Hello ppl.
I am getting my self more and more into QMT and learning it every day. Cool
solution.
Today I were trying to get DomainKeys and DKIM both sign out. I need this,
the reason, don't matter.
I got first DomainKeys setup following the WIKI QMT pages. But I didn't test
it.
Then I w
Just some info for when you take a look at this:
(1) The mirror at 109.74.205.92 is accepting connections but the files
cannot be retrieved.
(2) The mirror at 184.105.242.76 appears to not be accepting connections
at all.
I use a customized script that installs from the srpms (had to change
I updated clamav through qtp-newmodel and everything went fine. I'm
still getting a warning message through logwatch saying that clamav is
out of date. This is the message...
Last Status:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.97.4 Recommended version
SPF its just DNS entries nothing to do with QmailToaster.
Yes I am on the same situation where DomainKeys are not been sign but
DKIM are, but SPF+DKIM is more than enough for me agains Google, Hotmail
and Yahoo.
Saludos,
Ernesto Vargas
On 06/15/2012 01:21 AM, F. Mendez wrote:
> Hello ppl.
>
>
I was on the qmailtoaster mailing list and I have not gotten an email
from the mailing list since May 20th. I tried to resubscribe, but still
have not gotten anything. What's up?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-un
On 06/15/2012 07:46 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote:
I updated clamav through qtp-newmodel and everything went fine. I'm
still getting a warning message through logwatch saying that clamav is
out of date. This is the message...
Last Status:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local ver
On 06/15/2012 08:07 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote:
I was on the qmailtoaster mailing list and I have not gotten an email
from the mailing list since May 20th. I tried to resubscribe, but still
have not gotten anything. What's up?
-
Yo
It's better to use spamdyke to do this (block and whitelist).
Spamdyke has much more flexibility.
If you don't have spamdyke installed yet, you should do so. It will be
included in the stock QMT at some point.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 06/15/2012 10:01 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote:
I'm using the tcp.smt
The thing I'm worried about is our mail server is used by our customers
that want to send pages through our system. There are hundreds of
emails that get processed everyday and I can't get all of them into the
whitelist. The pages are very important to emergency services. I don't
want to ina
On 06/15/2012 11:28 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote:
The thing I'm worried about is our mail server is used by our customers
that want to send pages through our system. There are hundreds of emails
that get processed everyday and I can't get all of them into the
whitelist. The pages are very important to e
I will look into it. Thanks for the help.
On 6/15/2012 3:20 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 06/15/2012 11:28 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote:
The thing I'm worried about is our mail server is used by our customers
that want to send pages through our system. There are hundreds of emails
that get processed eve
Raja, please send emails to just the list address:
qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com.
There appears to be a problem presently with a couple of the mirrors, as
Ron posted earlier today. We have 7 mirrors presently, and there is a
problem with 2 of them.
We'll get the 2 problem mirrors fixed a
Raja try the script below. --Ron
- cut here: current-download-script-with-retry.sh -
#!/bin/sh
#
#
# Modified version of Qmail Toaster current-download-script.sh
#
# Some of the servers listed in mirrors.qmailtoaster.com either do not
# respond or cannot serve the files. This script keep
Thanks Ron.
The appropriate admins have been notified, and I expect them to be
working again fairly soon.
FWIW, there are some additional enhancements I'd like to make to the
download scripting as well, such as using sha1sum to validate the
file(s). If someone would like to work on this, hop
On 06/15/2012 08:41 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 06/15/2012 07:46 AM, Mike Tirpak wrote:
I updated clamav through qtp-newmodel and everything went fine. I'm
still getting a warning message through logwatch saying that clamav is
out of date. This is the message...
Last Status:
WARNING: Your ClamAV
Hello,
just wondering on how to fix clamav installation on centos 6 64bit and also
when will QMT will support centos 6?
Thanks.
-Mensaje original-
From: Eric Shubert
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 6:14 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav Logwa
Hello Ernesto,
did you EVER had DomainKeys working? I mean, did you test it before
installing changes for DKIM?
Because if you had it working before installing DKIM, this means that the
file change on DKIM setup is the one that is not signing.
Hopefully some of the "creators" of QMT may arise
Pump!
From: Natalio Gatti
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 3:03 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Help request to comunity on tech issue.
Here we (I) go.
You have two options to change your outbound IP address via iptables in the
same box where QMT is runni
On 06/15/2012 05:23 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
Hello,
just wondering on how to fix clamav installation on centos 6 64bit and
Clamav is still working on this. I would install 0.97.4 if you need it
right away. I'd probably do that in any case. If there's a problem with
0.97.4 on Cos6x64, I'm not awa
The stock domainkeys (qmail-dk) process has never worked 100%. I expect
that we'll be removing that implementation at some point in the future.
DKIM will be included in the stock QMT at some point, but I can't say
when. I'm not optimistic that a working DK will ever be included. Why
would anyon
F. Mendez & Eric,
There is no functionality issue with clamav on CentOS 6, either i686 or
x86_64, but there is indeed a build issue. There is a patch file that
patches the clamd.conf and freshclam.conf files with some QMT changes,
and the build of clamav fails when trying to apply this patch.
On 06/15/2012 06:21 PM, Ron Pacheco wrote:
F. Mendez & Eric,
There is no functionality issue with clamav on CentOS 6, either i686 or
x86_64, but there is indeed a build issue. There is a patch file that
patches the clamd.conf and freshclam.conf files with some QMT changes,
and the build of clama
Because a lot of mail server this days still use and checks for domainkeys
and not only dkim. In fact, even BIG isp checks for both.
We need to have and offer 100% all possible checks for domain certification
email traffic.
Regards.
-Mensaje original-
From: Eric Shubert
Sent:
23 matches
Mail list logo
