On 2017-03-21 08:05, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Miroslav Lichvar writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:01:21PM +, Ra=FAl wrote:
>>> But I don't need anything special, I'm just looking how to know
>>> the load of my NTP server, how many request I'm receiving from
>>> clients. I thought that doing
On 2017-03-21 05:44, Charles Elliott wrote:
> Will you please go to http://bugs.ntp.org/enter_bug.cgi and file a
> bug report saying that the ntpq mrulist command is not working for
> you, if that is the case as you allege. In the alternative, please go
> to the same Web page
4.2.6 should have a similar command via ntpdc.
And in 4.2.8 (at least) , iostats is available in ntpq.
H
--
Miroslav Lichvar writes:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:01:21PM +, Ra=FAl wrote:
> > But I don't need anything special, I'm just looking how to know the load =
> of
> > my NTP server,
Thank you very much, Miroslav.
On 21 March 2017 at 12:43, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:30:01PM +, Raúl wrote:
> > So, using "ntpdc -c iostats", the numbers under the labels "received
> > packets" and "packets sent" are the total number of
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:30:01PM +, Raúl wrote:
> So, using "ntpdc -c iostats", the numbers under the labels "received
> packets" and "packets sent" are the total number of requests
> received/served since the last server reboot?
Yes, except the numbers include all received and transmitted
Hello Miroslav,
Of course, I'm not interested in individual clients, just the total number
of requests in, f.e., one hour. Maybe I did not explain myself correctly in
my previous messages.
So, using "ntpdc -c iostats", the numbers under the labels "received
packets" and "packets sent" are the
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:01:21PM +, Raúl wrote:
> But I don't need anything special, I'm just looking how to know the load of
> my NTP server, how many request I'm receiving from clients. I thought that
> doing that would be easy.
If you just need current rate of requests and don't care
Hello Charles,
I think that my problem with mrulist is not a bug. As Mike Cook sais in a
previous message, mrulist was added to NTP in the 4.2.7 version and I'm
using 4.2.6 (CentOS default one).
> In the alternative, please go to the same Web page (
http://bugs.ntp.org/enter_bug.cgi) and file a
Will you please go to http://bugs.ntp.org/enter_bug.cgi and file a bug report
saying that the ntpq mrulist command is not working for you, if that is the
case as you allege. In the alternative, please go to the same Web page
(http://bugs.ntp.org/enter_bug.cgi) and file a request for
Hello Mike,
CentOS is very conservative with versions. CentOS has the same backporting
practice that RHEL (https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting)
and ntp, f.e., is patched in CentOS when a security problem occurs, but the
core it's not updated.
I have to learn how to install the
Hi Mike,
I'm using the ntpd version 4.2.6p5, the default one with CentOS 7.
I have to investigate how to update ntpd to last available version.
Thanks for your help,
Regards.
Raúl.
On 20 March 2017 at 23:12, Mike Cook wrote:
> Hi Raul,
>If the mrulist command is
Hello Mauricio,
Bing Translator was the culprit.
Thanks.
On 20 March 2017 at 10:23, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:10 AM, David Woolley
> wrote:
> > On 08/03/17 10:53, Micron wrote:
> >>
> >> Recently, I've added my
Hello Elliot,
I think number 5 it's the correct one.
Thanks for your help.
On 8 March 2017 at 11:41, Charles Elliott wrote:
> I don't understand what you mean by the word "petition."
>
> Petition:
>
> 1. A formally drawn request, often bearing the names of a number
Hello Mike,
Thanks for your answer.
This is my first time using a mailing list (my first question was done via
Google Groups) and I I hope to be doing it the right way.
My fault, maybe "*petitions*" was not the right word, "*request*" is the
right one. My english level is not good and in
14 matches
Mail list logo