Re: [qubes-users] hdparm?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2018-02-05 10:57, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote: > On Mon, February 5, 2018 4:37 pm, 'Guillaume Bertin' via qubes-users wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I don't manage installing hdparm in dom0. No package... >> >> >> Have I missed something? Should

Re: [qubes-users] Fedora-minimal und Q. 4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2018-02-05 08:47, Jo wrote: > Cheers folks, > > because of the switch to 4,0 im currently setting up a complete new > system-structure, and therefore, i wanted to base all the sys-vms > on fedora minimal templates. > > However, im missing a few

Re: [qubes-users] How to deal with Yubikey ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 03:42:51PM -, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote: > On Sun, February 4, 2018 7:16 am, ThierryIT wrote: > > > > > I have check it, but when doing a "dnf list installed "qubes-*" on my > > sys-usb, I can see that

Re: [qubes-users] hdparm?

Original Message On February 5, 2018 6:22 PM, donoban wrote: > Sorry I mean 'sudo qubes-dom0-update hdparm' Many thanks, that was indeed simple (and documented). "yum install" was definetely not the way to do it. awokd: thanks for your advise. I want to

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes 4.0 without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi or Interrupt Remapping

On 02/05/2018 05:20 PM, brendan.h...@gmail.com wrote: PS - The W520 also is the last W5xx to support a nice Thinkpad keyboard. :) I too recommend the W520 if you want a mobile workstation style laptop, with coreboot you can also buy and install a quad core ivy bridge CPU. The G505S however

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes 4.0 without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi or Interrupt Remapping

On Mon, February 5, 2018 9:39 pm, Utility Panel wrote: > Ah. I hadn't considered the Coreboot option. My understanding is that the > chipset is at fault. > > The only documentation I've found was forwarded to me from another user > on this list. It explains a solution that Zen recommended for

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes 4.0 without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi or Interrupt Remapping

On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 4:33:57 PM UTC-5, awokd wrote: > On Mon, February 5, 2018 9:20 pm, Utility Panel wrote: > > On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 4:12:50 PM UTC-5, Rusty Bird wrote: > > >>> Can anyone tell me what I might expect without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi and > >>> Interrupt Remapping? >

Re: [qubes-users] Re: templates update fail over sys-usb (but work using sys-net, on Qubes 4.x rc4)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 02:21:45PM -0800, Dave C wrote: > On Saturday, February 3, 2018 at 1:56:14 PM UTC-8, Yuraeitha wrote: > [ ... snip ... ] > > > It might be a good idea to put this on github, chances are that they might > > fix it soon if

Re: [qubes-users] qvm-usb is broken in Qubes 4.0 rc4

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 05:50:12PM -0800, Fabrizio Romano Genovese wrote: > Hello all, > > When I try to attach my webcam to any appvm, I get the following message: > > Device attach failed: /usr/lib/qubes/usb-import: line 32: >

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes 4.0 without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi or Interrupt Remapping

On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 4:12:50 PM UTC-5, Rusty Bird wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Utility Panel: > > Can anyone tell me what I might expect without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi and > > Interrupt Remapping? > >

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes 4.0 without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi or Interrupt Remapping

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Utility Panel: > Can anyone tell me what I might expect without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi and > Interrupt Remapping? https://www.qubes-os.org/faq/#can-i-install-qubes-4x-on-a-system-without-vt-x-or-vt-d Rusty -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[qubes-users] HCL - Dell Inspiron 7577 Laptop "New Inspiron 15 7000 Gaming"

ogle.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/CAM9FSFyDPx-qAY0LaJoz8-ofd_caES_C8kkk2Q6eKt6TRw8a3Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. Qubes-HCL-Dell_Inc_-Inspiron_7577-20180205-151442.yml Description: application/yaml

Re: [qubes-users] hdparm?

On Mon, February 5, 2018 5:43 pm, donoban wrote: > On 02/05/2018 06:38 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote: > >> On Mon, February 5, 2018 5:22 pm, donoban wrote: >>> Sorry I mean 'sudo qubes-dom0-update hdparm' Sure enough, I tried the above on both versions and it worked just fine. (But the

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Manager / Qubes 4.0 R3 ?

On Mon, February 5, 2018 6:01 pm, 'Tom Zander' via qubes-users wrote: > On Monday, 5 February 2018 04:34:35 CET Tim W wrote: > >> People complain about doc being outdated..then fix them. >> > > If someone can figure out how to port-forward in 4.0, please do update > the docs. I never managed

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Manager / Qubes 4.0 R3 ?

On Mon, February 5, 2018 5:57 pm, 'Tom Zander' via qubes-users wrote: > On Monday, 5 February 2018 08:00:35 CET 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote: > > Release candidates are, like the word describes, not made unless the > developers are thinking that its ready to release but needs more > real-world

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Manager / Qubes 4.0 R3 ?

On Monday, 5 February 2018 04:34:35 CET Tim W wrote: > People complain about doc being outdated..then fix them. If someone can figure out how to port-forward in 4.0, please do update the docs. I never managed to get that working. The firewall page can also be a bit more detailed as-is, it

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Manager / Qubes 4.0 R3 ?

On Monday, 5 February 2018 08:00:35 CET 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote: > Why are you complaining about bugs when running a ".0rc" version? They're > to be expected; if not the point of release candidates. Actually... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Release_candidate

Re: [qubes-users] hdparm?

On 02/05/2018 06:38 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote: > On Mon, February 5, 2018 5:22 pm, donoban wrote: >> >> Sorry I mean 'sudo qubes-dom0-update hdparm' > > That's interesting, what version of Qubes? I tried that before (thought it > was hdparm too) and ran into the same missing package

Re: [qubes-users] hdparm?

On Mon, February 5, 2018 5:22 pm, donoban wrote: > > On 02/05/2018 06:21 PM, donoban wrote: > >> On 02/05/2018 05:37 PM, 'Guillaume Bertin' via qubes-users wrote: >> >>> I don't manage installing hdparm in dom0. No package... > > Sorry I mean 'sudo qubes-dom0-update hdparm' That's interesting,

Re: [qubes-users] Issues with 4.0 rc4

On 02/04/2018 04:52 PM, Chris Laprise wrote: On 02/04/2018 07:10 AM, Nuno Branco wrote: 2) When restoring VMs from Qubes 3.2 the software does not seem to work if you select more than one VM to restore at a time. By this I mean the restore process launches and finishes and I do have a VM listed

Re: [qubes-users] hdparm?

On 02/05/2018 06:21 PM, donoban wrote: > On 02/05/2018 05:37 PM, 'Guillaume Bertin' via qubes-users wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I don't manage installing hdparm in dom0. No package... >> >> Have I missed something? Should harddisk management be done outside of dom0? >> > > 'sudo qubes-dom0-update

Re: [qubes-users] hdparm?

On 02/05/2018 05:37 PM, 'Guillaume Bertin' via qubes-users wrote: > Hi, > > I don't manage installing hdparm in dom0. No package... > > Have I missed something? Should harddisk management be done outside of dom0? > 'sudo qubes-dom0-update hdpardm' worked for me on Qubes 3.2 -- You received

Re: [qubes-users] hdparm?

On Mon, February 5, 2018 4:37 pm, 'Guillaume Bertin' via qubes-users wrote: > Hi, > > > I don't manage installing hdparm in dom0. No package... > > > Have I missed something? Should harddisk management be done outside of > dom0? Usually, for security reasons you should avoid installing software

[qubes-users] hdparm?

Hi, I don't manage installing hdparm in dom0. No package... Have I missed something? Should harddisk management be done outside of dom0? G. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[qubes-users] Qubes 4.0 without IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi or Interrupt Remapping

I installed Qubes 4.0-rc4 on a machine with hardware that cannot support the following two features IOMMU/VT-d/AMD-Vi Interrupt Remapping The installation went fine. I simply continued installing after the error message appeared just after the installation ISO completed its hardware check.

[qubes-users] Fedora-minimal und Q. 4.0

Cheers folks, because of the switch to 4,0 im currently setting up a complete new system-structure, and therefore, i wanted to base all the sys-vms on fedora minimal templates. However, im missing a few qubes-specific  functions and couldnt find informations on what to install to get them. Ive

[qubes-users] Please help with Qubes 4.0 rc4 on 8th Generation Intel

Hi, I have recently installed Qubes 4.0 rc4 on a new 8th generation Intel hardware and have an issue that I would like to get help with. The issue is that graphics appear to be very very slow. Each time there is some visual activity on the screen it is vary 'laggy'. I noticed that whenever

Re: [qubes-users] port filtering using Qubes firewall?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/05/2018 01:40 PM, Patrick Schleizer wrote: > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/firewall/ > > Is it possible to use "any" as address? > > In other words, is it possible to do simple port filtering? As in > block port XX or allow port YY only?

[qubes-users] Re: HCL - HP Z800 Workstation

On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 8:29:17 AM UTC-5, Utility Panel wrote: > On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 9:07:43 PM UTC-4, Emergency Mexican wrote: > > Here is some more data to add to the HCL. Qubes works out of the box, > > except the IOMMU due to a chipset errata. It looks like there is some

[qubes-users] Re: HCL - HP Z800 Workstation

On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 9:07:43 PM UTC-4, Emergency Mexican wrote: > Here is some more data to add to the HCL. Qubes works out of the box, except > the IOMMU due to a chipset errata. It looks like there is some work arounds > for getting the IOMMU to function without "Interrupt

[qubes-users] port filtering using Qubes firewall?

https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/firewall/ Is it possible to use "any" as address? In other words, is it possible to do simple port filtering? As in block port XX or allow port YY only? Cheers, Patrick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users"

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Manager / Qubes 4.0 R3 ?

On Sunday, 4 February 2018 21:00:55 CET 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote: > Working on it (where other contributors haven't already)! Am about halfway > through now. Sweet! -- Tom Zander Blog: https://zander.github.io Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel -- You received this

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes 4.0 / Qubes in general

On Monday, 5 February 2018 12:21:51 CET Tim W wrote: > I am currently going thru all the setup script qubes build template > options to find what templates compile correctly and what ones have bugs. > After that I am happy to write up a markdown page for how to compile and > install the Qubes

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Qubes Manager / Qubes 4.0 R3 ?

On Monday, 5 February 2018 02:33:02 CET Unman wrote: > You are, of > course, free to rewrite Qubes and its components in a language you're > comfortable with. Don't be so dramatic, I m not suggesting any such thing. -- Tom Zander Blog: https://zander.github.io Vlog:

[qubes-users] Re: Qubes 4.0 / Qubes in general

On Monday, February 5, 2018 at 4:37:26 AM UTC-5, rob_66 wrote: > On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 12:17:41 -0800 (PST) > Yuraeitha wrote: > > > I think discussion is good and healthy, though I don't feel it's entirely > > fair to paint it black > > and white like this. I can agree on

[qubes-users] Qubes 4.0 / Qubes in general

On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 12:17:41 -0800 (PST) Yuraeitha wrote: > I think discussion is good and healthy, though I don't feel it's entirely > fair to paint it black > and white like this. I can agree on many problems, but I think they look very > different in > different light