Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Outlook goes offline

Q: Did you ever try to turn off the backup? Does the problem persist? Johannes Am 14.03.14 05:25, schrieb Linux: Please go through the following points, 1. I am using dovecot IMAP. 2. In my office, there are about 50 outlooks configured with IMAP, and all goes offline in every 10 min. 3. dov

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Outlook goes offline

Please go through the following points, 1. I am using dovecot IMAP. 2. In my office, there are about 50 outlooks configured with IMAP, and all goes offline in every 10 min. 3. dovecot -n # 2.0.17 (684381041dc4+): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.18-164.el5 x86_64 CentOS release 5.8 (Fin

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

On 3/13/2014 5:33 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > On 03/13/2014 03:35 PM, Eric Broch wrote: >> On 3/13/2014 3:12 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: >>> I prefer scanning during the smtp session as well, as it elimintates >>> the bounce and possible backscatter. >>> >>> I don't recall for sure off hand which of SA o

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

What's the security plugin do? I don't have that one. Also, did you not use yum to install the .qt. packages initially? Thanks. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 03/13/2014 05:15 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Plugins=1 in my yum.conf yum check-update : Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security Loadi

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

Plugins=1 in my yum.conf yum check-update : Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Only repos with priorities are the qmailtoaster ones - and there's nothing speciel about the host - it's at virtuel box, centos6.5 with latest qmailtoa

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

On 03/13/2014 04:49 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: I can for sure say that I did not change it until now where I checked the repos and the settings. So - yes You need to enabled it - but be aware that it may confuse people if other repos are not prioritized properly and that yum then reports how many fi

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

That's the latest all right. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 03/13/2014 04:55 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Here's the result : qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch / Den 14-03-2014 00:51, Eric Shubert skrev: That's probably the latest then. # rpm -q qmailtoaster-release The date on the symlinks is t

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

That shouldn't be a problem unless someone's already using the priorities plugin, which is very unlikely. Having no priorities= line in the repo file defaults to the lowest priority. I would have expected this problem to have reared its head before now. I sure don't remember enabling the prior

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

Here's the result : qmailtoaster-release-2.0-1.qt.nodist.noarch / Den 14-03-2014 00:51, Eric Shubert skrev: That's probably the latest then. # rpm -q qmailtoaster-release The date on the symlinks is the date it was installed. There's no way to tell what the distro is going to be when the pac

[qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

Interesting. Thanks. We'll need to give this careful consideration. -- -Eric 'shubes' On 03/13/2014 11:27 AM, Eric Broch wrote: Here's the state of DSPAM: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/dspam/index.php?title=Change_of_ownership On 3/13/2014 10:33 AM, Helmut Fritz wrote: My point was

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

That's probably the latest then. # rpm -q qmailtoaster-release The date on the symlinks is the date it was installed. There's no way to tell what the distro is going to be when the package is built (hence nodist), so the symlinks are created in the %post section of the rpm when the package is

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

I can for sure say that I did not change it until now where I checked the repos and the settings. So - yes You need to enabled it - but be aware that it may confuse people if other repos are not prioritized properly and that yum then reports how many files are NOT updated due to different sett

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

On 03/13/2014 04:32 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Hi Eric. I have found that my /etc/yum/pluginconf.f/priorities.conf was disabled (enabled = 0). Changing this to enable = 1 I do not get clamav udates from EPEL or rpmforge anymore but a notification that packages are excluded due to repository priorit

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

I have both. They are dated january 29 (only version# I can think of) and both seems to have okay symlinks qmailtoaster-dist.repo -> ../../opt/qmailtoaster-release/etc/qmailtoaster-centos.repo qmailtoaster-nodist.repo -> ../../opt/qmailtoaster-release/etc/qmailtoaster-nodist.repo /Finn De

[qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

On 03/13/2014 03:35 PM, Eric Broch wrote: On 3/13/2014 3:12 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: I prefer scanning during the smtp session as well, as it elimintates the bounce and possible backscatter. I don't recall for sure off hand which of SA or DSPAM is better at global vs user oriented scanning. My t

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

Hi Eric. I have found that my /etc/yum/pluginconf.f/priorities.conf was disabled (enabled = 0). Changing this to enable = 1 I do not get clamav udates from EPEL or rpmforge anymore but a notification that packages are excluded due to repository priority protections. I guess this is the fu

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

Which version of qmailtoaster-release do you have? Did your qmailtoaster-dist.repo symlink get removed somehow? It should point to /opt/qmailtoaster-release/etc/qmailtoaster-centos.repo. You should have both dist and nodist .repo symlinks. [root@tacs-mail ~]# ls -l /etc/yum.repos.d/ total 44

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

Hi all. After running yum remove clamav-db yum install simscan (got the proper ones from qmailtoaster) changing tcp.smtp back to contain simscan) I think I'm up running again - at least clamd is back on line, clamav is updating. Thanks for Your help (I'll be back if further problems arise)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

Hi again. I replaced qmailtoaster-nodist.repo with qmailtoaster-dist.repo (changed the enabled key accordingly) Then I issued yum install clamav and it almost succeeded ! Transaction Check Error: file /etc/logrotate.d/freshclam from install of clamav-0.98.1-0.qt.el6.x86_64 conflicts with f

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

I just moved epel out - (After having changed tcp.smtp in order to send mails without simscan ) Then I was trying to yum clamav again and got clamav x86_64 0.98-2.el6.rf from rpmforge - it is removed again This is my qmailtoaster-nodist.repo # current (stable) packages [qmailt

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clamav reinstall - help please

Hi Dan. I get below line when issuing rpm - with or without --nodeps file /etc/logrotate.d/freshclam from install of clamav-0.98.1-0.qt.el6.x86_64 conflicts with file from package clamav-db-0.98.1-1.el6.x86_64 And MORE important my simscan is gone after uninstalling clamav /Finn Den 13

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

On 3/13/2014 3:12 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > I prefer scanning during the smtp session as well, as it elimintates > the bounce and possible backscatter. > > I don't recall for sure off hand which of SA or DSPAM is better at > global vs user oriented scanning. My thinking was to do the global > scan

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

Hmmm. What's in your .repo files for QMT and epel? -- -Eric 'shubes' On 03/13/2014 03:09 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Hi Eric. No it's installed - Package yum-plugin-priorities-1.1.30-17.el6_5.noarch already installed and latest version. /Finn Den 13-03-2014 22:54, Eric Shubert skrev: On 03/13/20

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

Hi Eric. No it's installed - Package yum-plugin-priorities-1.1.30-17.el6_5.noarch already installed and latest version. /Finn Den 13-03-2014 22:54, Eric Shubert skrev: On 03/13/2014 02:39 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Hi. I just issued a yum update and got clamav.x86_64-0.98.1-1.el6 from Epel rep

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

On 03/13/2014 02:39 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Hi. I just issued a yum update and got clamav.x86_64-0.98.1-1.el6 from Epel repository installed. (I pressed 'y' not thinking). It is on my Centos 6.5 latest and greatest qmailtoaster test installation (which is (was) running just fine). So now I'm s

Re: [qmailtoaster] Clamav reinstall - help please

On 3/13/2014 5:39 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Hi. I just issued a yum update and got clamav.x86_64-0.98.1-1.el6 from Epel repository installed. (I pressed 'y' not thinking). It is on my Centos 6.5 latest and greatest qmailtoaster test installation (which is (was) running just fine). So now I'm

[qmailtoaster] Re: Clamav reinstall - help please

On 03/13/2014 02:39 PM, Finn Buhelt wrote: Hi. I just issued a yum update and got clamav.x86_64-0.98.1-1.el6 from Epel repository installed. (I pressed 'y' not thinking). It is on my Centos 6.5 latest and greatest qmailtoaster test installation (which is (was) running just fine). So now I'm s

[qmailtoaster] Clamav reinstall - help please

Hi. I just issued a yum update and got clamav.x86_64-0.98.1-1.el6 from Epel repository installed. (I pressed 'y' not thinking). It is on my Centos 6.5 latest and greatest qmailtoaster test installation (which is (was) running just fine). So now I'm stuck with no clamd running ( my clamd/r

[qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

I prefer scanning during the smtp session as well, as it elimintates the bounce and possible backscatter. I don't recall for sure off hand which of SA or DSPAM is better at global vs user oriented scanning. My thinking was to do the global scan during smtp, and user scan (along with filtering)

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

Here's the state of DSPAM: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/dspam/index.php?title=Change_of_ownership On 3/13/2014 10:33 AM, Helmut Fritz wrote: > > My point was there seem to be unanswered questions on that user list. > people need help and do not get answers. BUT, if enough of us use it

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

Helmut, I agree. Eric On 3/13/2014 10:33 AM, Helmut Fritz wrote: > > My point was there seem to be unanswered questions on that user list. > people need help and do not get answers. BUT, if enough of us use it > I am sure that list would pick up again. J > > > > *From:*Eric Broch [mailto:e

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

My point was there seem to be unanswered questions on that user list. people need help and do not get answers. BUT, if enough of us use it I am sure that list would pick up again. J From: Eric Broch [mailto:ebr...@whitehorsetc.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 12:07 AM To: qmailtoaster-lis

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

Yeah really - I would like to test it, but I think I prefer it as the smtp proxy. I would like to run it on the same machine as qmailtoaster. -Original Message- From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 4:21 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subje

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

On 3/13/2014 5:20 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: > Helmut, mostest I like. :) > > EricB, have you shared your script somewhere yet, or did I miss it? > > Good points, both of you. > > I think DSPAM is most suitably implemented in the delivery process. > While maildrop is included in the COS6 release of QM

[qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--best practices

Thanks Helmut. I do pretty much the same thing. While I use bayes training with SPAM/HAM folders, this isn't very suitable for ISP type installations at this point, as it's server-wide and the SPAM/HAM folders are shared with everyone. We can probably come up with something better when we look

[qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

Helmut, mostest I like. :) EricB, have you shared your script somewhere yet, or did I miss it? Good points, both of you. I think DSPAM is most suitably implemented in the delivery process. While maildrop is included in the COS6 release of QMT, it is being deprecated. QMT will be using dovecot

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Battle SPAM--DSPAM

Helmut, All I can say is that I considered DSPAM for 5 or 6 years and it seemed impregnable, which may be why there's not a lot of help out there and the reason the mailing list is quiet, as the documentation doesn't lend itself to newbies, until I came across this