On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 17:31 UTC, Ryan Malayter wrote:
> There is still no published RFC for NTPv4.
That's true, but it will not be true for much longer:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C76
I encourage you to click on the underlined AUTH48 links. All authors
of the four pending
David J Taylor wrote:
Early versions of W32time (up to XP, but I'm not 100% sure) just stepped
the clock, with a default update interval of 8 days. Over a week!
Later versions (Server 2003 and later, I believe) had more NTP-like
behaviour, but did not conform to the management protocols of N
"unruh" wrote in message
news:slrni1mjri.fnp.un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca...
> On 2010-06-17, Marcelo Pimenta wrote:
>> [...] What's your SO?
> Define SO.
Operating System in Italian.
Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink
___
questions mailing list
questions
David J Taylor wrote:
"Ryan Malayter" wrote in message
news:aanlktimovwejjo8twxa2xwgep4dhebgalgqv1vnhi...@mail.gmail.com...
[]
The fact that niether the reference implementation nor w32time have
direct support for SNMP, a *far* more widely used and documented
managment standard, would seem to
"Richard B. Gilbert" wrote in message
news:roadnwsbv-fooybrnz2dnuvz_oodn...@giganews.com...
[]
The difference is not significant unless you can somehow take advantage
of the greater accuracy!
Of course.
The difference in price between the Motorola device whose specifications
I was citing an
"Ryan Malayter" wrote in message
news:aanlktimovwejjo8twxa2xwgep4dhebgalgqv1vnhi...@mail.gmail.com...
[]
The fact that niether the reference implementation nor w32time have
direct support for SNMP, a *far* more widely used and documented
managment standard, would seem to be another way to look
unruh wrote:
> NO idea what this means. SNTP uses the ntp ehternet protocol Ie, the
I presume that "ethernet" in there is a slip of the keyboard. Being
pedantic, NTP protocol messages are carried in UDP datagrams which are
carried in IPv4 datagrams (with IPv6 to be named later :) which are
then
David J Taylor wrote:
"Richard B. Gilbert" wrote in message
news:fcgdnxzbxfvy7ifrnz2dnuvz_sadn...@giganews.com...
[]
If you have a GPS timing receiver (different from navigation
receiver), with a PPS output, one edge of that pulse should be
accurate to within 50 nanoseconds. A serial output
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:47 AM, David J Taylor
wrote:
> In practice, in a mixed environment, where other implementations of NTP do
> conform to an accepted management standard,
> having the Microsoft Windows
> W32time not conform to the same standard is, at the very least, an
> operational incon
"Ryan Malayter" wrote in message
news:aanlktik-l6s7b-xectebamftt8v3y3-9duwyckt4i...@mail.gmail.com...
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:34 AM, David J Taylor
wrote:
Later
versions (Server 2003 and later, I believe) had more NTP-like
behaviour, but
did not conform to the management protocols of NTP (
Hi,
Thanks for those suggestion, I will try those next week and will share
my results. I was also wondering if instead of using the generic pps
driver and the clock driver, I could include the pps code into the clock
driver making it a one driver show or if this would just hide the
problem an
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:34 AM, David J Taylor
wrote:
> Later
> versions (Server 2003 and later, I believe) had more NTP-like behaviour, but
> did not conform to the management protocols of NTP (so you can't check the
> offset), didn't use ntp.conf, couldn't be used as ref-clocks, and likely
> d
Mr Dave Baxter wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> As people on here seem to know about all this, a question if I may.
>
> This came up while in discussion with another party, in regards to
> potential "steps" in time caused by allowing w32time to do the job,
> instead of a custom app, or "feature" in yet anot
On 2010-06-17, Marcelo Pimenta wrote:
> 2010/6/16 David Woolley
>
>> Marcelo Pimenta wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Rob, my understading about the use of SNTP and NTP is: while SNTP provides
>>> time synchronization within *one *network, NTP allows a global time
>>>
>>
>> You are confusing it with timed. SNTP
On 2010-06-17, Marcelo Pimenta wrote:
> 2010/6/17 unruh
>
>> On 2010-06-16, Marcelo Pimenta wrote:
>> > 2010/6/15 unruh
>> >
>> >> On 2010-06-14, Marcelo Pimenta wrote:
>> >> > Hi everybody!!
>> >> >
>> >> > My question is about Time Accuracy of NTP/SNTP protocol. I want to
>> know
>> >> if
>>
"Mr Dave Baxter" wrote in message
news:mpg.26854e5ff4b4b56a989...@aioe.org...
Hi All.
As people on here seem to know about all this, a question if I may.
This came up while in discussion with another party, in regards to
potential "steps" in time caused by allowing w32time to do the job,
inste
Hi All.
As people on here seem to know about all this, a question if I may.
This came up while in discussion with another party, in regards to
potential "steps" in time caused by allowing w32time to do the job,
instead of a custom app, or "feature" in yet another program.
What I'd like to ask,
Hi Marc,
perhaps I've overseen the obvious: Try what happens if you make the PPS
clock sample the other edge of the pulse signal.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
On 06/15/2010 04:46 PM, Marc Leclerc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So it seem that after a while NTP reject my GPS and PPS input for time
> keeping. The only source for time sync is the GPS, I cannot use other
> devices and/or remote servers.
>
Hi Marc,
I have/had similar problems with a Garmin GPS18x and the
Simple hack to get $1500 to your home at http://easywayformoney.co.cc
Due to high security risks,i have hidden the cheque link in an
image. in that website on left side below search box, click on image
and enter your name and address where you want to receive your
cheque.please dont tell to anyon
20 matches
Mail list logo
