Re: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-07 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 6-Sep-07, at 8:29 PM, Robert Spier wrote: Some of this will be easier to fix if if let plugins register to be run first and last. Eeep. No. I like the strict ordering guarantees given by the config file. The first/last stuff ends up just being a morass. Yes, if you want that, use

Roll your own vs. default distro (was: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?)

2007-09-06 Thread Johan Almqvist
Chris Garrigues wrote: Two weeks into membership on this list and I'm beginning to realize that the design of plugins is utterly chaotic. Since we're at 0.40, I guess that's okay, but by 1.0 I hope it's no longer true. Is there a roadmap which states when along the way the distribution will

Re: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-06 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Chris Garrigues wrote: okay...you've demonstrated that the other more sensible way works fine...so why does the default distribution do it the way it does? Isn't it mostly a matter of poor naming ? Those plugins were some of the first ones when we weren't so

Re: Roll your own vs. default distro (was: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?)

2007-09-06 Thread Chris Garrigues
From: Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:33:33 +0200 Chris Garrigues wrote: Two weeks into membership on this list and I'm beginning to realize that the design of plugins is utterly chaotic. Since we're at 0.40, I guess that's okay, but by 1.0 I hope it's

Re: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-06 Thread John Levine
Isn't it mostly a matter of poor naming ? Only partly, a lot is you need ... The plan is, eventually, to have proper APIs and plugin hooks for some of the things notes are used for now (whitelists, user information, ). Yeah. For example, I have several plugins that check something

Re: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-06 Thread Robert Spier
Some of this will be easier to fix if if let plugins register to be run first and last. Eeep. No. I like the strict ordering guarantees given by the config file. The first/last stuff ends up just being a morass.

Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-05 Thread Chris Garrigues
I just noticed some entries in my greylist for mail from the outside world destined for domains that aren't mine and thought Oh oh, am I an open relay? I quickly determined that I'm not, so I thought I'd try to understand why messages which will be denied due to relaying are even touching my

Re: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-05 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2007-09-05 14:06:32 -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: I just noticed some entries in my greylist for mail from the outside world destined for domains that aren't mine and thought Oh oh, am I an open relay? I quickly determined that I'm not, so I thought I'd try to understand why messages

Re: Theory behind rcpt_ok doing relaying check?

2007-09-05 Thread Chris Garrigues
From: Peter J. Holzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:36:37 +0200 Why doesn't rcpt_ok just return(OK) and the logic for testing rcpthosts get moved to check_relay? Have a look at http://svn.perl.org/viewcvs/qpsmtpd/contrib/hjp/rcpt_accept/rcpt_accept?view=markuprev=638