Robert Spier wrote:
Well, it really depends. If you're creating it once in the parent and
then using the copies in the child, you'll actually save time. With
modern operating systems, a fork is actually pretty cheap. Most use
copy-on-write, so it doesn't matter too much how big the process is,
I've just added a rudimentary config server to the high_perf branch.
This allows you to connect on localhost to check number of concurrent
connections and the number of pending dns queries.
I have a few thoughts on other things that can be done, but I'd also
like feedback on what people would
What else would you like to see me add to this?
Current connections.
Top-connecting hosts.
On 26 Apr 2005, at 13:50, Bob wrote:
Pause/Continue, not so simple. I can appreciate that there would
be lots of state issues to handle to deliver a simple sounding feature.
Well it would be more like stop accepting connections and then
resume accepting. It's really trivial to do that :-)
Matt.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:55:07 -0400
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What else would you like to see me add to this?
List of current connections with whatever information about the connection
is handy, especially time of connect and remote ip. Like ps. Since there
are likely to be
Hi,
I've looked around in the docs and on the list archives for TLS support
in qpsmtpd but haven't found any information. Is this functionality
that still needs to be done? Or maybe it's something that can be
accomplished using the Apache::Qpsmtpd plugin with mod_ssl?
Thanks in advance for any
I've looked around in the docs and on the list archives for TLS support
in qpsmtpd but haven't found any information.
To my latest knowledge this has still not been done. I always wanted to take
a look into this, because it should not be too complicated given that there
are ready available
Fred Moyer wrote:
I've looked around in the docs and on the list archives for TLS support
in qpsmtpd but haven't found any information. Is this functionality
that still needs to be done? Or maybe it's something that can be
accomplished using the Apache::Qpsmtpd plugin with mod_ssl?
I think the
I think the consensus (in July/August 2004) was to use stunnel as a
wrapper around qpsmtpd, e.g.
Thats not a solution for the problem. While this will enable SMTPS (which
happens to be the secure version of SMTP like HTTP/HTTPS), this is not of
much use as SMTPS is mostly dead in favor of TLS.
Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 26 Apr 2005, at 15:00, Michael Holzt wrote:
I think the consensus (in July/August 2004) was to use stunnel as a
wrapper around qpsmtpd, e.g.
Thats not a solution for the problem. While this will enable SMTPS
(which
happens to be the secure version of SMTP like
Is anyone else seeing this in high_perf?
The log message would look something like this:
Can't call method log on an undefined value at
.../lib/Qpsmtpd/Plugin.pm line 47.
(That line number will be off because I've modified Plugin.pm.)
When a Danga callback is called, a call to Plugin's
Brian Grossman wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:55:07 -0400
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What else would you like to see me add to this?
List of current connections with whatever information about the connection
is handy, especially time of connect and remote ip. Like ps. Since
Bob wrote:
Brian Grossman wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:55:07 -0400
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What else would you like to see me add to this?
List of current connections with whatever information about the
connection
is handy, especially time of connect and remote ip. Like
Charlie Brady wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Bob wrote:
John Peacock wrote:
I think the consensus (in July/August 2004) was to use stunnel as a
wrapper around qpsmtpd, e.g.
exec tcpserver (flags) stunnel (flags) qpsmtpd
and stunnel (of recent enough vintage) will just proxy the SMTP
transaction
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:51:21 -0400
Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mainly wishing they would timeout? If they're hanging on
long enough to come to your attention, maybe a timeout
watchdog would work. Doesn't forkserver have one?
I was thinking in general, since there's other things I'd like to
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:14:00 -0400
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Apr 2005, at 14:51, Bob wrote:
Mainly wishing they would timeout? If they're hanging on
long enough to come to your attention, maybe a timeout
watchdog would work. Doesn't forkserver have one?
high_perf
On 26 Apr 2005, at 16:56, Brian Grossman wrote:
Erm, could you point one out to me for an example? I'm hoping in
particular to implement booting a connection when it doesn't say
anything
for several minutes. I do this in forkserver with SIG{ALRM}, for
example.
It just does it. It times out
Michael Holzt wrote:
a look into this, because it should not be too complicated given that there
are ready available TLS-functions for perl which can transform a given
connection into a secure one.
I don't see anything obvious on CPAN. Is there some module I'm not seeing that
supports TLS
18 matches
Mail list logo
