RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-14 Thread Michael Colvin
ividual bounces for bad e-mail addresses... Mike -Original Message- From: Tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:to...@interazioni.it] Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 8:51 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER Check on exchange side. Check also if

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-14 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
nt MX resolution issue... Mike -Original Message- From: Tonix (Antonio Nati) [mailto:to...@interazioni.it] Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 7:50 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER Michael, one more element of discussion. If sender has (for

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-14 Thread Michael Colvin
bject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER Michael, one more element of discussion. If sender has (for error) domain with wrong MX in sender address, of course no following rcpt could be accepted, as initial acceptance phase of sender has not successed. This is unique case in which also ser

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-14 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
Michael, one more element of discussion. If sender has (for error) domain with wrong MX in sender address, of course no following rcpt could be accepted, as initial acceptance phase of sender has not successed. This is unique case in which also server's sending is rejected as a whole. Ciao!

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-13 Thread Michael Colvin
> On 11/13/2010 07:16 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > > Il 13/11/2010 15:04, Martin Waschbuesch ha scritto: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I wonder about this one... First of all, I agree with Jake that MX > >> verification is rather important. > >> However, the problem at hand is also a nuisance: Why

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-13 Thread Tonix (Antonio Nati)
y to attempt looking into this... Martin -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- From: Jake Vickers Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 2:10 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER On 11/12/2010 07:15 PM, Michael Colvin wrote: On 11/12/2010 12:38 PM,

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-13 Thread Martin Waschbuesch
I meant chkuser mailing list... I am not completely awake it seems... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- From: Martin Waschbuesch Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 3:04 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER Hi all, I wonder about this one

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-13 Thread Martin Waschbuesch
happy to attempt looking into this... Martin -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- From: Jake Vickers Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 2:10 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER On 11/12/2010 07:15 PM, Michael Colvin wrote: On 11/12/2010 12:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-13 Thread Jake Vickers
On 11/12/2010 07:15 PM, Michael Colvin wrote: On 11/12/2010 12:38 PM, Michael Colvin wrote: OK… So, I’ve got some clients that send mails out to affiliates of theirs via rather large distribution lists. When at least one, maybe more, of those addresses are bad, they get the “Sorry, can’t find

RE: [qmailtoaster] Re: Disable CHKUSER

2010-11-12 Thread Michael Colvin
  > > On 11/12/2010 12:38 PM, Michael Colvin wrote: > > OK… So, I’ve got some clients that send mails out to affiliates of > > theirs via rather large distribution lists. When at least one, maybe > > more, of those addresses are bad, they get the “Sorry, can’t find a > > valid MX for rcpt domain”