Re: svn properties....

2006-11-14 Thread John O'Hara
" to java/client/test/ example_build.xml to remove the space, hope nobody minds. --steve On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:39 AM, Steve Vinoski wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> I noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn >>

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-14 Thread John O'Hara
+1 to adding it. On 12/11/06, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/11/06, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we all then please set our svn clients to use the auto-props. We have had this problem with each svn repository the codebase has lived in and the problem with a s

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Robert Greig
On 13/11/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: do you want to write a mail to infra and cc us. Alternately if you irc.freenode.net and go to #asfinfra there is usually someone that can help on-line. Yes, I'll follow up with the infrastructure people via email. RG

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Carl Trieloff
Robert, do you want to write a mail to infra and cc us. Alternately if you irc.freenode.net and go to #asfinfra there is usually someone that can help on-line. Carl. Robert Greig wrote: On 13/11/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday November 13 2006 10:46 am, Alan Conway wro

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Robert Greig
On 13/11/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday November 13 2006 10:46 am, Alan Conway wrote: > Is it possible to get triggers to actually fix the properties rather > than just abort the commit and tell you to fix them? I don't think so. I don't think you can modify the transacti

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Steve Vinoski
On Nov 13, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Alan Conway wrote: Is it possible to get triggers to actually fix the properties rather than just abort the commit and tell you to fix them? Doesn't look that way -- the SVN book says the following. "Warning Do not attempt to modify the transaction using hook sc

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Monday November 13 2006 10:46 am, Alan Conway wrote: > Is it possible to get triggers to actually fix the properties rather > than just abort the commit and tell you to fix them? I don't think so. I don't think you can modify the transaction. In anycase, I'd still prefer the "abort and have

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Alan Conway
Is it possible to get triggers to actually fix the properties rather than just abort the commit and tell you to fix them? On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 10:25 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Monday November 13 2006 10:14 am, Robert Greig wrote: > > On 13/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Monday November 13 2006 10:14 am, Robert Greig wrote: > On 13/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't object at all to adding it, but seeing as how we're part of a > > much larger repository, could we even make such a change without > > getting buy-in across all the other pro

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Robert Greig
On 13/11/06, Steve Vinoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't object at all to adding it, but seeing as how we're part of a much larger repository, could we even make such a change without getting buy-in across all the other projects sharing this repository? Yes that could be a problem. What w

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Steve Vinoski
I don't object at all to adding it, but seeing as how we're part of a much larger repository, could we even make such a change without getting buy-in across all the other projects sharing this repository? --steve On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote: +1 to adding it. Carl. R

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-13 Thread Carl Trieloff
+1 to adding it. Carl. Robert Greig wrote: On 10/11/06, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can we all then please set our svn clients to use the auto-props. We have had this problem with each svn repository the codebase has lived in and the problem with a solution that relies upon ev

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-12 Thread Robert Greig
On 10/11/06, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can we all then please set our svn clients to use the auto-props. We have had this problem with each svn repository the codebase has lived in and the problem with a solution that relies upon everyone configuring their clients is that: 1) n

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
's script > in bin, and put the svn-auto-props file in etc. > > --steve > > > Carl. > > > > Steve Vinoski wrote: > >> On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >>> I noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn &

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-10 Thread Martin Ritchie
ote: >> >> On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >> >>> >>> I noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn >>> properties set on >>> them so they end up with mixed cr/lf issues, wrong mime types when >>> browsing, etc.

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-09 Thread Steve Vinoski
under trunk/qpid, put Dan's script in bin, and put the svn-auto-props file in etc. --steve Carl. Steve Vinoski wrote: On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn properties set on them so they end up with mixed cr

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-09 Thread Steve Vinoski
9, 2006, at 11:39 AM, Steve Vinoski wrote: On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn properties set on them so they end up with mixed cr/lf issues, wrong mime types when browsing, etc That's probably not a good thing.

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-09 Thread Gordon Sim
Steve Vinoski wrote: Unless someone objects, I'll run this script today in the Java tree and commit it. I'd rather leave the C++ tree to Alan or Gordon and the Ruby and Python trees to Rafi, unless you guys want me to take care of those trees too, just let me know. Done on cpp tree.

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-09 Thread Martin Ritchie
epository for the same reason. Probably should add an Apache header to it. Dan > Carl. > > Steve Vinoski wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> I noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn properties > >> set on > >> them

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
; Not at all. A slightly different version is already checked into the tuscany repository for the same reason. Probably should add an Apache header to it. Dan > Carl. > > Steve Vinoski wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> I noticed that

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-09 Thread Carl Trieloff
noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn properties set on them so they end up with mixed cr/lf issues, wrong mime types when browsing, etc That's probably not a good thing. Dan, good catch. I was about to send a similar note, as last night I found a bunch of so

Re: svn properties....

2006-11-09 Thread Steve Vinoski
On Nov 9, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: I noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn properties set on them so they end up with mixed cr/lf issues, wrong mime types when browsing, etc That's probably not a good thing. Dan, good catch. I was about

svn properties....

2006-11-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
I noticed that a lot of files in qpid don't have any svn properties set on them so they end up with mixed cr/lf issues, wrong mime types when browsing, etc That's probably not a good thing. I've attached a little bash shell script that I use to fix up issues like that in