Lee R. Copp wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming from
the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam
handle this?
Forwarding the message to a spam/ham training address will distort the
message but dspam
Eric Shubes wrote:
Is that one qmail-alias per server, domain, or user? (I'm not real clear on
the process yet)
Its per user but it might be possible to have a global address if dspam
was tweaked. It might support it now but I'm not sure...my dspam
version is over a year old.
Do I understand
Rangi Biddle wrote:
With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way.
POP3 would work fine except for the training portion of dspam.
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
Lee R. Copp wrote:
Rangi Biddle wrote:
With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam
Lee R. Copp wrote:
Rangi Biddle wrote:
With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way.
POP3 would work fine except for the
Justice London wrote:
Well, apparently I lied. I'm not going to have time this week to work on the
dspam stuff.
Justice London
That's ok, Justice. There's no hurry. Slow and steady wins the race! If we
get anything going at all on this by the end of the year, I'll be happy. ;)
--
-Eric
Well, apparently I lied. I'm not going to have time this week to work on the
dspam stuff.
Justice London
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:38 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubes wrote:
Lee R. Copp wrote:
Rangi Biddle wrote:
With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam
Eric Shubes wrote:
I was wondering about dspam w/ pop3. This answers a lot of questions.
I'm disappointed to see that Netscape doesn't have a redirect option.
However, there *is* a mailredirect extension for Mozilla Thunderbird (0.7
and above) and Mozilla Mail. I don't know if this would work
Eric Shubes wrote:
Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming from
the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam
handle this?
Forwarding the message to a spam/ham training address will distort the
message but dspam won't care. When
Firdaus Tjahyadi wrote:
On 10/27/06, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Great.
I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get
going on
this. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box?
I'd also like
Eric Shubes wrote:
I suppose that answers anyother question, which AV? I'm think that we'll
want to change as little as possible of the toaster configuration. Why
Vexira instead of ClamAV (which is plugged into simscan)?
I setup Vexira before ClamAV got added to the toaster.
Also, is there
Eric Shubes wrote:
the administration CGI scripts (if you intend to run the CGI scripts). This
was wholly an apache suexec issue more than a DSpam one.
Hey Lee, what do you know about this problem? (Please see Rangi's earlier
post) Did you come across this problem? Solution?
I ignored the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW Vexira? with which conf, 2 qmails and vams between them ?
Internet Vexira Qmail
God save simscan :-P
I will have to check that out.
--
Lee R. Copp
Project Engineer (EE/ME)
http://www.michsci.com/
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 31 October 2006 10:53 a.m.
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster
Eric Shubes wrote:
the administration CGI scripts (if you intend to run the CGI scripts).
This
was wholly an apache suexec issue more than
On 10/27/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great.I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get going onthis. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box?I'd also like to see 1 or 2 other volunteers.Before we jump right in, I'm thinking that we need to figure
, but I belief in improving where
possible.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 October 2006 21:49
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
Thanks Marco. We're (obviously) a long way from testing
Lee R. Copp wrote:
Did anyone check out my dspam toaster page?
http://mail.michscimfd.com/dspam/
Its a bit dated but might provide some help...;)
This is a fantastic start for us, Lee. I haven't gotten around to googling
background for this project, but your site is a gold mine!
A few
Justice,
I hope you've checked out Lee's site.
Justice London wrote:
I'll try to work on implementation today and hopefully have some sort of
working test within the next week or two. I'll keep you guys informed.
Justice London
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
spamassassin.
I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change?
I think a nice approach about this will be options.
You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
spamassassin.
I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change?
I think a nice approach about this will be options.
You can use
, October 26, 2006 10:41 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
spamassassin.
I don't know how dspam works
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:41 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
spamassassin.
I
Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:59 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
Great.
I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get going on
this. Can we use CentOS4.4
Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
spamassassin.
I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change?
I think a nice approach about this will be options.
You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?)
AFAIK. This is the same
On Oct 25, 2006, at 3:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P
I'm not keen on DSPAM, as it appears to require too much work.
I'm a big fan of TMDA. (tmda.net)
whitelisting, that works.
---
Antoine De Saint-Exupery
True happiness
26 matches
Mail list logo
