The reason I ask is I have successfully been running mine that way for
some time now. I also run a webserver on the same system.
Fingers crossed, now that I said that.
On 03/02/2011 01:35 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> Security and managability.
>
> In addition, QMT is a heavy DNS user, so it's best
Security and managability.
In addition, QMT is a heavy DNS user, so it's best to run a caching
resolver on the QMT host. It's also a good idea make your authoritative
DNS server (if you run one yourself) separate from your resolver. Hence,
if you have a caching resolver on your QMT, your autho
I am curious why you say it's not a good idea to run a QMT server and a
NS on the same machine?
CJ
On 03/02/2011 12:40 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 01:21 PM, Sergio M wrote:
>> I can say that with 64 concurrencyincoming and 16 spamd childs (and a
>> magic reboot, just in case)
>> its
On 03/02/2011 01:21 PM, Sergio M wrote:
I can say that with 64 concurrencyincoming and 16 spamd childs (and a
magic reboot, just in case)
its now flowing smoothly and the sessions are under 40/64 most of the
time. (for now)
# top
top - 17:19:24 up 43 min, 1 user, load average: 0.55, 0.73, 0.95
Ta
On 03/02/2011 01:21 PM, Sergio M wrote:
I can say that with 64 concurrencyincoming and 16 spamd childs (and a
magic reboot, just in case)
its now flowing smoothly and the sessions are under 40/64 most of the
time. (for now)
# top
top - 17:19:24 up 43 min, 1 user, load average: 0.55, 0.73, 0.95
Ta
I can say that with 64 concurrencyincoming and 16 spamd childs (and a
magic reboot, just in case)
its now flowing smoothly and the sessions are under 40/64 most of the
time. (for now)
# top
top - 17:19:24 up 43 min, 1 user, load average: 0.55, 0.73, 0.95
Tasks: 269 total, 1 running, 268 slee
On 03/02/2011 12:55 PM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 12:32 PM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 12:04 PM, Sergio M wrote:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/spamd -x -m 8 -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1
That's a good start.
What are your load number looking li
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 12:32 PM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 12:04 PM, Sergio M wrote:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/spamd -x -m 8 -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1
That's a good start.
What are your load number looking like? Pretty low I expect.
I'd open that p
On 03/02/2011 12:32 PM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 12:04 PM, Sergio M wrote:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/spamd -x -m 8 -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1
That's a good start.
What are your load number looking like? Pretty low I expect.
I'd open that puppy up. You can handle
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 12:04 PM, Sergio M wrote:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/spamd -x -m 8 -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1
That's a good start.
What are your load number looking like? Pretty low I expect.
I'd open that puppy up. You can handle way more than 25 connections.
I'd go bac
On 03/02/2011 12:04 PM, Sergio M wrote:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/spamd -x -m 8 -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1
That's a good start.
What are your load number looking like? Pretty low I expect.
I'd open that puppy up. You can handle way more than 25 connections.
I'd go back to the default value o
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/bin/spamd -x -m 8 -u vpopmail -s stderr 2>&1
That's a good start.
What are your load number looking like? Pretty low I expect.
I'd open that puppy up. You can handle way more than 25 connections.
I'd go back to the default value of 100 for starters, and double the
numbe
On 03/02/2011 11:16 AM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 10:22 AM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
You should see:
03-02 10:09:37 tcpserver: status: 0/25
right after you start qmail. If it doesn't drop to 0 when you start
it, then something's wrong. Please check the
Good guess Finn, but they appear to be coming from a wide variety of
addresses.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 03/02/2011 11:15 AM, Finn Buhelt (kirstineslund) wrote:
Hi Sergio.
Sounds like You're having a script that sends mail !
Do You by any chance have a webserver with e-mail forms that can have
be
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 10:22 AM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
You should see:
03-02 10:09:37 tcpserver: status: 0/25
right after you start qmail. If it doesn't drop to 0 when you start
it, then something's wrong. Please check the status message which
corresponds to the
Hi Sergio.
Sounds like You're having a script that sends mail !
Do You by any chance have a webserver with e-mail forms that can have
been compromised ?
Regards,
Finn
On 02-03-2011 18:22, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
You should see:
03-02 10:09:37 tcpserver: status: 0/25
right a
On 03/02/2011 10:22 AM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
You should see:
03-02 10:09:37 tcpserver: status: 0/25
right after you start qmail. If it doesn't drop to 0 when you start
it, then something's wrong. Please check the status message which
corresponds to the start of qmail. If it's
For simple exercise I would run queue repair.
On 03/02/2011 09:22 AM, Sergio M wrote:
> Eric Shubert escribió:
>>
>> You should see:
>> 03-02 10:09:37 tcpserver: status: 0/25
>> right after you start qmail. If it doesn't drop to 0 when you start
>> it, then something's wrong. Please check the stat
Eric Shubert escribió:
You should see:
03-02 10:09:37 tcpserver: status: 0/25
right after you start qmail. If it doesn't drop to 0 when you start
it, then something's wrong. Please check the status message which
corresponds to the start of qmail. If it's not 0/25, please post
several lines be
On 03/02/2011 09:44 AM, Sergio M wrote:
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 06:31 AM, Sergio M wrote:
[from this other thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg30514.html
]
As I said, being under SMTP attack I installed fail2ban and created a
set of rules like
Eric Shubert escribió:
On 03/02/2011 06:31 AM, Sergio M wrote:
[from this other thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg30514.html
]
As I said, being under SMTP attack I installed fail2ban and created a
set of rules like:
*** jail.conf ***
(...)
[vpopmail]
e
On 03/02/2011 06:31 AM, Sergio M wrote:
[from this other thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg30514.html
]
As I said, being under SMTP attack I installed fail2ban and created a
set of rules like:
*** jail.conf ***
(...)
[vpopmail]
enabled = true
port = pop3 f
Sergio M escribió:
[from this other thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg30514.html
]
As I said, being under SMTP attack I installed fail2ban and created a
set of rules like:
*** jail.conf ***
(...)
[vpopmail]
enabled = true
port = pop3 filter = vpopmail
23 matches
Mail list logo
