Jim Shupert wrote:
could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and all
references to b...@billybob.com
here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let us
call them ) bi...@billybob.com
so i wish to see if billy mail hits my server and is
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and
all references to b...@billybob.com
here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let
us call them ) bi...@billybob.com
so i wish to see if billy mail hits my
Jim Shupert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and
all references to b...@billybob.com
here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from ( let
us call them ) bi...@billybob.com
so i wish to see if
On Oct 28, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Jim Shupert wrote:
10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878 sifter.pps-inc.com:
192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074
10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346
these two lines are the key.
the
Is that slash after billybob (# qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp
)supposed to be there or is it a typo?
Jake Vickers wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and
all references to b...@billybob.com
Jake Vickers wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any and
all references to b...@billybob.com
here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from (
let us call them ) bi...@billybob.com
Jim Shupert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any
and all references to b...@billybob.com
here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from (
let us call them )
The argument to the -lc (logs containing) flag is a regular expression,
or regex for short. The period is a special regex character meaning
match any character. The backslash escapes this special meaning so the
period is treated literally as a period and not any character.
It would probably
Steve Huff wrote:
On Oct 28, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Jim Shupert wrote:
10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878
sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074
10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL77346
these two lines are
On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Jim Shupert wrote:
isn't that a diff subnet ? 216.37.105.169 -him , noted offender
216.37.96.0/20
it is not. welcome to CIDR :)
http://www.subnet-calculator.com/cidr.php
enter the offending subnet as listed by Spamhaus (216.37.96.0) in the
IP Address
OK got it.
Eric Shubert wrote:
The argument to the -lc (logs containing) flag is a regular
expression, or regex for short. The period is a special regex
character meaning match any character. The backslash escapes this
special meaning so the period is treated literally as a period and not
Jim Shupert wrote:
Steve Huff wrote:
On Oct 28, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Jim Shupert wrote:
10-26 08:36:39 tcpserver: ok 3878
sifter.pps-inc.com:192.168.200.222:25 :216.37.105.169::33074
10-26 08:36:39 rblsmtpd: 216.37.105.169 pid 3878: 451
OK this one --I do* know
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Is that slash after billybob (# qmlog -lc bi...@billybob\.com smtp
)supposed to be there or is it a typo?
the Slash after ..bob is correct it is an 'escape char' to allow for
the coming Dot
bi...@billybob ESCAPE .com
bi...@billybob\.com
Jake Vickers wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jim Shupert wrote:
could someone remind me how I might look in the logs to see any
and all references to b...@billybob.com
here is my situation a user says she is not getting email from
Jim Shupert wrote:
That will work, yes.
Guess we should launch a group to update/organize the wiki a little.
Any volunteers?
I would enjoy giving back to the community -- i only wonder if i ---
am a good choice [?]
-- elzewize i Volunteer
and Thanks!
Sure you're a good choice! The
Hi Everyone,
Even I would appreciate to become the Volunteer. But I'm new to LINUX, Mail
Server and other stuffs hope that won't affect me to become a Volunteer.
Actually this is my first mailing list where I joined and I'm really feeling
good to join such wonderful mailing list.
Jake, Eric and
16 matches
Mail list logo
