Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin's catch-all account break

Also, I changed my catchall account to the postmaster of my domain in qmailadmin and now I'm receiving 'catchall mail' or erroneous mail in this account. I'm not sure what's not working, mines working fine with the latest packages. Any comments? On 7/7/2016 3:26 PM, Eric wrote: Havrla,

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin's catch-all account break

Havrla, What's broken? When I make the various setting changes in qmailadmin ( [ Set catchall email deleted | Set catchall bounced | Set remote catch all account ], and CatchAll Account) it reflects the change in .qmail-default: # cat .qmail-default (Set catchall bounced) |

Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailadmin's catch-all account break

I'll look at it. I don't remember hearing about this. Maybe I just forgot. On 6/28/2016 7:52 AM, Havrla wrote: Helooo Still does not work, something new? Thanks Havrla http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/23 downgrading vpopmail solved qmailadmin's catch-all account break

[qmailtoaster] qmailadmin's catch-all account break

Helooo Still does not work, something new? Thanks Havrla http://notes.sagredo.eu/node/23 downgrading vpopmail solved qmailadmin's catch-all account break Submitted by roberto puzzanghera on Fri, 10/03/2014 - 18:42. Dear all,

Re: [qmailtoaster] to catch all or no

I set Catch-all to delete all emails for the following reasons: 1) There is no need to get catch-all as it does increase spam - anyone can send e-mail(s) to %$£%£%£@whateveryourdomain.com 2) There is no need to bounce back e-mails caught by Catch-all as (a) it increases the traffic for no

[qmailtoaster] to catch all or no

Friends, 1st let me say that i have asked this forum for advice on my battele with spam and I can say that I am enjoying success from the wisdom. thank you. a related matter. I [ the postmaster ] personnally get a lot of spam because I am the ctach all account. this means I get spam for '

Re: [qmailtoaster] to catch all or no

If you must have a catch all, I would go with option 2. With option 1's quota, + or -. --- Sincerely, - Fabian S. On 2014-05-19 09:15, Jim Shupert wrote: Friends, 1st let me say that i have asked this forum for advice on my battele with spam and I can say that I am enjoying success

Re: [qmailtoaster] to catch all or no

Jim, Exactly why do you want/need a catchall account at all? Albeit, while that is far better than having a REJECT rule for badly addressed messages, it also creates an ongoing headache of someone having to scan through tons of messages that you KNOW are most likely SPAM. First, some

Re: [qmailtoaster] to catch all or no

How might one do - have a DELETE rule for badly addressed messages. I just drop them and forget about it? is it as easy as: Set catchall email deletedfrom admin in truth ... i thought you HAD to have a catch all account -- yes - i would rather not. thanks also that strategy of :