Thanks for everyones reply on this. The issue was actually a corrupt
Windows 8.1 install. This issue manifested itself by causing issues with
a few other applications as well.
Thanks,
Gilbert
On 12/6/2014 11:28 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I would try that first. I appears to met that MS sets up so
I would try that first. I appears to met that MS sets up some things
regarding the server that can't be changed, only established when the
account is being set up. These settings might be in the registry, but
the also might be in the dreaded .pst file. While MS has released specs
for the pst fo
On 08/10/2011 12:04 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
My IP address is 209.209.9.224. I don't want people to directly access
the site by going to http://209.209.9.224 Can I change the behavior so
that it produces an error page or how do I control the default page
that's seen.
Thanks,
CJ
If you're usi
My IP address is 209.209.9.224. I don't want people to directly access
the site by going to http://209.209.9.224 Can I change the behavior so
that it produces an error page or how do I control the default page
that's seen.
Thanks,
CJ
--
Cecil Yother, Jr. "cj"
cj's
2318 Clement Ave
Alameda,
Drupal is a good recommendation. I'm not sure how simple it is though.
I like trac, which is what QTP runs on. There's more to that than just
wiki though.
Mediawiki and wiki come to my mind. Wordpress is also quite popular and
powerful with extensions for CMS in general.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
No contradiction Eric. He mentioned ESXi. I just wanted to point him
toward the ones with an underlying OS not a bare metal instal. The only one
I have dealt with is the VMServer family and GSX. You are probably more
correct with player being a better fit for him, I jus
Behalf Of Eric Shubert
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:10 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT: VMWare question
I hate to contradict Phil, but I think you want VMware Player 3. The
latest version allows you to create VMs (where the previous versions
on
ter.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT: VMWare question
I hate to contradict Phil, but I think you want VMware Player 3. The
latest version allows you to create VMs (where the previous versions
only let you play them). You can use VMware Server ok, but you'd be
restricted to a console win
Xen Server5.5 from Citrix is also available and free ( at least for 12
months )
If you install vmware server , on a linux box , you can also go "
headerless " ie NO GUI.
There are also tons of ready made VM`s for almost any application.
Eric Shubert wrote:
I hate to contradict Phil, but I thi
Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:41 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT: VMWare question
You got me rightly, Eric, but I'm actually talking about my Windows XP
PC at home. I want to VMWare it somehow so that I can 'easily' run
multiple instances of L
2010 3:41 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT: VMWare question
You got me rightly, Eric, but I'm actually talking about my Windows XP
PC at home. I want to VMWare it somehow so that I can 'easily' run
multiple instances of Linux an
You got me rightly, Eric, but I'm actually talking about my Windows XP
PC at home. I want to VMWare it somehow so that I can 'easily' run
multiple instances of Linux and M$ Server for self-study and
certiifcation purposes. The goal is to make myself harder to "lay
off". It looks like VMWorks
Michael Handiboe wrote:
sorry guys, I'll keep this short...
I know that many of you are experienced with VMWare.
I want to get involved, but I want to keep my present hard drive image
-- I like it the way it is.
I'd be happy to make a backup (or drive image) and wipe my drives and
install VM
This is what i like about Spamdyke.. make the change and keep rolling on
with activity.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Peter Peltonen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:49 AM, David Milholen
wrote:
Ok, guys, thanks alot for the quick response.
I have added these lines into my whitelist_rdns and
whitelis
Peter Peltonen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:49 AM, David Milholen wrote:
Ok, guys, thanks alot for the quick response.
I have added these lines into my whitelist_rdns and whitelist_senders. I
will have someone send from that domain tomorrow to be sure all is good.
I need to do this to anoth
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:49 AM, David Milholen wrote:
> Ok, guys, thanks alot for the quick response.
> I have added these lines into my whitelist_rdns and whitelist_senders. I
> will have someone send from that domain tomorrow to be sure all is good.
> I need to do this to another domain with si
Ok, guys, thanks alot for the quick response.
I have added these lines into my whitelist_rdns and whitelist_senders. I
will have someone send from that domain tomorrow to be sure all is good.
I need to do this to another domain with similar issues.
Thanks Much
Dave
Eric Shubert wrote:
Then 208
Then 208-190-224-200.ded.swbell.net is what you'd need in your
whitelist_rdns file. Probably not the best way to whitelist this domain.
To whitelist the domain, add
@cityhs.net
to the whitelist_senders file.
David Milholen wrote:
Eric,
Here is what the log has,
@40004ae256680539da3c spamdy
Eric,
Here is what the log has,
@40004ae256680539da3c spamdyke[14921]: DENIED_RDNS_RESOLVE from:
eda...@cityhs.net to: dmilho...@wletc.com origin_ip: 208.190.224.200
origin_rdns: 208-190-224-200.ded.swbell.net auth: (unknown)
my whitelist_rdns has this
.direclynx.net
.garlandcounty.org
.pc
David Milholen wrote:
Hello All,
I have a single domain that is getting stopped by spamdyke because of
rdns resolve.
The domain is cityhs.net and this is what I have in the whitelist_rdns
file.
Seems the whitelist gets ignored.
This is my spamdyke.conf:
dns-blacklist-entry=2.0.0.127.b.barracu
use shorewall and they have a lot of good
>>> protection and
>>> features. Taking good security practices in the httpd.conf and php.ini
>>> should keep you fairly safe.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com] Sent: Sun
tures. Taking good security practices in the httpd.conf and php.ini
should keep you fairly safe.
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com] Sent: Sunday, September
13, 2009 8:52 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default a
er 13, 2009 8:52 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default apache ?
Thanks guys.
This is a public web server. I just want to deny access to incoming
requests that are directed at the IP and not a specific domain.
Am I correct with my understandi
PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default apache ?
Thanks guys.
This is a public web server. I just want to deny access to incoming
requests that are directed at the IP and not a specific domain.
Am I correct with my understanding of what I read about
this in your directory root, if you want only your internal user
to access it.
-Original Message-
From: Domnick Eger [mailto:de...@cobercafe.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 6:59 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default apache ?
Your best b
Best to put this in your directory root, if you want only your internal user
to access it.
-Original Message-
From: Domnick Eger [mailto:de...@cobercafe.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 6:59 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default apache
Your best bet is to use .htaccess
Deny from All
Allow from 192.168.1.0/24
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 6:14 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default apache ?
This is more an
Is this a public web server? Whatever. Just modify the below advice as follows:
Order Deny,Allow
Deny from 192.168.0.1
Allow from all
However, I feel I must address your motivation. If this is a public
web server, then your firewall is responsible for filtering requests
routing in u
I want all my virtual servers to answer, but not when someone uses
http://192.168.0.1 I want this to show an error page. I read that it
prevents cross scripting and some DNS vulnerabilities.
CJ
Randy Melder wrote:
> I'm not sure I'm getting the intent of the question, but... You could
> just st
I'm not sure I'm getting the intent of the question, but... You could
just stop apache. Or... if you wanna view pages locally, but block
outsiders:
In httpd.conf :
Order Deny,Allow
Deny from all
Allow from 127.0.0.1
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Maxwell Smart wrote:
> This is m
This is more an Apache question, but I know that most everyone on this
list with the exception of me knows the answer.
How do I setup my webserver not to answer to requests to my ip? I have
been reading that this can be very dangerous and mine currently answers
to my default page served up by Apa
Sometimes yum trips over things in its cache. Cleaning everything out
seems to unscramble its brain. ;)
To be honest, I think it's probably a bug, but the clean is an effective
work around. You might consider reporting it to the yum developers at
Duke and see what they have to say about it.
Eric,
I am running the QMT ISO CentOS 5.0. That worked perfectly, all
updated now :)
What exactly was the cause?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Which distro/version?
Have you tried "yum clean all"?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someone on
this li
Which distro/version?
Have you tried "yum clean all"?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someone on this
list can help me.
I am trying to update my toasters and I have updated all of the packages
except one on one server. I cannot get the python to u
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someone on this
list can help me.
I am trying to update my toasters and I have updated all of the packages
except one on one server. I cannot get the python to update. Here is
the error message. I am not really sure what the dealio is.
35 matches
Mail list logo
