Having trouble from some places getting email to my server, they get tls
errors?
lnt.c:567:
Jan 9 14:56:15 cp sendmail[32112]: ruleset=tls_server, arg1=SOFTWARE,
relay=mx1.host2max.com, reject=403 4.7.0 TLS handshake failed
Any ideas?
-
Sam Clippinger ha scritto:
OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can reproduce
your error. It may be a little while before I have the time, however.
In the meantime, can you try enabling TLS support in spamdyke to see
if this error persists? Inside spamdyke, TLS passthroug
-rdns
I also tried recompiling with --disable-tls parameter, still had problems?
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Ronnie Tartar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 2:55 PM
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Having trouble from som
o: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
> Having trouble from some places getting email to my server, they get tls
> errors?
>
> lnt.c:567:
> Jan 9 14:56:15 cp sendmail[32112]: ruleset=tls_server, arg1=SOFTWARE,
> relay=mx1.host2max.com,
Most likely, spamdyke doesn't have permission to read your TLS
certificate. Are you seeing any errors in the maillog on your qmail server?
You can also try running spamdyke with the "--config-test" flag to check
for configuration errors.
-- Sam Clippinger
Ronnie Tartar wrote:
Having trouble
Strange, those errors are on other machines. Not on the qmail toaster
machine.
I ran the configtest, no errors.
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with
e.
I ran the configtest, no errors.
- Original Message - From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Most likely, spamdyke doesn't have permission to read your TLS
ote:
> > Strange, those errors are on other machines. Not on the qmail toaster
> > machine.
> >
> > I ran the configtest, no errors.
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message ----- From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > T
9 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Well Ronnie, you just can't get any better service than the author
himself!!
Looks like you're in good hands.
Phil
-Original message-
From: Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:43:29 -0500
To: qmailtoa
Additionally, I was not able to get any emails from the qmail toaster list
either.
- Original Message -
From: "Ronnie Tartar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Yes,
Spamdy
er
use settings for spamassassin.
- Original Message - From: "Phil Leinhauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Well Ronnie, you just can't get any better service than the author
hi
I will give this a shot tonight then send update.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup
, January 09, 2008 5:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
OK, I should be able to duplicate that setup to see if I can reproduce
your error. It may be a little while before I have the time, however.
In the meantime, can you try enabling
BTW, this is a great program, thanks it is really keeping the spammers @
bay
-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 5:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
OK, I
conf file.
Just will not work without it.
Thanks for the fix.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Clippinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 5:00 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
OK, I should
.3
> courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7
> maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.5
> simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6
>
> Are the packages, bone stock except for spambox being enabled and per
> use settings for spamassassin.
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Phil Lein
Actually, enabling TLS in spamdyke is the best solution. When spamdyke
handles the TLS, the remote server can't tell the difference -- if it
was using TLS before, it should continue to do so. However, because
spamdyke decrypts the traffic, it can enable all of its filters
(including graylisti
Sam, et. al.
I would say that to get the best results out of SPAMDYKE, you DEFINITELY
want *IT* to handle the TLS. My reasoning is 2-fold:
1) I have an average of 15% of incoming SPAM that is attaching with TLS
(I thought this was odd, but apparently not)
2) I require TLS for my outbound mail (
I agree spamdyke should handle the TLS so all of its filters can be used
(including graylisting).
However, spamdyke can't filter outbound mail. Anything that's generated
on your server (e.g. webmail users) will bypass spamdyke entirely.
Anything that's sent through your server (e.g. your user
Dan,
Did you get your backup server problem worked out? If so, what did you find?
Phil
-Original message-
From: Dan McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:11:03 -0500
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
> Sam,
ppinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:03 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
I agree spamdyke should handle the TLS so all of its filters can be used
(including graylisting).
However, spamdyke can't
dnesday, January 09, 2008 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Problems with SPAMDYKE
Well Ronnie, you just can't get any better service than the author
himself!!
Looks like you're in good hands.
Phil
-Original message-
From: Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: We
22 matches
Mail list logo
