On 05/03/2011 09:07 AM, Dan McAllister wrote:
Greetings QMail list...
I am in the unenviable position of admitting that some of my QMail is FM
to me (FM is f***ing magic or, in plainer terms I know it works,
I just don't know how) -- and that has me in a bit of a quandary
I host web
to get.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 9:32 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option
On 05/03/2011 09:07 AM, Dan McAllister wrote:
Greetings QMail list...
I am
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
that. Spamdyke false positives are practically nonexistent though, so you
might want to just leave spamdyke active and not tell him about it. Then
again, if he insists on receiving spam, I'd charge him extra for the load
: Peter Peltonen [mailto:peter.pelto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:38 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
that. Spamdyke false positives
to have to resolve the issue...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Peter Peltonen [mailto:peter.pelto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 10:38 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric
On 05/03/2011 10:38 AM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote:
that. Spamdyke false positives are practically nonexistent though, so you
might want to just leave spamdyke active and not tell him about it. Then
again, if he insists on
AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: SPAM Designation Option
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote:
that. Spamdyke false positives are practically nonexistent though, so you
might want to just leave spamdyke active
: SPAM Designation Option
Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote:
that. Spamdyke false positives are practically nonexistent though, so you
might want to just leave spamdyke active and not tell him about it. Then
again, if he insists on receiving spam, I'd charge him
