[qmailtoaster] Re: SSO Facility with Samba4 Query

2013-12-02 Thread Pak Ogah
On 12/2/2013 2:17 PM, Vijay Thakur wrote: Hi, I have read your thread in Qmail Mailing List. You have successfully implemented Single Sing on facility in your network. Will you share your setup in detail and setup document or web reference to create this setup for my Corporate requirement.

[qmailtoaster] Re: Auto password change notification

2013-12-02 Thread Eric Shubert
On 12/01/2013 11:37 PM, Pak Ogah wrote: On 11/29/2013 11:32 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: Untitled That's neat. I wouldn't consider it a practical change for the base QMT though, as it's not generic enough. For example, how would it be implemented with an LDAP backend? I hope to have an

[qmailtoaster] Re: Outlook 2013 IMAP folder rename problem - Outlook 2013 is just plain BROKEN

2013-12-02 Thread Dan McAllister
Sorry I'm so late on this one -- I took a 4-day weekend for the Thanksgiving holiday! :-) I have bad news RE: _*Outlook 2013*_ and IMAP -- its _*broken*_, and MS hasn't given any real signs (yet) that they're keen on fixing it. I'm sure by now you've Google'd IMAP and Outlook 2013 -- and you

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Load-balancing in SMTP route

2013-12-02 Thread Dan McAllister
Load balancing on outbound traffic is most commonly done with iptables. See: http://blog.khax.net/2009/12/01/multi-gateway-balancing-with-iptables/ for some help... Dan McAllister IT4SOHO On 11/29/2013 6:11 AM, Pak Ogah wrote: On 10/29/2013 2:24 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: I think Amit's

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Outlook 2013 IMAP folder rename problem - Outlook 2013 is just plain BROKEN

2013-12-02 Thread Eric Broch
Dan and list members, Outlook 2013 also removes header information when copying/moving from the INBOX to another IMAP folder. This is not good if you're training a spam filter. It screwed up our DSPAM database and we had to start over rebuilding the database from scratch. Eric On 12/2/2013 9:33

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Outlook 2013 IMAP folder rename problem - Outlook 2013 is just plain BROKEN

2013-12-02 Thread Dan McAllister
OUCH! That has tons of implications in all kinds of arenas -- not just SPAM detection and control! I'm thinking compliance and record keeping issues here! I'll have to look into that some more, and warn my clients in the legal and medical fields! Thanks for the input! Dan IT4SOHO On