Hello,
We created XSD scheme for qxtransformer XML declaration which brings
autocompletion for any IDE which supports XML autocompletion (as far
as I know almost all).
XSD contains all possible tags and properties with documentation from
APIViewer. But it's just for qxml and it does not support fu
Hello Thomas,
> Peter,
>
> thanks for the patch and the feedback. I also saw that "rubbish" in
> between, when I ran the transformation over a file that contained XML for
> all qooxdoo classes last night.
>
>> After that, aptana liked the file much more!
>
> Again my question: How do you "feed"
>
>
>
> Again my question: How do you "feed" this file to Aptana?!
>
>
Here is a sample of how to add support for a new ajax library in aptana:
http://aptana.com/dev/index.php/Adding_support_for_a_new_Ajax_library
and the main file for code assist has this format:
Constructor description
Peter,
thanks for the patch and the feedback. I also saw that "rubbish" in
between, when I ran the transformation over a file that contained XML for
all qooxdoo classes last night.
> After that, aptana liked the file much more!
Again my question: How do you "feed" this file to Aptana?!
> Unfort
Hi Thomas,
sorry for the late reply but some other issues kept us busy here.
The XSL seems to have a problem with the "descr" nodes (See the "long" line in
the middle of the following output)
...
qx.core.Version = function(){return this;}
qx.core.Version = {
__init : function(){;},
toString
Hey guys,
here is a very first whack at the issue. I've attached an XSL file
(sorry for the ceremonious header). You can run it e.g. on the class XML
for qx.application.Basic (from one of my earlier posts), and it will
produce output that is already pretty close to Peter's code assist file
en
Peter Schneider wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> unfortunately I am not able to provide you with any information about the
> structure. The description Petr replied to this post is more than I knew ;)
>
> The generated file was more of a workaround, due to the fact that we didn't
> found any working solutio
OK, I have sent you a PM and think that speaking using IM should be
good. I also think we should still post progress here though to keep the
thread alive and also get more feedback from other users.
petr kobalicek wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Very thank for your interest.
>
> I try to explain the
Hi Matthew,
Very thank for your interest.
I try to explain the basic idea of this. (First, I don't know how for
example jseclipse works, but on the other side, it must work to understand
javascript, so the output must be classic javascript solution of objects,
inheritance, etc..) So, output must
I am quite comfortable with XSLT but don't know the necessary format for
the output (code assist) file.
I think perhaps a good start would be to take some well defined classes
from the qx namespace and manually transform these into a well defined
structure that an IDE could use. After that I (a
Hi Thomas,
unfortunately I am not able to provide you with any information about the
structure. The description Petr replied to this post is more than I knew ;)
The generated file was more of a workaround, due to the fact that we didn't
found any working solution that could handle qooxdoo 0.7.x p
Thomas,
There is probably not too much to know about formats. These IDE plugins
uderstands javascript, so for example this construct is parsed and used in
intellisence:
a = function() {};
// method
a.prototype.test = function() {};
// static ?
a.test = function() {};
etc...
I'm interested in xs
>
> As you proposed, something like
>
> #> make api
> #> make aptana_api
>
> would be veery nice!
> By using the same generator that is used for the API, users can both build
> "code assist file" for qooxdo-API only _and_ for their complete project.
>
As a start, could you and others w
Hi Thomas,
I'm cutting your post a bit for better reading...
> [...]
> Exactly! To make it more tangible I'd like to get back to Peter's
> posting. If you look at his text file...
> [...]
> and then at the generated XML for the same class:
> [...]
> it looks like it would be straight-forward to
Hi,
In the PHP World there is MetaL (for MetaLanguage) please take a look at
www.meta-language.net
It is already binded to PHP 5 OO & Java.
This is just a though and I don't know where to go from here
Before Printing, Think about Your Environmental Responsibility!
Avant d'Imprimer, Pensez à Votr
Matthew Gregory wrote:
> thron7 you genius!
>
Ah, you much too flattering ... I'm actually standing on the shoulders
of giants, trying to keep the balance ;).
> That sounds pretty much perfect for what we wanted. IIRC we would also
> be able to use the JAVADOC comments to display useful mess
petr kobalicek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I'm pleyed with jseclipse from adobe. On their website is that
> it supports qooxdoo, but not latest object oriented system. I have
> simple question. Not all IDE understands this object oriented system
> today, and only few will understand it in the future.
Hi Guilherme, hi Petr,
yepp, there is currently no IDE available which fully supports the
qooxdoo object oriented system.
However, there is work in progress to provide qooxdoo-specific
development support for the Eclipse IDE.
More infos available at: http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/contrib/qxd
That's a good idea. It would solve my problems with aptana too.
2008/7/5 petr kobalicek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> today I'm pleyed with jseclipse from adobe. On their website is that it
> supports qooxdoo, but not latest object oriented system. I have simple
> question. Not all IDE understan
Hi,
today I'm pleyed with jseclipse from adobe. On their website is that it
supports qooxdoo, but not latest object oriented system. I have simple
question. Not all IDE understands this object oriented system today, and
only few will understand it in the future. So I have an idea ;-)
Qooxdoo cont
Bill,
> So I'm ready to plunge into the IDE world. I've installed Eclipse, and
> have the Adobe JSEclipse plug-in ready to install. Is Adobe the right
> place to get it?
>
Yes, Adobe have taken over JSEclipse, and they are distributing it.
> I'm also aware of the Aptana plug-in for Eclipse, an
So I'm ready to plunge into the IDE world. I've installed Eclipse, and
have the Adobe JSEclipse plug-in ready to install. Is Adobe the right
place to get it?
I'm also aware of the Aptana plug-in for Eclipse, and that Aptana has
qooxdoo support.
Would the Aptana plug-in also have qooxdoo support
Hello,
any news on JSEclipse support for the new Class syntax? It would be
great to have autocompletion etc.
Thanks,
Christian
dperez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not going to post to this forum only for complaining about errors.
> <^O^>
>
> Here is some tip, I find useful:
>
> I use JSEclipse for edi
That's a great tip. Thanks
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dperez
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:00 PM
To: qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [qooxdoo-devel] JSEclipse templates
For avoiding it getting lo
For avoiding it getting lost, I created a wiki page:
http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/0.7/jseclipse_templates
Your contributions and ideas are welcome!
dperez wrote:
>
> Here is some tip, I find useful:
>
> I use JSEclipse for editing, and here are some sample templates (Window |
> Preferenc
Hi,
I'm not going to post to this forum only for complaining about errors.
<^O^>
Here is some tip, I find useful:
I use JSEclipse for editing, and here are some sample templates (Window |
Preferences | JSEclipse | Templates):
For creating a class:
qx.Class.define('${Class}', {
extend
Dietrich Streifert schrieb:
> New Answer to this topic from Adobe JSEcplipse Team.
>
> Sebastian, Andreas: it would be nice if you can take a few minutes and
> can give the Adobe guys some information about the stability of the
> new OO interface in 0.7 and maybe about soem guess when qooxdoo 0.7
>> It is in our plans to semantically supporting major frameworks like
>> qooxdoo.
That would be great! I am currently using JSEclipse and I think it is
good. Supporting qooxdoo would make the IDE much more powerful than now :).
Bye, Rusi
--
New Answer to this topic from Adobe JSEcplipse Team.
Sebastian, Andreas: it would be nice if you can take a few minutes and
can give the Adobe guys some information about the stability of the new
OO interface in 0.7 and maybe about soem guess when qooxdoo 0.7 will be
released.
If you like pu
Hello List,
I recently created a new topic in the Adobe JSEclipse forum asking for
support of the new OO syntax in qooxdoo 0.7.
I got an answer from a JSEclipse team member:
Hi level,
It is in our plans to semantically supporting major frameworks like
qooxdoo.
We would need to download 0.7
Hi Andreas,
I have asked for better Qooxdoo support in the JSEclipse forum. The more
people ask, the sooner it will be implemented.
Andreas Ecker-2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> there has been successful cooperation in the past that lead to official
> qooxdoo support in JSEclipse. We try to have JSEcl
Hello,
I have used both. Aptana comes in two flavours. Their own Eclipse based IDE
and an Aptana plugin for Eclipse. Aptana's code assist capability is more
powerful than JSEclipse. It also allows you to build your custom code
completion profiles. Also it differentiates functions, classes, object
Hi,
there has been successful cooperation in the past that lead to official
qooxdoo support in JSEclipse. We try to have JSEclipse leverage the new
OO sysntax and features (some of those correspond to powerful Java
features). Hope to see a qooxdoo-supporting JSEclipse in the near future.
On a
Hi Alex,
I will also use JSEclipse. Currently, it gets a little confused with the
proto syntax of the 0.5.x qooxdoo version. Even though it is an invaluable
tool. I don't know any better Javascript editor.
Talk to them at their forum. They are willing to improve their product.
alex.d wrote
Hi all,
I would like to know whether JSEclipse will support the knew,
namespaces based
version of qooxdoo. It seems now that the plug-in does have some
problems with
recognizing of qooxdoo classes’ hierarchy. I consider to buy JSEclipse,
but if interakt is not going to provide support for qoox
excellent, it is very good.I am trying it, to Marco, maybe this link can give you a little helphttp://www.interaktonline.com/Products/Eclipse/JSEclipse/Product-Forum/Details/94436/dojo.html
2006/7/24, Marco Goebenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi!In the latest version of JSEclipse is as told in release n
Howdy!
ynstudio wrote:
> it seemed that there is no such a js editor yet. JsEditor in Eclipse can only
> recognize native object, such as window,document etc.
Actually, no. JSEclipse does recognize custom objects and not only the
rather simple hierarchy of native/DOM objects. It provides an obje
Hi!
In the latest version of JSEclipse is as told in release notes support
for qooxdoo integrated, somehow it should generate a xml file with
object properties and methods.
I try to ask in the JsEclipse forum and will tell you if I have success.
Regards
Marco
ynstudio schrieb:
> it seemed th
it seemed that there is no such a js editor yet. JsEditor in Eclipse can only
recognize native object, such as window,document etc.
it is hard to developer such a js editor, because you cannt tell what
properties a object you define could have until the code be executed.
but maybe somebody can pr
Hi!
Has anybody tried code completion with JsEclipse and qooxdoo.
Somehow it does not recognize the qooxdoo sources.
What I did, until now:
made a new project, and added the qooxdoo sources
project
|-qooxdoo
| |-core
| |-
|
|-test.js
and in test.js I tried:
var button = new QxButton("M
Version 1.5.1 (Mar 22nd, 2006)
This is a minor release that fixes some bugs that were reported in the
first week. It also fixes some outline issued and improves library
support based on initial feedback from the survey.
* fix bug that caused the outline to close unexpectedly
* add sup
41 matches
Mail list logo
