtoaster] Re: Spambox troubles

2010-07-28 Thread Eric Shubert
Patrick Ring wrote: Once an email gets "marked" as spam and placed in the .spam box, what must one do to move it out so it stays in the Inbox? The simplest way is to use squirrelmail/webmail (imap). The spambox feature isn't intended to be used with pop3. It's a feature that works well with im

RE: [qmailtoaster] Spambox troubles

2010-07-28 Thread Patrick Ring
Once an email gets "marked" as spam and placed in the .spam box, what must one do to move it out so it stays in the Inbox? The only thing I can do is move the mail to another folder, but my users use POP3 and really don't want to use the webmailer. (I'm hoping to bypass alot of this when I depl

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: vpopmail to old

2010-07-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadły
Dnia 2010-07-28, śro o godzinie 10:28 -0700, Eric Shubert pisze: > I'm thrilled to see Aleksander and Lucian working this out. > Can we take this to the devel list? ;) Yes, you can. -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid: a...@jabber.westside.kielce.pl I

[qmailtoaster] Re: vpopmail to old

2010-07-28 Thread Eric Shubert
I'm thrilled to see Aleksander and Lucian working this out. Can we take this to the devel list? ;) Lucian Cristian wrote: about that real install I was talking when I spoken about backend cleanup, if the files are not found in the mentioned place, vpopmail will complain that no backend is ins

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: vpopmail to old

2010-07-28 Thread Lucian Cristian
about that real install I was talking when I spoken about backend cleanup, if the files are not found in the mentioned place, vpopmail will complain that no backend is installed, of course there may be a workaround like qmail fake install.. Regards Lucian On 28.07.2010 17:38, Aleksander Pods

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: vpopmail to old

2010-07-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadły
Dnia 2010-07-28, śro o godzinie 16:38 +0200, Aleksander Podsiadły pisze: > ln -s %{vdir}/lib/vmysql.so > %{buildroot}%{vdir}/etc/vpopmail/vpopmail.authmodule Should be without "vpopmail/" like in my patch. -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Aleksander Podsiadły mail: a...@westside.kielce.pl jid: a...@jab

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: vpopmail to old

2010-07-28 Thread Aleksander Podsiadły
Dnia 2010-07-28, śro o godzinie 12:44 +0300, Lucian Cristian pisze: > +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{mylibdir} > +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{vdir}/etc/vpopmail > +make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install > +make install > + > +rm -f %{buildroot}%{vdir}/etc/vpopmail/vpopmail.authmodule > +ln -s %{mylibdir}/vmysql.so

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: vpopmail to old

2010-07-28 Thread Jake Vickers
On 07/28/2010 05:44 AM, Lucian Cristian wrote: here is a patch for vpopmail 5.5.0 spec based on 4.5.17 build (it needs backend cleanup if you only want to compile it on other system) Thanks Lucian - I have not gotten to vpopmail yet on v2, but this will save me time, as well as help out thos

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: vpopmail to old

2010-07-28 Thread Lucian Cristian
here is a patch for vpopmail 5.5.0 spec based on 4.5.17 build (it needs backend cleanup if you only want to compile it on other system) --- vpopmail-toaster.spec.old 2009-06-12 05:38:38.0 +0300 +++ vpopmail-toaster.spec 2010-07-28 12:41:55.0 +0300 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ %defin