From: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 23:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
No, it should be remote_IP.remote_port.local_port and should include a
transaction_within_connection count. I don't think that pid adds anything.
Isn't localport always 25?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues
the default run
script default to -c 10; that seems awfully low to me.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 710-B West 14th Street
Austin, TX 78701-1798
http://www.trinsics.com/blog
http
$timeout;
}
alarm(0);
}
If you have connections running for more than one hour, the client must
be saying something during this time.
You can try to lower the timeout parameter. Mine is 120s (maybe a
little short, but it works quite well).
Sydney.
--
Chris Garrigues
between plugins?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 710-B West 14th Street
Austin, TX 78701-1798
http://www.trinsics.com/blog
http://www.trinsics.com 512-322-0180
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:02:14 -0500
I'm trying to write a plugin which will sit in front of the greylisting
plugin
and keep it from greylisting messages to certain addresses.
I thought from my initial reading of the code that if I put a note
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:27:42 -0500
Hi all,
I've been using qpsmtpd for about 6 months now but I've just signed up for
this list. I recently upgraded to 0.40 and I'm running on a modified
Mandriva
using qmail and with qpsmtpd running under
From: Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:49:02 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Chris Garrigues wrote:
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:27:42 -0500
...
Any idea what's going on here? It requires a -9 to kill the processes
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:02:21 -0500
From: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:02:14 -0500
I'm trying to write a plugin which will sit in front of the greylisting
plugin
and keep it from greylisting messages
rcpthosts get
moved to check_relay?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 710-B West 14th Street
Austin, TX 78701-1798
http://www.trinsics.com/blog
http://www.trinsics.com 512
, but by 1.0 I hope it's no longer true. Is there a roadmap which states
when along the way the distribution will include fixes like this one and
some documentation on the use of notes for whitelists and other stuff like
that?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
From: Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:33:33 +0200
Chris Garrigues wrote:
Two weeks into membership on this list and I'm beginning to realize that
the
design of plugins is utterly chaotic. Since we're at 0.40, I guess that's
okay, but by 1.0 I hope it's
really should look at what else is out there first.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 710-B West 14th Street
Austin, TX 78701-1798
http://www.trinsics.com/blog
http
12 matches
Mail list logo
