Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
Well, I believe we have some good news. Thank you again for your help,
Jake.
With the latest changes (detailed below), the restart of /send wasn't
throwing the errors it was before. So I removed the recordio from the
run file for send, ran Jake's qfixq script again (i
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
Yeah. It was huge. Sorry about that. But I really wasn't sure what to
keep and what to clip. :(
My /var/log/maildrop/maildrop.log was ... gigantinormous. I don't feel
like doing byte math, but I'm pretty sure it was at least close to
2gb. So, I moved that to .log.old-
Well, I believe we have some good news. Thank you again for your
help, Jake.
With the latest changes (detailed below), the restart of /send wasn't
throwing the errors it was before. So I removed the recordio from the
run file for send, ran Jake's qfixq script again (it found several
error
Yeah. It was huge. Sorry about that. But I really wasn't sure what to
keep and what to clip. :(
My /var/log/maildrop/maildrop.log was ... gigantinormous. I don't
feel like doing byte math, but I'm pretty sure it was at least close
to 2gb. So, I moved that to .log.old- and created a new file
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
OK. I put recordio at the start of the command line within the run
file within /var/qmail/supervise/send and started up just the send
service. What follows is the log /var/log/qmail/send/current:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /var/log/qmail/send/current
@40004707b7
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
OK. I tried 'recordio svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/send', but that
clearly doesn't work, as that is just a service script. All I get is
an EOF and a hanging process. What program(s) should I call with
recordio to try to get some meaningful information?
Obviously, I'd p
OK. I tried 'recordio svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/send', but that
clearly doesn't work, as that is just a service script. All I get is
an EOF and a hanging process. What program(s) should I call with
recordio to try to get some meaningful information?
Obviously, I'd prefer to fix this, as i
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
OK. I had queue-repair create a whole new queue, in case it was
something niggling. However, in test mode it hadn't found anything wrong.
Having built a new queue, I have restarted qmail-send, and only send,
to see if it will process through the queue. I assume I shoul
OK. I had queue-repair create a whole new queue, in case it was
something niggling. However, in test mode it hadn't found anything
wrong.
Having built a new queue, I have restarted qmail-send, and only send,
to see if it will process through the queue. I assume I should let it
sit for an
@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender
I've got nearly 50% free space on the disk.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Todd W wrote:
>
> From: "Roxanne Sandesara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote = 60
&
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
OK. Send is still not delivering, clearing up the queue at all.
However, the queue is not re-corrupting itself. I'm not really sure
/what/ to try next. Any suggestions? Should I just leave send running
by itself for a while longer? (I tried forcing the issue with qmHand
OK. Send is still not delivering, clearing up the queue at all.
However, the queue is not re-corrupting itself. I'm not really sure /
what/ to try next. Any suggestions? Should I just leave send running
by itself for a while longer? (I tried forcing the issue with
qmHandle -a to no avail).
Thank you.
I've run the script to repair the queue, and started up just send.
I'm going to leave it to run for an hour or so, to see if it can
manage to make the deliveries it needs to make. If not, I'll shut
down send, check to see if the queue is corrupted again. If it is,
I'll have to
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
Jake, how do I individually stop qmailtoaster services? Will qmailctl
accept a second argument with the name of a service? Or do I need to
'kill' the processes? Is there a way to start up only selected services?
You can stop individual processes with the svc -d comma
Jake, how do I individually stop qmailtoaster services? Will qmailctl
accept a second argument with the name of a service? Or do I need to
'kill' the processes? Is there a way to start up only selected services?
On Oct 6, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Jake Vickers wrote:
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
/va
Roxanne Sandesara wrote:
/var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote = 60
Any idea what 'unable to open todo' means? Or what I should do about it?
/var/log/qmail/send current:
Script started on Fri 05 Oct 2007 04:52:25 PM EDT
]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# qmlog send
10-05 16:52:15 warnin
I've got nearly 50% free space on the disk.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Todd W wrote:
From: "Roxanne Sandesara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote = 60
Any idea what 'unable to open todo' means? Or what I should do
about it?
/var/log/qmail/send current:
Script sta
From: "Roxanne Sandesara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote = 60
Any idea what 'unable to open todo' means? Or what I should do about it?
/var/log/qmail/send current:
Script started on Fri 05 Oct 2007 04:52:25 PM EDT
]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# qmlog se
; -Original Message-
> > From: Roxanne Sandesara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:51 PM
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender
> >
> > qmHandle -M deleted what appeared t
xanne Sandesara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:51 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender
qmHandle -M deleted what appeared to be about 50 messages.
There are still thousands of messages in the local queue. No mail is
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:51 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender
qmHandle -M deleted what appeared to be about 50 messages.
There are still thousands of messages in the local queue. No mail is
being delivered to
: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender
I changed my queue lifetime to one hour (3600)
qmHandle was useful for seeing what is in the queue. But I still
can't get it to /process/ the queue.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Kyle Quillen wrote:
Hell
]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:33 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Queued into surrender
I changed my queue lifetime to one hour (3600)
qmHandle was useful for seeing what is in the queue. But I still
can't get it to /process/ the queue.
On Oct 5, 200
I changed my queue lifetime to one hour (3600)
qmHandle was useful for seeing what is in the queue. But I still
can't get it to /process/ the queue.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Kyle Quillen wrote:
Hello,
I just had this issue the other day.
Have you looked at the tool
qmHandle
If you j
Hello,
I just had this issue the other day.
Have you looked at the tool
qmHandle
If you just type that in it will give you a list of options on how to deal
with the queue.
What do you have your queue lifetime set to?
If you have Qmail toaster plus installed then you have qmHandle.
Thanks
25 matches
Mail list logo