Keep your eye on this guy Andrew.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 10:36:12PM +1100, haaber wrote:
> > On 2/19/19 5:05 PM, ashleybrown...@tutanota.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Please, it would be greatly appreciated. Especially on how to ensure no
> > > clear traffic happens and that it only goes over tor.
> >
> > This is covered now
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 01:53:17PM -0600, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 19/02/2019 8.12 PM, unman wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 08:50:01PM +0100, r...@posteo.net wrote:
> >> On 2/17/19 10:49 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> Reading
On 2/19/19 5:05 PM, ashleybrown...@tutanota.com wrote:
Please, it would be greatly appreciated. Especially on how to ensure no
clear traffic happens and that it only goes over tor.
This is covered now here:
https://hackmd.io/JIXLStC-Sbq8rr1mjomCDQ
thank you for sharing this. Bernhard
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 19/02/2019 8.12 PM, unman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 08:50:01PM +0100, r...@posteo.net wrote:
>> On 2/17/19 10:49 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Reading through the post questioning the trustworthiness of
>>> Whonix, I can't tell
On 2/19/19 5:05 PM, ashleybrown...@tutanota.com wrote:
>
> Personally, I don't trust Whonix. The decision to not trust Whonix is
> not based on the sysadmin/aussie issue that came up recently on the
> list. I'm simply not convinced that they are capable of designing and
> writing
On 2/20/19 3:12 AM, unman wrote:
> Have you looked at the qubes-tor package and www.qubes-os.org/doc/torvm?
> - that page is removed from the menu but still available.
>
> The qubes-tor package is OK but with some tweaking makes a solid
> replacement for Whonix gw - certainly for live images and
Thanks for all you responses and thoughts. You have presented multiple
thoughtfull easy ways to think about this in plain English while politely
pointing out the flaws on the originally posed scenario. Although there
were several no’s and I understand their choice, my answer is Yes.
On Sun, Feb
I stopped using whonix a while ago. I wasn't huge on tor to begin with. I
was more in line with how Joanna originally felt about it.The only time I
used tor was to check security certificates. Then after the issue that
happened a year or two ago started using it as updatevm. But
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 08:50:01PM +0100, r...@posteo.net wrote:
> On 2/17/19 10:49 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Reading through the post questioning the trustworthiness of Whonix, I can't
> > tell whether we can continue trusting/using Whonix or not. Can someone
> > (preferably in a
r...@posteo.net wrote on 2/19/19 11:49 PM:
Clock synchronization over Tor is not rocket science and pretty much
straight forward.
True, but do the clocks in your client AppVMs differ from each other and
your main system's time? If not, they can possibly be correlated.
Rolling your own
On 2/19/19 6:45 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
> ashleybrown...@tutanota.com wrote on 2/19/19 4:05 PM:
>>
>>
>>> Creating a tor
>>> netvm is rather straight forward (and a dispvm that includes the Tor
>>> Browser if you like to use that as well). If there is enough interest, I
>>> can also
ashleybrown...@tutanota.com wrote on 2/19/19 4:05 PM:
Creating a tor
netvm is rather straight forward (and a dispvm that includes the Tor
Browser if you like to use that as well). If there is enough interest, I
can also write up a summary on how to do that in Qubes.
Please, it would be
> Personally, I don't trust Whonix. The decision to not trust Whonix is
> not based on the sysadmin/aussie issue that came up recently on the
> list. I'm simply not convinced that they are capable of designing and
> writing secure software. Furthermore, there is no reason to use whonix
> in the
On 2/17/19 10:49 PM, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> Reading through the post questioning the trustworthiness of Whonix, I can't
> tell whether we can continue trusting/using Whonix or not. Can someone
> (preferably in a position to speak for QubesOS), please state, in a
> straightforward and
I still trust Whonix...but the aussies, well you still got to watch them
regardless! :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, February 17, 2019 9:49 PM, wrote:
> Reading through the post questioning the trustworthiness of Whonix, I can't
> tell whether we can continue trusting/using Whonix or not. Can someone
> (preferably in a
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 22:06:21 +
"'awokd' via qubes-users" wrote:
>jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote on 2/17/19 9:49 PM:
>> Reading through the post questioning the trustworthiness of Whonix, I can't
>> tell whether we can continue trusting/using Whonix or not. Can someone
>> (preferably in a
jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote on 2/17/19 9:49 PM:
Reading through the post questioning the trustworthiness of Whonix, I can't
tell whether we can continue trusting/using Whonix or not. Can someone
(preferably in a position to speak for QubesOS), please state, in a
straightforward and unambiguous
Reading through the post questioning the trustworthiness of Whonix, I can't
tell whether we can continue trusting/using Whonix or not. Can someone
(preferably in a position to speak for QubesOS), please state, in a
straightforward and unambiguous manner, spell this out for us?
--
You
20 matches
Mail list logo
