Re: thoughts about a new module called check_spammer_connect

2011-07-27 Thread Chris Lewis
On 7/26/2011 10:41 PM, Jared Johnson wrote: We discussed doing this once at my organization and someone astutely pointed out that considering that this is DNS, the better solution would really be to run a local caching DNS server, e.g. bind9 and point resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1 with forwarders to

Re: thoughts about a new module called check_spammer_connect

2011-07-27 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Jared Johnson wrote: That sounds like a pretty sweet configuration! [Note if you are running qpsmtpd-async, as we do, it's not really possible to route DNS queries differently for DNSBLs versus other DNS queries qpsmtpd does. ParaDNS doesn't handle paralleled DNS queries

Re: thoughts about a new module called check_spammer_connect

2011-07-27 Thread David Nicol
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Matt Sergeant m...@sergeant.org wrote: However I'm unlikely to maintain much on Qpsmtpd now that Haraka has taken off. Matt. how about a plugin adapter, so Haraka can use Qpsmtpd plugins or v/v? That probably implies either a node.js -- perl integration layer,

Re: thoughts about a new module called check_spammer_connect

2011-07-27 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, David Nicol wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Matt Sergeant m...@sergeant.org wrote: However I'm unlikely to maintain much on Qpsmtpd now that Haraka has taken off. Matt. how about a plugin adapter, so Haraka can use Qpsmtpd plugins or v/v? That probably implies

Re: thoughts about a new module called check_spammer_connect

2011-07-27 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Dear Chris, On Mit 27.07.2011 10:59, Chris Lewis wrote: On 7/26/2011 10:41 PM, Jared Johnson wrote: [snipp] Now each of our qpsmtpd instances has their own rbldnsd (serving ~700Mb zone consisting of almost all the DNSBLs we use as one merged zone) plus the Unbound DNS server package. This