On 07/05/2016 02:21 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:26:51AM -0400, Chris Laprise wrote:
If I replace the kernel with 4.1 from R3.1, it can make it to the AEM target
and the decrypt prompt. It chokes just after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:08:52AM +, Facundo Curti wrote:
> 2016-07-12 2:02 GMT+00:00 Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <
> marma...@invisiblethingslab.com>:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-11 20:13, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:49:28PM -0700, Andrew David Wong wrote:
>> On 2016-07-11 19:43, Adam Steen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Andrew David Wong
>>>
Gustavo Lapido Loureiro:
> I changed my personal vm max memory to 8 GB since this will be the vm
> where I plan to run most of my applications, most of them memory
> consuming (Firefox with hundreds of opened tabs, video playing, image
> processing...). Initial memory was automatically adjusted to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-11 19:43, Adam Steen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Andrew David Wong
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 2016-07-11 19:17, Adam Steen wrote:
>>> Edit: Include mailing
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Andrew David Wong
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-07-11 19:17, Adam Steen wrote:
> > Edit: Include mailing list.
> >
> > Hi Andrew
> >
> > Thank you for all the hard work you put into the project, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-11 19:17, Adam Steen wrote:
> Edit: Include mailing list.
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Thank you for all the hard work you put into the project, you seem to have
> the patients of a saint, sometimes dealing with people is the hardest
> part!
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:56:58AM +, Facundo Curti wrote:
> It seems endless. :P I had another error. So I downloaded the sources
> again, and retry...
>
> When I make vmm-xen-vm, now I have this error:
>
(...)
> ==> Finished making:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-11 18:31, Adam wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does the Fedora Minimal Template still exist? I am unable to install it as
> per https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/templates/fedora-minimal/
>
> Cheers Adam
>
Yes, AFAIK it should still be available. (I'm
On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 11:57:04 AM UTC-7, gaikokuji...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 12:29:28 PM UTC+11:30, gaikokuji...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 9:50:10 AM UTC+12, Chris Laprise wrote:
> > > On 07/06/2016 09:31 AM, gaikokujinkyofu...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-07-11 00:24, Drew White wrote:
> On Monday, 11 July 2016 00:10:10 UTC+10, Andrew David Wong wrote:
>>> https://www.deepdotweb.com/2016/03/12/
>>> does-qube-os-has-a-leak-hole/ Has some Qubes dev contacted with
>>> this guys?
>>>
>>>
>>
I changed my personal vm max memory to 8 GB since this will be the vm where I
plan to run most of my applications, most of them memory consuming (Firefox
with hundreds of opened tabs, video playing, image processing...). Initial
memory was automatically adjusted to 800 MB. Memory balancing is
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Niels Kobschätzki
wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2016 14:55, danmichaels8...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > I have a Blue Mic Yeti and am trying to get it working with QUBES.
> >
> > I tried attaching audio to a VM, but it didn't work.
> >
> > I need a
So I'm having a really hard time assigning USB devices.
Here is what happens with the Yeti mic.
I am in QUBES 3.2
When I plug in the mic, it actually immediately shows up in the audio mixer,
under "capture devices".. I also see it in Pulse audio manager.
The question is then just how to
On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 11:27:54 AM UTC-4, NewbieG wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> So far, fascinated with Qubes-os. I'm having an issue though: cannot use my
> USB 3.0 port. I've tried to follow instructions from
> https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/assigning-devices/ with no luck so far.
>
> #lspci
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Gustavo Lapido Loureiro <
gustavo.lap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a tool where I can monitor network traffic for the whole physical
> computer?
>
> If I understood Qubes OS, the tool I'm refering to should sit on Dom0,
> right?
>
>
No, there is no
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 12:29:28 PM UTC+11:30, gaikokuji...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 9:50:10 AM UTC+12, Chris Laprise wrote:
> > On 07/06/2016 09:31 AM, gaikokujinkyofu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 5:40:20 AM UTC-4, Chris Laprise wrote:
> >
On 07/11/2016 05:24 PM, Duncan Guthrie wrote:
> On 11/07/16 15:14, neilhard...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Is it possible that someone who compromised QUBES, could re-write
>> the AppVM in a way that whenever it is loaded up, it re-infects the
>> entire system all over again...?
>
>
> If someone
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 1:30:46 AM UTC+2, Unman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:39:00AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:23:42PM +0100, Unman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:33:47PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> > > wrote:
> > > > On
Hi,
Is there a tool where I can monitor network traffic for the whole physical
computer?
If I understood Qubes OS, the tool I'm refering to should sit on Dom0, right?
A tool like Gnome System Monitor is what I'm thinking about, as it shows
network traffic, but I could only find it in the
Hello List,
So far, fascinated with Qubes-os. I'm having an issue though: cannot use my USB
3.0 port. I've tried to follow instructions from
https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/assigning-devices/ with no luck so far.
#lspci -k
04:00.0 USB controller [0c03]: NEC Corporation uPD720200 USB 3.0 Host
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/07/16 15:14, neilhard...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is it possible that someone who compromised QUBES, could re-write
> the AppVM in a way that whenever it is loaded up, it re-infects
> the entire system all over again...?
>
> In that case, the only
Is it possible that someone who compromised QUBES, could re-write the AppVM in
a way that whenever it is loaded up, it re-infects the entire system all over
again...?
In that case, the only safe thing would be to manually back up the files within
the AppVM with some sort of Fedora backup tool.
I have a question about the security of backing up QUBES.
I see that the VM backup procedure lets you back up both template VMs and App
VMs, as well as dom0.
The question is... let's say that we find out about another Xen escape, like
the one from October 2015.
At this point, surely we now
My firewall rules allows for everything but when I do a traceroute from a vm to
my NAS on my lan all traffic goes trough my VPN to the public internet.
MyVM -> VPN (proxyVM) - > sys-firewall -> sys-net
tried this setup as well
MyVM -> sys-firewall -> VPN (proxyVM) -> sys-net
Then I figured
send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/2b138695-d362-4e85-8fe5-4670bf234ddf%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Qubes-HCL-Clevo-P65_P67SG___-20160
I have to say from a user experience... figuring that all out was hell.
When you look at what I did.. I essentially added 2 main bits to the code
mapbs=1
noexitboot=1
I really just wonder.. if there's any reason QUBES developers couldn't just add
these 2 lines themselves, so that the user
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 22:13:30 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> There is no other limit than your hardware.
If this is true, then please, why is mine only 100 Mbps behind the NetVM when I
have a 1Gbps NIC?
I have multiple things monitoring the network activity, and it only ever
On Monday, 11 July 2016 17:07:26 UTC+10, Drew White wrote:
> On Saturday, 9 July 2016 22:13:30 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > Replace your 100Mbps network card with a 1Gbps one.
>
> FYI: If you read my original post you would see that I have a 1Gbps NIC...
In fact, I should
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 22:13:30 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Replace your 100Mbps network card with a 1Gbps one.
FYI: If you read my original post you would see that I have a 1Gbps NIC...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 22:13:30 UTC+10, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Replace your 100Mbps network card with a 1Gbps one. There is no other
> limit than your hardware. For example I get this:
>
> [user@testvm ~]$ wget -O - qb/pub/bigfile >/dev/null
> - --2016-07-09 14:10:19--
31 matches
Mail list logo