Re: 0.32 Outlook and TLS

2006-02-27 Thread Devin Carraway
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 06:38:27PM -0800, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote: > >(Aside: it would be nice to have qpsmtpd run on multiple ports > >without having to run another > >copy.) > > I think with the 0.40/trunk branch that'll be a lot easier to do. > (Personally I like using the firewall softwar

Re: 0.32 Outlook and TLS

2006-02-27 Thread sub-qpsm-tpd
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote: > On Feb 27, 2006, at 6:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [.] > > That's what I expected. So, is there a way to implement qpsmtpd on > > port 465, accepting a straight SSL/TLS connection? > > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qp

Re: 0.32 Outlook and TLS

2006-02-27 Thread John Peacock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So, is there a way to implement qpsmtpd on port 465, accepting a straight > SSL/TLS connection? Yes: http://wiki.qpsmtpd.org/smtps HTH John

Re: 0.32 Outlook and TLS

2006-02-27 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Feb 27, 2006, at 6:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [.] That's what I expected. So, is there a way to implement qpsmtpd on port 465, accepting a straight SSL/TLS connection? http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/4545 http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd;max=4566 (A

Re: 0.32 Outlook and TLS

2006-02-27 Thread sub-qpsm-tpd
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Charlie Brady wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have ports 587 and 465 NATed to port 25 ... > > That might be OK for port 587, but not for 465. SMTP is a plain text > protocol, until TLS is negotiated by STARTTLS. Port 465 is SMTP over TLS, > an

Re: 0.32 Outlook and TLS

2006-02-27 Thread Charlie Brady
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have ports 587 and 465 NATed to port 25 ... That might be OK for port 587, but not for 465. SMTP is a plain text protocol, until TLS is negotiated by STARTTLS. Port 465 is SMTP over TLS, and launches straight into SSL/TLS before anythin

Re: [perl #38347] rhsbl patch to allow TXT entries

2006-02-27 Thread Shad L. Lords
It appears that most rhsbl entries now contain txt entries. I've patch the plugin to behave similar to dnsbl but also maintain backward compability. If you just list the server it will use the TXT entry. If you pass a second arg then it will pass that back to the client. I was applying this

0.32 Outlook and TLS

2006-02-27 Thread sub-qpsm-tpd
I have ports 587 and 465 NATed to port 25, and port 25 is being used for qpsmtpd-forkserver, and I'm testing connections to all three ports. I can get an Outlook connection (Outlook 2000 on a WIN2000 system) to use AUTH LOGIN and be successful. What I can't do is get TLS to work with it.

[perl #38649] cleanup rhsbl and dnsbl

2006-02-27 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Ask Bjoern Hansen # Please include the string: [perl #38649] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38649 > rhsbl and dnsbl could share a good chunk of code with the plugin inheritance sy

0.32 logging complete inbound message

2006-02-27 Thread sub-qpsm-tpd
Hm, where is this being done? I'm using loglevel set to 5, which otherwise seems to give me what I want. But I'd like to change the loglevel of the message trace so it doesn't show up. Can someone tell me where to look, please? Thanks.

Re: [patch] Doc patch for Qpsmtpd::Connection

2006-02-27 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Feb 25, 2006, at 8:37 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: I couldn't find docs for $connection->relay_client, so I added them and a few more methods in Qpsmtpd::Connection. Thanks, committed. - ask -- http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/

[svn:qpsmtpd] r622 - branches/0.3x branches/0.3x/lib/Qpsmtpd

2006-02-27 Thread ask
Author: ask Date: Mon Feb 27 13:43:08 2006 New Revision: 622 Modified: / (props changed) branches/0.3x/Changes branches/0.3x/lib/Qpsmtpd/Connection.pm Log: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ask | 2006-02-27 13:42:54 -0800 Improve Qpsmtpd::Transaction documentation (Fred Moyer) Modified: branches

[svn:qpsmtpd] r621 - branches/0.3x branches/0.3x/plugins/virus

2006-02-27 Thread ask
Author: ask Date: Mon Feb 27 13:43:04 2006 New Revision: 621 Modified: / (props changed) branches/0.3x/Changes branches/0.3x/plugins/virus/clamdscan Log: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ask | 2006-02-27 13:41:42 -0800 Make the clamdscan plugin temporarily deny mail if if can't talk to clamd (Fi

[svn:qpsmtpd] r620 - branches/0.3x/lib

2006-02-27 Thread ask
Author: ask Date: Mon Feb 27 13:43:00 2006 New Revision: 620 Modified: / (props changed) branches/0.3x/lib/Qpsmtpd.pm Log: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ask | 2006-02-27 13:41:09 -0800 set the version to 0.33-dev Modified: branches/0.3x/lib/Qpsmtpd.pm ===

Re: qpsmtpd contribs

2006-02-27 Thread Gordon Rowell
John Peacock wrote: I don't view it as a terrible hardship for the site admin to move anything out of contrib/ into plugins/ in order to use is (since that is exactly what happens today). Yep. Or symlink to contribs/plugins/... For the record, my proposal was a contribs/ folder at the top le

Re: [announce] qpsmtpd 0.32 - clamdscan

2006-02-27 Thread Filippo Carletti
0.32 - 2006/02/26 ... A few fixes to the clamdscan plugin (Dave Rolsky) The patch I suggested to return DENYSOFT if clamd is not pingable was reverted. Sorry to have discovered it too late. http://svn.perl.org/viewcvs/qpsmtpd/trunk/plugins/virus/clamdscan?r1=587&r2=588 Ciao, Filippo

Re: qpsmtpd contribs

2006-02-27 Thread John Peacock
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: It'd be nice if it could be structured in a way so it's easy to enable the plugins in contribs/ and also support things that are not plugins. The plugin loader code assumes everything lives in plugins/, so unless you are suggesting that contribs/ lives under plugins/, w