's,
claiming that I contacted them.
On topic, something like this perhaps?
http://www.sput.nl/ntpstats/
Uses bash, grep, awk and rrdtool.
Regards,
Rob
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
is TAI (atomic time) + leap seconds.
Regards,
Rob
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
catherine.wei1...@gmail.com catherine.wei1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 5:27:12 PM UTC+8, Rob wrote:
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
catherine.wei1...@gmail.com writes:
When I start the ntpd process and disabled ntpd authentication using
command:
ntpd -a -g -n -c
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
catherine.wei1...@gmail.com writes:
When I start the ntpd process and disabled ntpd authentication using command:
ntpd -a -g -n -c /etc/ntp.conf -l /tmp/ntp.log
and then execute the command (eg):
ntpq -c :config server 10.172.161.16 minpoll 3 maxpoll 4
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:48:46PM +, Rob wrote:
I am still finding out what sensor is best to use, we do have a room
temperature sensor that has .1C resolution
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 20 Feb 2015 19:29:44 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Why not just:
pool pool.ntp.org
That should be enough.
I did have just one line pool uk.pool.ntp.org but the rogue
Did I write pool uk.pool.ntp.org? I don't think so...
No, you didn't. Did I
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +, Rob wrote:
We have systems in places that are not temperature controlled and then
chrony is much better. I am looking
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 07:54:50 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It looks like you have created your own problem.
What problem are you talking about?
Your problem to get enough good servers.
___
questions mailing list
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 10:52:40 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 07:54:50 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It looks like you have created your own problem.
What problem are you talking about?
Your problem
Brian Inglis brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-21 01:00, Rob wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +, Rob wrote:
We have systems in places
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
What are you using? Are you on ntpd or chrony?
Please do not followup to my postings when you don't care to follow
the thread!
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/90.155.73.34
How does one alert an operator that their server is sick?
Checking back through my peerstats I see that last entry
which was okay was 2015-02-16 15:08:56.
There is no need. The pool system has sent a mail
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:45:54 +, Roger
invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
After about 11 minutes it has dropped one, leaving 6 servers.
I'll continue to monitor and report back.
Just to recap, I now have this in my ntp.conf:
pool 0.uk.pool.ntp.org
pool
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
In the specific case of PPS I don't see any advantage.
Well, no. Lichvar did some tests with PPS and found that chrony
disciplined the clock much better than did ntpd (factors of over 10). I
think that is a difference.
I am seeing the same thing on our
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
My update to that after the years would be that 3x is not really the
minimum difference. If the clock is stable enough, they can perform
similarly.
Indeed when a system is in a reasonably constant temperature and the
clock happens to be good, ntpd
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +, Rob wrote:
We have systems in places that are not temperature controlled and then
chrony is much better. I am looking for the best way to find the
values to use in the tempcomp configuration directive
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 02:42:39PM +, Rob wrote:
Ok but of course we are using PPS and a 16 second polling interval.
(or maybe the PPS refclock polls even faster although it displays 4 as
the poll interval indicator)
You may want to try
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:48:46PM +, Rob wrote:
I am still finding out what sensor is best to use, we do have a room
temperature sensor that has .1C resolution and is readable via snmp,
and there are the usual sensors for board- and inlet air
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
As I said I have six machines, one of which is at home over an cable
modem line, all getting their time from chrony on a server. No trouble
whatsoever, and I have never had any. This suggests that there is
something else going on. Now, I do not have the
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 15/02/15 22:40, Rob wrote:
it is tracking very nicely
Tracking what?
The PPS signal.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +, Rob wrote:
Is chronyc of 1.31 compatible with chronyd 2.0?
Yes, old configuration should still work. But you can use
acquisitionport 123 as a workaround if you prefer stable version.
Well I tried
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 03:30:52PM +, Rob wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 02:00:30PM +, Rob wrote:
Is chronyc of 1.31 compatible with chronyd 2.0?
Yes, old configuration should still work
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:29:31AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:59:27AM +, Rob wrote:
I have strace'd the daemon and I see that it does receive the datagram
from the socket, but it does not send a reply.
Hm
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:59:27AM +, Rob wrote:
I have strace'd the daemon and I see that it does receive the datagram
from the socket, but it does not send a reply.
Hm, interesting. Can you post what follows that recvmsg() call?
I can not do
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-15, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
I am experimenting with chrony 1.31 as an alternative on some PPS
synchronized servers. It appears to run OK, it is tracking very nicely:
Reference ID: 80.80.83.48 (PPS0)
Stratum : 1
Ref time
David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 15/02/2015 22:40, Rob wrote:
I am experimenting with chrony 1.31 as an alternative on some PPS
synchronized servers. It appears to run OK, it is tracking very nicely:
[]
For me, there are two show-stoppers with Chrony
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 10:40:11PM +, Rob wrote:
However, it does not reply to NTP requests from other systems with ntpd.
(I can confirm that in a network trace)
Is there a magic command that has to be in the config to make it work
as a server
I have strace'd the daemon and I see that it does receive the datagram
from the socket, but it does not send a reply.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
I am experimenting with chrony 1.31 as an alternative on some PPS
synchronized servers. It appears to run OK, it is tracking very nicely:
Reference ID: 80.80.83.48 (PPS0)
Stratum : 1
Ref time (UTC) : Sun Feb 15 22:34:01 2015
System time : 0.00076 seconds fast of NTP time
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Feb 12, 2015, at 1:56 AM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
However, what I observe is that the plots of the offset show the derivative
of the environment temperature, which unfortunately cannot be controlled
any better. I am
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
No, that is a hardware solution. There are software solutions-- a
termistor to meaure the temperature of the crystal ( or somethign
nearby) which feeds that measurement to the OS. the revised ntp then
reads the temperature, and corrects the drift rate as a
David Lord sn...@lordynet.org wrote:
Rob wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Feb 12, 2015, at 1:56 AM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
However, what I observe is that the plots of the offset show the
derivative
of the environment temperature, which
catherine.wei1...@gmail.com catherine.wei1...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,I just tested it and found that the synchronization of NTP is really slow.
That is because ntpd is not designed to correct arbitrary errors that
you have applied externally. It is designed to lock to the correct time
and stay
Charles Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2015, at 7:23 AM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
But I see it has also been explained elsewhere in the thread: ntpd has
a maximum on the momentary drift of 500ppm, no matter if it is static
or dynamic or the sum of two. I think
David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 12/02/2015 17:00, William Unruh wrote:
[]
This means that if you are using say a PPS source, which gives
microsecond long term offset, it can take many hours to get there, even
if you or I looking at the offsets could see that it is
Charles Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
However, what I observe is that the plots of the offset show the derivative
of the environment temperature, which unfortunately cannot be controlled
any better. I am considering to locate the crystal that is responsible
for the timing and see if it could
Brian Inglis brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-12 03:00, Rob wrote:
catherine.wei1...@gmail.com catherine.wei1...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,I just tested it and found that the synchronization of NTP is really
slow.
That is because ntpd is not designed to correct arbitrary errors
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-12, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Brian Inglis brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-12 03:00, Rob wrote:
catherine.wei1...@gmail.com catherine.wei1...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes,I just tested it and found that the synchronization of NTP
Jochen Bern jochen.b...@linworks.de wrote:
However, I've also seen hardware occasionally flip-flopping from -900 to
+1100 and back, complete with the developers of the firmware blaming a
bug in ntpd for failure to discipline *that*.
Ok that is different, it is not a static drift.
But I see it
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
The 500 ppm limit is not at all arbitrary!
In fact, it was originally just 100 ppm, but when too many systems
turned up with a system clock which was a bit too far out, Prof Mills
redid the control loop to allow a 500 ppm range.
It could have
catherine.wei1...@gmail.com catherine.wei1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm using the ntpd to sync time. When I change the current date for
exampe to 0210020215 (2015-02-10 02:02), the actually current time is
2015-02-10 03:02, then I run ntpq -p for several times, the offset doesn't
change at
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-07, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
walter.preunin...@gmail.com walter.preunin...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so these questions might be off the wall.
Is there any reason why I could not share the PPS output of say, my u-blox
7 GPS module on multiple
walter.preunin...@gmail.com walter.preunin...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so these questions might be off the wall.
Is there any reason why I could not share the PPS output of say, my u-blox 7
GPS module on multiple computers? Would it be good or bad to peer these 2
systems with each other?
We do
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-07, David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 07/02/15 08:24, Rob wrote:
And a side question: Is it the GPS module that calculates when the PPS
goes active? Is this signal compensated for the time it takes the signal
from
Andreas Mattheiss please.post@publicly.invalid wrote:
Hi,
Am Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:01:43 + schrieb Rob:
Note than an RS232 port usually works fine with just the 0 and +3..5v
levels so you can directly connect the output to the RS232 line without
MAX232.
Nice try, but in my case
Andreas Mattheiss please.post@publicly.invalid wrote:
Hello,
Am Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:24:05 + schrieb Rob:
No, it is the wrong way around. Your signal should be -3 most of the
time, and pulse to +3 during the 100/200ms pulses.
aaah - thanks for this. I'll see if i have a transistor
Andreas Mattheiss please.post@publicly.invalid wrote:
Hi,
ok, let's go all technical ;-)
I wanted to play around a bit, building a reference clock from a cheap
DCF77 module (similar, but not identical to the infameous Conrad
module). It basically churns out 100/200ms pulses. I was planning
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Rob writes:
Sander Smeenk ssme...@freshdot.net wrote:
What is actually wrong with running ntpdate to initially sync a
clock? Why is the ntpdate.exe binary provided when 'we' shouldnt use
it? Keep in mind that i 'just want to get to seconds accuracy'
before
Sander Smeenk ssme...@freshdot.net wrote:
Quoting Terje Mathisen (terje.mathi...@tmsw.no):
a) You should not run ntpdate, instead you use the -q option to ntpd to
handle any initial time steps.
What is actually wrong with running ntpdate to initially sync a clock?
Why is the ntpdate.exe
George Ross g...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
--===2288611982837908707==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary===_Exmh_1421754685_7720P;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--==_Exmh_1421754685_7720P
Content-Type: text/plain;
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-01-20, George Ross g...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
--===2288611982837908707==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary===_Exmh_1421754685_7720P;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
George Ross g...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
--===6692172896629376392==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary===_Exmh_1421765608_7720P;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--==_Exmh_1421765608_7720P
Content-Type: text/plain;
George Ross g...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
--===2115662771273679884==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary===_Exmh_1421661606_7734P;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--==_Exmh_1421661606_7734P
Content-Type: text/plain;
George Ross g...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
--===8412338610136231777==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary===_Exmh_1421654265_8133P;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--==_Exmh_1421654265_8133P
Content-Type: text/plain;
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-01-19, fm@fr.invalid fm@fr.invalid wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-01-19, Mike S mi...@flatsurface.com wrote:
On 1/18/2015 6:04 PM, William Unruh wrote:
UTC always has 86400 seconds per year.
You clearly don't understand
Oceanos Admin sysad...@cellmail.com wrote:
Is there anyone with the prior experience in getting these older Trimble
units
to work? Most of the information dates back to the early 2000's or so.
Our desire is to get away from using an external Internet based public NTP
site
to limit
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no
wrote:
Not in my msg, but in the subject of the entire thread. :-)
I'm so used to nomail@example being wrong I had a knee-jerk reaction. My
bad.
You just can't stand being pointed at
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
By the way, you can't send mail to nom...@example.com. I'm sure being
somewhat anonymous enables statements like Harlan has decided to keep us
in the dark and feed us shit..
That was VERY TRUE on that topic!!
He did not tell us what was wrong and he grossly
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
http://linuxgizmos.com/tiny-fanless-mini-pc-runs-linux-on-quad-core-amd-soc/
This little guy starts at $129 and includes a serial port which should
make it trivial to attach a Sure GPS board.
With a dual or quad 64-bit CPU, both SATA and SD
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
it would seem to
be a nice NTPD startum 1 server.
Of course, it could still be good enough when you want to use it as a
network time server
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It was suggested as a high-perf NTP server
That string is not in the message. It's not a quote despite your quotation
marks.
It's in the subject, idiot
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
That is a translation from seconds to ymdhms. The problem is not there.
it is in the UTC seconds.
In UTC one second disappears after the leap second, but not before or
during. Thus UTC seconds numbering is simply disconinuous (jumps back) .
And it is that
Mike S mi...@flatsurface.com wrote:
On 1/11/2015 7:16 PM, William Unruh wrote:
If that public source is responsible it will pass on to your
system the fact that there is a leapsecond, and your system will stop
for a second at the last second of June.
A system which properly implements leap
brian utterback brian.utterb...@oracle.com wrote:
On 1/11/2015 4:56 PM, Rob wrote:
Michael Moroney moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com wrote:
If I have a system synchronized with a public NTP source, which is
synchronized with an atomic clock that provides leap second info, and
I am watching
Michael Moroney moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com wrote:
Rob nom...@example.com writes:
Michael Moroney moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com wrote:
If I have a system synchronized with a public NTP source, which is
synchronized with an atomic clock that provides leap second info, and
I am watching
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
Rob schrieb:
Mike S mi...@flatsurface.com wrote:
On 1/11/2015 7:16 PM, William Unruh wrote:
If that public source is responsible it will pass on to your
system the fact that there is a leapsecond, and your system will stop
for a second
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
So, there are a bunch of proposals. stop the clock a la Mills
(delivering times that always increase but very very slowly during that
second).
double the rate of the clock during the two seconds around the leap.
Have the clock run in TAI and put the
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-01-10, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem?
Hello William,
1. The installer
Michael Moroney moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com wrote:
If I have a system synchronized with a public NTP source, which is
synchronized with an atomic clock that provides leap second info, and
I am watching carefully, what will happen when the leap second hits? Will
my system suddenly find
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-01-09, trackeroft...@gmail.com trackeroft...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean It is branded? And why is that a problem?
Hello William,
1. The installer is branded:
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/setup.html
I still have no idea what you are
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Martin Burnicki writes:
Rob wrote:
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
And of course, the information flow was really bad here, so that it is
very hard to figure out which systems are affected.
Indeed. Only after 3 days
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 21/12/14 20:10, Rob wrote:
What I got from the documentation is that without nopeer a server
could setup a peer association. I don't like that.
No. Without nopeer, a *client* can't set up a peer session. If you are
using a system
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
Rob schrieb:
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 21/12/14 10:48, Rob wrote:
People say disable crypto but there is no clear direction in the docs
on how to do that. There is no crypto off or disable crypto config
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
I don't want DHCP to modify my NTP settings, or to restart ntpd.
(of course the neat thing about the above solution is that it is not
required to restart ntpd. in Debian, for example, ntpd is restarted when
a DHCP lease with changed ntp
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 20/12/14 22:01, Rob wrote:
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 20/12/14 19:58, William Unruh wrote:
Is it an ntp packet (ie a time exchange packet)? is it a control packet
(eg ntpq type packet?) or what?
Ie, unless you
David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
I just added some experimental restrict statements to one on my servers:
restrict default notrap nomodify nopeer noquery
restrict default notrap nomodify nopeer noquery
restrict 127.0.0.1
restrict ::1
restrict
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 21/12/14 10:48, Rob wrote:
People say disable crypto but there is no clear direction in the docs
on how to do that. There is no crypto off or disable crypto config
directive at first glance. So how is this done?
I would assume
Terje Mathisen terje.mathi...@tmsw.no wrote:
Rob wrote:
David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
I just added some experimental restrict statements to one on my servers:
restrict default notrap nomodify nopeer noquery
restrict default notrap nomodify nopeer noquery
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 21/12/14 11:24, Rob wrote:
Anyway, I consider it a bug. I don't want to lift restrictions to
arbitrary systems selected from a pool. So, out went the pool command.
Why do you want to specify pool servers if you want to restrict
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
Paranoia? Security alerts are generally not that explicit (and this one
is actually unusually explicit) because they provide information to the
hackers.
That is usually obtained anyway be reverse-engineering the fix.
In this case that is
David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 21/12/2014 11:17, Terje Mathisen wrote:
[]
'restrict source' is the proper way to do it, as long as you have a
version which supports that command.
Terje
Thanks, Rob Terje, that did the job. Almost!
The except was that if you
Jochen Bern jochen.b...@linworks.de wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, 0.66 * -9295 is enough for me to grab the
backports from the repos for our outward-serving ntpds right now ...
Yes, for most systems I did the same, but I have the development version
of ntpd running on a couple of systems, and
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
That means I don't accept that anyone outside does something that may
modify my server (including setting up a peer relationship).
If you actually think the software is so badly designed
A C agcarver+...@acarver.net wrote:
I saw the advisory about the potential issues in ntpd before 4.2.8 but I
don't quite understand whether it affects a pure client (not serving
time to the outside) or not.
If the issue does affect client-only operation, what can be done for
systems that
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 20/12/14 19:58, William Unruh wrote:
Is it an ntp packet (ie a time exchange packet)? is it a control packet
(eg ntpq type packet?) or what?
Ie, unless you use crypto, these two look like they might be dangerous.
Both routines only
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Rob writes:
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Rob writes:
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Paul writes:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Martin Burnicki
martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
OK, but what is the problem in using these IOCTLs
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
Without having looked at the code base, I'm sure there are already
predefined macros available for the current build target/architecture.
So it should not be a problem to include something like
#if defined( SOLARIS )
#include
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
The main problem is that the underlying system time (often POSIX, which
just counts seconds since an epoch) has the *same* time stamp art the
beginning and end of the leap second.
In order to do the conversion correctly you need to know if
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
Imagine you set up an event for April 2015 today, but you just don't
know if DST will be in effect at that time, or not, just because the
politicians haven't made the decision today. How will you handle this?
It may not be helpful if you
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
Unfortunately, the same mechanism isn't used for leap seconds.
There would be no problem at all when the system time ticked in TAI
and the addition of the leap seconds is done via some rule table similar
to the local time rules. ntpd would
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
IMO the GPS system designers have made quite a number of wise decisions,
e.g. letting the GPS time simply increase monotonically, which is, from
a technical/usage point of view, similar to TAI.
That decision was wise. The decision to
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Paul writes:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Martin Burnicki
martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
OK, but what is the problem in using these IOCTLs directly from within
ntpd, via wrapper functions or directly? Several refclock drivers do so.
You'll
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Rob writes:
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Paul writes:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Martin Burnicki
martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
OK, but what is the problem in using these IOCTLs directly from within
ntpd, via wrapper functions
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
Rob wrote:
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
IMO the GPS system designers have made quite a number of wise decisions,
e.g. letting the GPS time simply increase monotonically, which is, from
a technical/usage point of view
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 05:43:59AM +, Harlan Stenn wrote:
d_anderson writes:
Thanks! I quickly skimmed through the document, and I think I am
asking the wrong questions..
I've been trying to think of good reasons to authenticate pool servers
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Rob writes:
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
You know what? On the ntp-dev package for Debian THE BUILD DEPENDENCIES
ARE INCORRECT AS WELL!!
This is an example of what NTF doesn't want to deal
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
Mageia 3 capability.h is also in /usr/include/linux and timepps.h does
not exist. (not does a ppstools package)
The package is named pps-tools not ppstools.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2014-12-15, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
Mageia 3 capability.h is also in /usr/include/linux and timepps.h does
not exist. (not does a ppstools package)
The package is named pps-tools not ppstools.
It also does
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Rob writes:
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Paul writes:
--001a11c12566ef4fbd050a04ed7c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Dec 12, 2014 12:39 AM, Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
It's an OS-specific file that should be provided
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
You know what? On the ntp-dev package for Debian THE BUILD DEPENDENCIES
ARE INCORRECT AS WELL!!
This is an example of what NTF doesn't want to deal with. My instance of
Wheezy doesn't have ntp
1 - 100 of 858 matches
Mail list logo
