if the policy file
was missing, policy_check would not be written to the
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current file. Can anyone else verify this to be true?
Dave
slamp slamp wrote:
hey guys, i haven't been able to follow development on qmailtoaster
for awhile but i just recently installed
qmail
hey guys, i haven't been able to follow development on qmailtoaster
for awhile but i just recently installed
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.20.i386 and i see policy_check in the logs. i
guess the question is what is this for? is it disabled by default? is
it eMPF? the wiki has instructions for setting it
Could this be the reason?
0.60.4
2008-05-08 Mr. Sam s...@email-scan.com
* Makefile: Drop the unmaintained authvchkpw module.
Maybe we should go to Dovecot sooner than later. I want to but i need
my hands held to do so :)
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:55 PM, slamp
Getting the error below.
06-15 23:43:43 INFO: modules=authvchkpw, daemons=15
06-15 23:43:43 INFO: Installing libauthvchkpw
06-15 23:43:43 INFO: libauthvchkpw.so: cannot open shared object file:
No such file or directory
06-15 23:45:06 INFO: stopping authdaemond children
New package does not
According to the rpm's the file belongs to qmail-toaster.
# rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
the only package i updated was simscan-toaster to the latest 1.4.0
which doesn't know anything about this file (its probably part of the
spec file)
# rpm -ql
It is changed in the simscan spec file. qmail-toaster writes an initial
tcp.smtp file but it does not understand options like NOP0FCHECK=1. Those
options cannot be understood until simscan is installed, since they're in
simscan, not qmail-toaster. Because of that the simscan package rewrites
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
I believe that spamdyke does this, and a lot more, including graylisting.
Are you using spamdyke yet? If so, what's your configuration?
Here is mine (i do not use qtp-plus):
log-target=stderr
log-level=info
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Randy Robbins rrobb...@n2thenet.com wrote:
I found a mail filter in /et/mail that does alot of cool stuff but it
doesnt work as is. I had to add a line to set the VHome varible but there
is some logic that needs to be changed for nonexistant email addresses.
i found this website and i thought i'de share. from what i recall, i
think the author (Lee R. Copp) is a member of this list. hopefully he
will be able to chime in here.
http://mail.michscimfd.com/dspam/
my question iscan this be done globally? i do not want to populate
each users folder
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jake Vickers j...@v2gnu.com wrote:
Happy New Year!
We released a new version of QControl (and QControlPE) which now has some
new features. You can now view log files and search for specific terms in
the logs, as well as edit certain config files (such as
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Dairenn Lombard
dlomb...@broadspire.com wrote:
Uh, huh?
Maybe if you're dealing with fewer than 100 mailboxes or so, then, sure.
But SpamAssassin has to be about the poorest performing spam filtering
software I've ever used.
regards,
Dairenn Lombard
Unix
i use it to filter messages from mailing lists to their own folders.
its a pain when using different mua's and have to define filters for
each of them.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone doing anything with maildrop besides what is already included
it seems pretty good. just wanted to see if anyone is using it.
http://atmail.org/
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe,
you must be using some elite rules! i got it, i only use the openprotect rules.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anil Aliyan wrote:
Wonderful qmailtoaster mailing list itself recieves spam mail. mail
attached below i recieved yesterday.
- Original
i know i know someone will say search the archivesi did and i have
actually tweaked my spamd run and config file as well as clamd.conf. i
am using spamdyke 4.0.2. centos 4.6 on a desktop with AMD Athlon(TM)
XP1500+ and 768 MB. it handles email for only 1 domain with very very
little traffic.
:
attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93.3
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first reply on this thread came back to me twice! This is great. No need
to wait for another dupe to show up.
Dairenn Lombard wrote:
-Original Message-
From: slamp slamp [mailto
Anyone know why this is happening?
stopping and starting qmail did not fix it. reboot did.
07-10 20:21:06 status: local 3/10 remote 0/60
07-10 20:21:07 delivery 25: deferral: Aack,_child_crashed._(#4.3.0)/
07-10 20:21:07 status: local 2/10 remote 0/60
07-10 20:21:07 delivery 28: failure:
if you have a customized /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file, make sure you
make a backup of it. It wiped it out on mine on simscan re-install
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
Jake, Eric, et al: Any thoughts about what I should attempt
what about a spec file? :-)
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I agree with everything Sam says here.
(Not that it matters much ;) )
Sam Clippinger wrote:
spamdyke has no flaws, I thought everyone knew that. :) Perhaps I
I thought that SPF checked MAIL FROM?
The email has this:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So shouldn't SPF be checking mydomain.com ?
However below is what it checked:
Received-SPF: none (mail.mydomain.com: domain at
jrasup.freeserve.co.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts)
This domain is
follow entirely, but I'll try to explain.
slamp slamp wrote:
I thought that SPF checked MAIL FROM?
The from on the 'envelope', not the from on the inside.
The email has this:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the inside. That one doesn't matter.
So shouldn't SPF be checking
with all the e-mails going on about spamassassin, has anyone used this
at all and have success with it?
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_Rule2XSBody.html
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR
is there a reason why one would enable RBL checking in spamassassin?
isn't this done already and wouldn't it be redundant?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Eric Shubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I figured out the problem. This problem explains several things,
including why it was
succesful build on CentOS 4.6. i don't use the newmodel scripts.
3d0936eeccebc3476910330d60a42b93 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13.src.rpm
rpm-build-4.3.3-23_nonptl
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is interesting - same as ES's...
But I am
i also found somewhere that adding a the below TXT entry into your DNS
helps with hotmail issues. try it out and let me know if it works. it
works for me at least.
IN TXT spf2.0/pra
On Feb 12, 2008 12:41 AM, senthil vel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is SPL?. We have set up sender
hi everyone, is there a way to better improve logging of catchall
deleted e-mails? in the log it shows that it has been delivered which
should say that it was deleted because it doesn't exist. also if it is
going to delete the e-mail anyway why does it have to go through
simscan? can it be delete
It seems that my mail server was attacked yesterday. I have already
blacklisted the IP. My question is, how can I prevent this from
happening? I do not need smtp access to my server remotely and i do
not have remote users. All e-mail transactions are done through
webmail and/or in my internal
force efforts at local login accounts
via the use of BlockHosts:
http://www.aczoom.com/cms/blockhosts
Maybe there's something similar, or an extension for it, to include
vpopmail slamming?
Harry
On Dec 28, 2007, at 9:42 PM, slamp slamp wrote:
It seems that my mail server was attacked
they mentioned that both 1.4.11 and 1.4.12 were compromised. there
should be a changelog file in the squirrelmail directory that tells
you what version you are running.
On Dec 18, 2007 1:26 PM, Jim Shupert, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might you tell me how I can determine what version of qmt
ANNOUNCE: SquirrelMail 1.4.13 Released
Dec 14, 2007 by Jonathan Angliss
Due to the package compromise of 1.4.11, and 1.4.12, we are forced
to release 1.4.13 to ensure no confusions. While initial review didn't
uncover a need for concern, several proof of concepts show that the
package
have you guys seen this? http://www.mailradar.com/mailstat/
i thought qmail was 2nd?
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To
I received the mailer-daemon below but the original message was not
sent by me. i have spf set and the server that sent me the
mailer-daemon failed the SPF check but still allowed for the mail to
go through.
Received-SPF: fail (mail300.opentransfer.com: SPF record at domain.com
does not designate
this means no more building on your own. you no longer need build
tools installed on your mail server (those of us with no dev server).
you only need to yum intall the qmail packages and yum update when new
packages are in!
On Nov 30, 2007 8:57 AM, Warren Melnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What
On Nov 26, 2007 2:33 PM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that the account administration plugin is
missing from Squirrelmail?
I have 2 servers this is evident on, 1 QMT-ISO machine and one
manually installed machine, both running
when this is installed, does it make any changes to the current
system? i am currently using the older backup/restore scripts. btw, i
havent seen any emails from eric shubes, is he still around?
On Nov 25, 2007 1:52 PM, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fresh out of the oven is
spamassassin is fine on my server but then again i only use the stock
spamassassin and openprotect rules.
On Nov 12, 2007 7:08 AM, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not having problem with SA
but with clamav, I get soft-reject everytime I restart my server (it's a
Pentium III with memory
you need something like this:
192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1,NOP0FCHECK=1
On Nov 6, 2007 8:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So really, it's looking like I need to create DNS records for all of the
internal machines also then? For internal use only?
thanks everyone for the clarification.
On 10/2/07, Janno Sannik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
port 25 doesn't require but accepts authentication.
That means if youre not in tcprules then you need to auth. If you are ,
you don't need to auth and can relay as you just asked.
slamp slamp wrote
quick question, does the standard port 25 in qmailtoaster
support/requires authentication? i know port 587 requires
authentication.
so if i add my local network in tcp.smtp, i should be able to relay
without authentication?
like so:
you will have to do this yourself manually. best way is to boot the
server into a CD. setup the new disk, mount to a temp dir and copy all
files from /home to the temp dir. (cp -a should do it, i like to use
rsync -avv).
On 10/1/07, Ariel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List, I need, to put a disc but
If you are using a current qmailtoaster, this should be automatic. but
if you are using an old qmailtoaster, mailfilter was broken and i had
to put this in my .mailfilter file.
cat /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/user/.mailfilter
if (/^Subject:.*(SPAM)/ )
{
exception {
to
well if you are concerned about time and want to update it every
minute why not just run the ntp daemon? thats how i have mine setup.
On 8/26/07, Basura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you are right. * * * * * is every minute. In fact, if I change the
command to echo x /txt it writes a new line every
are you using the latest qmailtoaster? i don't remember when but
submission port 587 was only added on the later versions of
qmailtoaster.
check if you have anything running on port 587.
$ netstat -tapn | grep 587
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:587 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN -
i created a ticket on Tuesday, 17 July 2007, 17:10 GMT-7 related to this.
On 8/3/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm gonna open a ticket in the bug tracker so that 1.4 branch includes
a maildrop logrotate script.
Erik
On 8/3/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik A.
this is one good reason to use gnu screen.
On 8/2/07, Erik Grammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jake. I was expecting the script to continue running on the server
even though my session was killed but I started qtp-newmodel again and it
picked up just prior to building the sandbox. Thanks
i just installed this also and it fixed the issue i was having with
connect() failure.
On 7/17/07, Phil Leinhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just read what I typed before... I meant to say Is that the fix to the CPU
hogging we discussed a few weeks ago. You figured it out though.
I'll have
just wondering when we'll get an srpm for this new clamav.
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.90.2 Recommended version: 0.91
i am hoping this will fix the connect(): No such file or directory i
have whenever qmail or the actual server is restarted.
if you had to edit spec files just to run on your system, then your
system is not supported. you come over here asking for questions like
we should fix your problem. you should not be bashing someone just
because they said to use a compatible os.
and actually, mail::domainkeys was part of the
what version of clamav are you using? there has been an issue with
clamav delay in startup.
also are all the services running?
post output of:
qmailctl stat
On 6/26/07, dnk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had found (thus far) no other references to issues other that the
originally posted excerpt
i get the delay too. Erik said to recompile simscan but that didn't
seem to work.
On 6/21/07, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't recognize this problem. The only thig I saw was the log delay at
start-up.
Johannes
Phil Leinhauser schrieb:
Hi Johannes,
I'm
the issue i am having is that the communication between simscan and
clamd is not immediate. i have to wait at least two minutes for mail
to start coming in.
connect(): No such file or directory
by the way, spamassassin 3.2.1 and 3.1.9 are out. when can we see them
for the current toaster?
On
it is part of the qmailtoaster-plus. if you have that installed and
configured then you need to disable it. otherwise don't do anything.
On 6/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Rules du Jour something that is 'on' by default with Qmail toaster or
is it an option you enable
, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how did you manage to update? my toaster broke after upgrading to
the
new clamav 0.90.3.
2007-06-03 21:59:51.388989500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
2007-06-03 22:04:27.781227500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
2007-06-03 22:06:14.848932500 tcpserver: status: 1
how did you manage to update? my toaster broke after upgrading to the
new clamav 0.90.3.
2007-06-03 21:59:51.388989500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
2007-06-03 22:04:27.781227500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
2007-06-03 22:06:14.848932500 tcpserver: status: 1/100
2007-06-03 22:06:14.848938500 tcpserver:
imap4-ssl/log: up (pid 2940) 442 seconds
pop3/log: up (pid 2933) 442 seconds
pop3-ssl/log: up (pid 2936) 442 seconds
send/log: up (pid 2928) 442 seconds
smtp/log: up (pid 2930) 442 seconds
spamd/log: up (pid 2925) 442 seconds
submission/log: up (pid 2923) 442 seconds
On 6/3/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL
i don't understand how this option is not default since the mailfilter
script has been fixed by mark samples if i remember correctly.
On 5/28/07, Glenn Remstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 12:55 -0400, Jake Vickers wrote:
Glenn Remstedt wrote:
hello list,
I've just try
it is not set as default. just rebuild qmailadmin manually and add
--define 'spambox 1' . i dont use qtp so i dont know how it works with
that.
On 5/28/07, Glenn Remstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if that should be set as default, how to determine that?
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 14:29 -0400, slamp
thanks that makes alot of sense.
On 5/23/07, davide bozzelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slamp slamp ha scritto:
I saw that an extra module has been added to the v310.pre config. Does
this replace the buggy qmail-dk?
The qmail-dk works at mta-level, meaning BEFORE simscan call spamc
I saw that an extra module has been added to the v310.pre config. Does
this replace the buggy qmail-dk?
###
# experimental plugins
# DomainKeys - perform DomainKeys verification
#
# External modules required for use, see
thanks fuzzy, i will do an upgrade and update here if all goes well.
On 5/18/07, fuzzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 3:44 pm, slamp slamp wrote:
CentOS 4.5 just came out, I'm not sure if anyone has upgraded their
4.4 boxes yet but if you did please do tell if it went smoothly
there is a bug report on this.
http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/?do=detailstask_id=10
On 5/19/07, PakOgah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
talking about submission port, I am notice there is no qmailmrtg for
submission port. submission port is just the same with smtp right? but
without rblsmtpd
upgrade went smoothly and toaster is still working as it was.
On 5/19/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks fuzzy, i will do an upgrade and update here if all goes well.
On 5/18/07, fuzzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 3:44 pm, slamp slamp wrote:
CentOS 4.5 just
CentOS 4.5 just came out, I'm not sure if anyone has upgraded their
4.4 boxes yet but if you did please do tell if it went smoothly and if
toaster is affected or not
Thanks.
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
:
:mail.optonline.net
what would I need to add?
would this work?
:mail.optonline.net
mydomain.com:internal ip
with this setup does qmail know to use my ISP for outgoing and
mydomain.com for relay?
thanks.
On 5/3/07, Davide Bozzelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
slamp slamp wrote
Would this work with the qmailtoaster setup?
URL: http://rauros.net/projects/qmail/smtproute.php
Guide: Configuring qmail to remotely clean e-mail
Lets say you have four domains: localemail.tld, computers.tld,
websites.tld, and servers.tld. You want to let them handle their own
mail, but you
domainkeys is broken in QMT install. The latest version of QMT disables this
by default. The recommended action is to disable domainkeys altogether.
search the archives for the procedure.
On 4/25/07, Warren (mailing lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a lot of messages bounced from
i just installed this on my server and it seems to be functioning fine. dont
see any errors.
On 4/23/07, Johannes Weberhofer, Weberhofer GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I will start testing the latest clamav devel packages for clamav tomorrow,
because it seems to be impotant to use it as you can
Looking at this wiki. It says I can use the same SSL certificate for apache.
How would this work when my qmail is mail.domain.com and my apache is
www.domain.com? Isn't the cert tied to a common name? Unless if using a
wildcard which I don't think is a feature of that $9.99 certificate.
send your self an e-mail from an external account, check the headers and you
should see something like this:
*Received-SPF:* none (mail.mydomain.com: domain at optonline.net does not
designate permitted sender hosts)
And you can also test from sites like
This might be what you are looking for SENDER_NOCHECK=1 ...
I have it setup like so in my tcp.smtp file.
192.168.1.5:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,SENDER_NOCHECK=1
On 3/12/07, Brian Trudeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously I had it setup so email for a specific domain which has no
real MX record
the only problem with your statement is that i do not send any messages from
my domain to the toaster list. ive subscribed it to the toaster list so i
can get a constant e-mail flow.
On 3/6/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slamp slamp wrote:
Can anyone tell me why this is so?
Return
Can anyone tell me why this is so?
Return-Path:
Received: (qmail 4571 invoked for bounce); 22 Feb 2007 13:56:12 -
Date: 22 Feb 2007 13:56:12 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns1.qmailtoaster.com.
I'm afraid I
try the clamd package in the devel site. i think this was resolved in that
update.
On 3/5/07, Francisco Paco Peralta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem I hope I can get some guidance on.
I did an update (using qtp-menu) this weekend and everything seemed to
have gone right. This
On 2/26/07, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
I'm no expert with this, but I would think that the following rule
should
have assigned a negative value:
* 4.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
In spamassassin-toaster-3.1.7-1.3.6, I see the rule for AWL
I have clamav-toaster-0.90-1.3.10 with no problems either. this was an
upgrade from the rc. but i do see duplicates in my log. the oldest i have
for logs are from 2/14. i am curious as to why the logs are duplicated.
On 2/26/07, Philip Nix Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
The new spamassassin seems to be very sensitive. My test e-mail was flagged
spam for this new version when it wasn't flagged for the old one. I only
have the default installed, no extra sarules.
message was sent from optonline webmail with subject hello and body check
the header.
Here is the
anyone using openDNS for their caching dns (bind or djbdns). if so what are
your thoughts?
don't they all use the same kernel drivers? if your machine is new, fedora6
should be able to handle it, or compile your own kernel from vanilla.
On 2/10/07, Erik A. Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabriel,
There is no support for Debian based distributions.
Good Luck,
Erik
On 2/9/07,
It would lessen the number of login/logout in your imap4 (or imap4-ssl) log.
I get really long logwatch e-mail because of the number of login/logout that
SM does.
On 2/8/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really. When all connections are localhost, it doesn't really help.
It does
Thanks Erik, imapproxy is nice!!
Eric,
This would be a good addon to qtp.
On 2/7/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Slamp
Eric,
I have done this once, SM on a different host from QT. That was REALLY
SLOW
even on a 100mbps connection. So I just decided to implement proxy in
Is there a reason why the default config of squirrelmail is not using the
submission port? Is it really necessary for squirrelmail to be checked
against RBL's? I found that squirrelmail is much faster (sending) when
configured to use the submission port since it bypasses RBL checks. This
also
Hi list,
I have different linux servers that are internal only but would like to use
toaster as the relay. Basically I do not want any mail residing on the local
linux servers.
So far I've allowed the IP of my linux servers in tcp.smtp (same as 127
line) and able to relay to the toaster ONLY if
Just a heads up I guess. I haven't yet upgraded to the
courier-authlib-toaster-0.59
http://www.qmailtoaster.com/download/stable/courier-authlib-toaster-0.59-1.3.4.src.rpm
thinking this package will get updated soon enough.
0.59.1
2007-01-16 Mr. Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* authldaplib.c
On 1/22/07, Kisakye Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Everyone!
Today my toaster has been returning the following error when trying to
send mail from the squirrel web client! I have not made changes to the
compose file at all!
Squirrel returns the error :: Server replied: 354 and the error
So basically no one should be using catch-all mailboxes?
On 1/21/07, Alexey Loukianov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George Sweetnam wrote:
You shouldn't set the catchall to bounce though... select delete. The
dictionary attacks will harvest the valid users if you select bounce!
Agreed.
How did you get domainkeys working in this setup?? When I set my domainkeys
awhile ago, gmail or yahoo always said bad keys. and I was told here on the
list that it wont work because the headers are changed/updated by the smtp
server in smtproute.
On 1/16/07, Vince Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am flooded with these messages. does it mean my server is open for relay?
should i be worried?
tcpserver: ok 32516 mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32413
user invalid null
tcpserver: ok 32518 mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32414
user invalid null
user invalid null
?
slamp slamp wrote:
I am flooded with these messages. does it mean my server is open for
relay? should i be worried?
tcpserver: ok 32516 mail.mydomain.com:192
http://mail.mydomain.com:192.168.1.2:25 :75.5.19.70::32413
user invalid null
tcpserver: ok 32518 mail.mydomain.com:192
http
I meant safe*
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its same to assume that clamav 0.90rc2 is stable?
On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a bunch. Those are great enhancements!
Erik Espinoza wrote:
Done.
On 1/10/07, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL
Since there is now a new maildrop package which i assume has the mailfilter
spam support, should the qmailadmin be modified so it defaults with --define
'spambox 1'?
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant safe*
On 1/10/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its
is it just me or this rpm is borked?
when i login it's stuck on webmail/src/redirect.php
[client 192.168.1.50] PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function:
getpref() in /usr/share/squirrelmail/src/redirect.php on line 127, referer:
https://www.MYDOMAIN.com/webmail/src/login.php
using centos
i guess it was just me. restarted apache and it worked, don't know why i
needed to do that though.
On 1/8/07, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it just me or this rpm is borked?
when i login it's stuck on webmail/src/redirect.php
[client 192.168.1.50] PHP Fatal error: Call
here is the maildrop log dir. see if creating the dir with the correct
permission/ownership will fix your issue.
# ls -ld /var/log/maildrop/
drwxr-xr-x 2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Oct 28 21:34 /var/log/maildrop/
# ls -l /var/log/maildrop/
total 1128
-rw--- 1 vpopmail vchkpw 1148395 Nov 25
i had an issue where spam version did not update, maybe you can resolve your
issue with this.
stop qmail, then do a ps for any spamd/spamc/perl processes and kill them
rebuild spamassassin
rebuild cdb
start qmail.
On 11/22/06, Hainarosie Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did that ...still not
Can usendmail be included in qtp? I think this would be good for sendmail converts.http://www.ohse.de/uwe/usendmail.html
hey list, i disabled all filters for my secondary mx (i needed to do this for my setup as my account would get disabled if i reject a spam and send it back their way) and now spams are going through without it being tagged spam and moved to spam folder. how would i manually scan e-mails and tag
forgot to change gateway in the linux box. lol.On 11/9/06, tearsong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of newbie curiosity, what was wrong with it?~GN(aka geeknoob)On 10/29/06, slamp slamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:false alarm. problem resolved.
On 10/29/06, slamp slamp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello
Can this be implemented in a toaster setup?http://howtoforge.com/antispam_smtp_proxyTell assp to listen to
123.123.123.123:25 and forward to localhost:25.
Network Setup SMTP Destination 127.0.0.1:25 The internal Postfix V As a Daemon Check the box
Listen Port 123.123.123.123:25 The spam proxy
hmm actually if spam hits is over 12 points it generates a bounce.
bounce message:
rejected by: bounced (host domain.com[69.115.xx.xxx] said: 554 Your
email is considered spam (17.50 spam-hits) (in reply to end of DATA
command))
smtp log:
2006-10-24 16:56:47.566033500 tcpserver: status: 0/100
= OFF
Would this be what I need to drop messages with spam hits over 12???
On 11/7/06, slamp slamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm actually if spam hits is over 12 points it generates a bounce.
bounce message:
rejected by: bounced (host domain.com[69.115.xx.xxx] said: 554 Your
email is considered
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
