Re: [ntp:questions] More Granularity in the US in the NTP Pool

2007-09-11 Thread Brian Utterback
ant is to keep the heads you have got, and throw away the tails and throw them again. That way in only 2 or 3 throws you get the 8 heads you want. What Henk has described is just the first step in a facility that I have been thinking about for quite some time. The idea is to allow a much more extensive level of self-organizing emergent NTP behavior. But the ability of get this type of incremental behavior is crucial to getting it to work. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] More Granularity in the US in the NTP Pool

2007-09-11 Thread Brian Utterback
; even just a cron job. > > -- blu Screening ideas are indeed thought up by the Office for Annoying Air Travelers and vetted through the Directorate for Confusion and Complexity - Kip Hawley, Head of the TSA ------ Brian Ut

Re: [ntp:questions] More Granularity in the US in the NTP Pool

2007-09-12 Thread Brian Utterback
agged as keepers get booted off before the new guys have proved themselves. Brian Utterback Jason Rabel wrote: > I don't think that it would have to conflict with the function of NTP. Just > keep the chosen time source and any secondary sources, dump the rest and > re-query adding th

Re: [ntp:questions] More Granularity in the US in the NTP Pool

2007-09-12 Thread Brian Utterback
> Say +3 for a *, +1 for a +, and -1 for a -. > The current NTP daemon already has code to rank the servers. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] More Granularity in the US in the NTP Pool

2007-09-14 Thread Brian Utterback
Danny Mayer wrote: > Brian Utterback wrote: > >> Unfortunately, neither poolcasting nor preempt does what is being >> requested, at least I know that preempt does not and poolcasting >> doesn't if I understand it correctly. The problem with preempt (at >>

Re: [ntp:questions] Server and Client can't sync

2007-10-30 Thread Brian Utterback
you could get this, but you implied that ntpd wasn't run until after the clock change. True? If that is true, that would seem to indicate that two different clocks are being used. Does VxWorks use the SO_TIMESTAMP socket option to get the timestamp of the inco

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpdate off by one hour in older redhat server

2007-10-30 Thread Brian Utterback
previous years, I will go out on a limb here and suggest that the time zone files on your systems are out of date and have not been updated. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] TimeStamp

2007-10-31 Thread Brian Utterback
mestamp". This value is the raw seconds and microseconds before the correction to 1970. If this value is near zero or rather near the uptime in seconds, then I think that would amount to a smoking gun. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpq -p "when"

2007-11-12 Thread Brian Utterback
riod of time of non-response, the polling data for an association is cleared. When that happens, the REFTIME for the association is used instead. And the REFTIME can be very nearly the same as the last REC time, or it could be wildly different.

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-04 Thread Brian Utterback
e that discussion going anywhere in this regard. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-06 Thread Brian Utterback
n receiving the > response. This is a property of all RPC protocols known to me that use > addresses to match requests with responses. This is so obvious a > requirement that maybe the specification doesn't make it clear enough. > > Dave > > Brian Utterback wrote: >>

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-06 Thread Brian Utterback
IP > address. No reply is ever required of a datagram. It would be a protocol > layering violation to do so. The NTP protocol requirement is proper in > this context. > > Danny > > Brian Utterback wrote: >> I beg to differ. Most UDP based protocols do not have this requirem

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-06 Thread Brian Utterback
P. -- blu "You've added a new disk. Do you want to replace your current drive, protect your data from a drive failure or expand your storage capacity?" - Disk management as it should be. ------ Brian Utterback - Solar

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-10 Thread Brian Utterback
Danny Mayer wrote: > Brian Utterback wrote: > >> Perhaps proper, but ill-advised. Look at the trouble we have >> had trying to satisfy that requirement. I am sitting at a >> system that currently has over 300 UDP ports in use. Exactly >> one of those UDP ports is b

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-10 Thread Brian Utterback
tty silly for a RPC server not to > know how to return the goods to its client. Maybe you are talking about > the socket interface, rather than the protocol data unit. I wasn't. > > Dave > > Brian Utterback wrote: > >> I beg to differ. Most UDP based protocols do

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-13 Thread Brian Utterback
e capacity?" - Disk management as it should be. ------ Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Sun Microsystems, Inc. Ph:877-259-7345, Em:brian.utterback-at-ess-you-enn-dot-kom ___ questions mailing list questions@l

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-14 Thread Brian Utterback
ULD was necessary. But even so, my point is that although ther SHOULD is there, most UDP applications on most operating systems do not actually follow the SHOULD at all. Brian Utterback. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-14 Thread Brian Utterback
mber of different processes. All of them bound to the wildcard address except NTP. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-14 Thread Brian Utterback
ckets API would have had a way to do it easily and then I would not object at all. > > Hyde Park in London on Sunday Morning... If you are saying that you are going, then have a good trip. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-21 Thread Brian Utterback
nd all the local IP addresses. -- blu "Mr. Jefferson, build up that wall!" -- Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Sun Microsystems, Inc. Ph:877-259-7345, Em:brian.utterback-at-ess-you-enn-dot-kom

Re: [ntp:questions] Source address in response always the same as target address in request?

2007-12-21 Thread Brian Utterback
zations required to change it (one for forward lookups and one for reverse lookups). Once the DNS is changed, it takes some time to propagate the change due to caching, and already running applications may never see the change unless they re-resolve. Having one service per IP address also makes the

Re: [ntp:questions] Bizzare half second disagreement between ntp hosts

2008-01-02 Thread Brian Utterback
ion of "nearest" is the one for which the offset is less than .5 seconds, either in the future or the past. So, at some particular threshold of phase offset, the clock offset determined by the PPS will switch sign, and jump from .5 to -.5 or vice versa. Brian utterback __

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP vs chrony comparison (Was: oscillations in ntp clock synchronization)

2008-01-23 Thread Brian Utterback
don't know about the version of ntp you are running, but recent versions have a bug in the initial frequency calculations which has since been fixed, but not released (ahem. Harlan?). Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP vs chrony comparison (Was: oscillations in ntp clock synchronization)

2008-01-24 Thread Brian Utterback
k. If your goal is to keep the offset as low as possible, just keep the poll interval as short as possible. That doesn't take much work. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.

2008-01-25 Thread Brian Utterback
ince the error in the sample is correlated to the size of the delay, using samples with greater delay and thus greater error just increases the error of the final result, not lessens it. Since the clocks involved also slew between samples, we want to use the newest sam

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP vs chrony comparison (Was: oscillations in ntp clock synchronization)

2008-01-25 Thread Brian Utterback
alas, my changes didn't make it in the latest versions. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] comparing 2 NTP implementations

2008-01-27 Thread brian . utterback
sity of Deleware. But unless you know what you are trying to achieve, you will not know if you have got it. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP vs chrony comparison (Was: oscillations in ntp clock synchronization)

2008-01-27 Thread brian . utterback
him with A Priori reasoning, since he has been doing that same reasoning for a lot longer than the rest of us, and has tested all his hypotheses on real systems. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.

2008-01-28 Thread Brian Utterback
lan, especially with a low > propagation delay of hundreds of usec rather then 100s of msec, I wonder. > The calculation of the offset is not affected at all by the time between taking the two timestamps on the remote machine. In fact, on symmetric peers, this time could be in the thousands of

Re: [ntp:questions] very slow convergence of ntp to correct time.

2008-01-28 Thread Brian Utterback
oblem many years ago and suggested using burst at that time, but thought that it would be overkill and asked for a way to tune it to a fewer number of packets in the burst. Dave was reticent and I was newer to the project then and didn't want to push it. Perhaps it is time. Brian Utterback _

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP vs chrony comparison (Was: oscillations in ntp clock synchronization)

2008-01-28 Thread Brian Utterback
erver in a way that you could implement, it just gives specs on a good client and says implement that if you only want a client, and implement the whole package if you want a server. -- blu "Mr. Jefferson, build up that wall!" ----

Re: [ntp:questions] strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.

2008-01-29 Thread Brian Utterback
like huge jumps and filter them. A 4ms increase is just what you would expect when ethernet timers kick in. Now imagine a RTT of 60-70ms. A 9ms delay from a collision introduces a 4ms change in the delay value and a 2ms change in the offset, but with a delay might not perturb the delay value eno

Re: [ntp:questions] strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.

2008-01-30 Thread Brian Utterback
> Based on general principles, the stated conditions are NOT where I would > look first for best performance. > Which is why NTP prefers the source with the smallest delay. The system I am using has servers whose delays are 51ms to 94. I can't find any closer. On my company LAN, the

Re: [ntp:questions] strange behaviour of ntp peerstats entries.

2008-01-30 Thread Brian Utterback
David J Taylor wrote: > Brian Utterback wrote: > [] >> Which is why NTP prefers the source with the smallest delay. The >> system I am using has servers whose delays are 51ms to 94. I can't >> find any closer. On my company LAN, the delays range from 16ms to >

Re: [ntp:questions] xntpd fails aix 5.3

2008-02-06 Thread Brian Utterback
jen wrote: > Hi Harlan, I agree. Darned out of date code anyway! > How do you know? Maybe you just have an 11 year clock offset! Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Under which circumstances a reply comes 126 seconds later?

2008-03-05 Thread Brian Utterback
could be prempting ntp? > > Danny Not strictly true. The response packet for a symmetric association can come back an arbitrarily long time after the request was sent. The ntpd program does not immediately respond to symmetric packets, instead waiting until the peer polling interv

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP does not reply to IP addresses that start with 69

2008-04-02 Thread Brian Utterback
he 69.*.*.* network? If so, do they have anything else in common? Different? What version of NTP is running on the clients that fail? On the ones that succeed? Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/ma

Re: [ntp:questions] frequency adjusting only

2008-05-02 Thread Brian Utterback
ed by packet lengths, > buffering, retransmissions, etc., but at much longer lags you have to > look for routing flaps, provisioning changes, etc. > Dave, are you saying that you saw an instance of a NTP response arriving 2 weeks after the request was s

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP slow to start correction after a drift

2008-05-09 Thread Brian Utterback
Do you have the frequency data from the same period as the graph? What happened to cause the frequency to be off all of a sudden? Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Getting PPS on a modern rack-mounted server?

2008-06-02 Thread Brian Utterback
ould you elaborate. Which model of Netra? Are you saying that the model of Netra you are talking about has a serial port, but that serial port does not have DCD connected? Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lis

Re: [ntp:questions] question about DST

2008-06-02 Thread Brian Utterback
e files live in /usr/share/lib/zoneinfo/src. Change the rules in the asia file in that directory. You can then use the zic command to create a replacement for the /usr/share/lib/zoneinfo/Asia/Karachi file. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list que

Re: [ntp:questions] Frequency Error on Sun4v

2008-06-20 Thread Brian Utterback
blu/entry/spread_spectrum_emi_and_the for an explanation of the T5120 issue. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Frequency Error on Sun4v

2008-06-26 Thread Brian Utterback
estion, there is a tunable and you can turn the spread-spectrum off, but I do not know what it is. Sorry. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Frequency Error on Sun4v

2008-06-26 Thread Brian Utterback
ess to the one system and was not involved at all in the firmware fix. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

[ntp:questions] Kernel PLL, microkernel and the simulator.

2008-07-20 Thread brian . utterback
rstood the simulator. Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Brian Utterback brian dot utterback at sun dot com ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Time synchronization for hosts running on VMWare

2008-07-20 Thread brian . utterback
only stands to reason that the time keeping will be shaky at best. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Finding out where ntpd gets its ntp.conf file

2008-09-05 Thread Brian Utterback
Unruh wrote: > I seriously doubt that redhat would recompile ntpd and put in a different > default config file. > Why not? The Solaris version certainly does. It uses /etc/inet/ntp.conf by default. Brian Utterback ___ questions mai

Re: [ntp:questions] GPS clock for Linux

2008-09-15 Thread Brian Utterback
urs to me. Would it work to have the PPS signal go to a serial port but the actual NMEA sentences be read via USB? It seems to me if the total jitter of the USB still kept the snetences timing within half a second it would work. Brian Utterback ___

Re: [ntp:questions] Server offset included in served time?

2008-09-15 Thread Brian Utterback
t and frequency right under many typical startup conditions. Dr. Mills isn't really interested in fixing this, not because he denies it, but because he doesn't think it is the best area for his labors. He is more interested in the long-haul. Brian Utterback ___

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP installation and configuration on Solaris

2008-11-11 Thread Brian Utterback
Your best bet is to create a new NTP service in SMF. You can run "svcfg export ntp" to get the current definition. Then create a new NTP service called ntp4, and make a new SMF method called ntp, and then import it and you should be set. Melanie Pfefer wrote: > how to stop and start ntp on sola

Re: [ntp:questions] Why can't clocks do inital synchronization?

2009-01-08 Thread Brian Utterback
David J Taylor wrote: > If Solaris or HP-UX is still supplying NTP 3, I would be rather worried. > Be worried then. The latest bundled version of NTP on Solaris is xntpd 3-5.93e. Not too worried though. I hope to have V4 available in OpenSolaris soon. Brian Utt

Re: [ntp:questions] Why can't clocks do inital synchronization?

2009-01-14 Thread Brian Utterback
. For political reasons, it seems like a good time would be when 4.2.5 becomes the new stable branch. David J Taylor wrote: > Brian Utterback wrote: >> David J Taylor wrote: >> >>> If Solaris or HP-UX is still supplying NTP 3, I would be rather >>> worried. >> &g

Re: [ntp:questions] Garmin 18 LVC: whether to fudge

2009-02-11 Thread Brian Utterback
Chris Adams wrote: > The asymmetry in ADSL is in bandwidth, not path or latency. More > frequency space is used for downstream (ISP->end user) communication > than for upstream, but both travel the same path. Decreased bandwidth means increased latency. The two are related. Bri

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpd on embedded risc

2009-02-23 Thread Brian Utterback
Harlan Stenn wrote: > Assuming you have accurately relayed Dave's POV, Bill, I'd be open to seeing > if we can take Dave's policy choice and making it the default choice for a > config file knob (mechanism) that would allow folks to get faster > convergence. > > I suspect that the only way this w

Re: [ntp:questions] What exactly does "Maximum Distance Exceded" mean?

2009-03-16 Thread Brian Utterback
Joseph Gwinn wrote: > Also good to know, so I'll know better than to use the Sun compiler (not > that it's bad, but that it isn't what's been worked through with NTP). Not to worry, I make sure that the current -dev branch will always build with the Sun Studio c

[ntp:questions] NTP version 4 binaries for OpenSolaris and SXCE available for testing

2009-04-29 Thread Brian Utterback
I am pleased to announce that a set of binaries for NTP version 4.2.5 are available for testing. The compressed tar file that contains the test binaries in package format can be found at the files page of the NTP project: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ntp/files/ The tar file contains pa

Re: [ntp:questions] Query about NTP accuracy

2009-05-30 Thread Brian Utterback
David Woolley wrote: > Brian Utterback wrote: > >> >> Also, remember that with NTP, it take three servers to outvote one bad >> one, not two. That is why best practice is to have four. > > It only requires 2. The argument about having four initially is about

Re: [ntp:questions] different Ntp servers...

2009-05-30 Thread Brian Utterback
David Woolley wrote: > Hal Murray wrote: > >> >> What do they suggest that you do with 2 servers when they >> give back different answers? >> >> Maybe you could take the average? :) >> > ntpd already does that, as long as they don't disagree too much. Whilst > the stratum, and error statistics,

Re: [ntp:questions] Query about NTP accuracy

2009-05-31 Thread Brian Utterback
Hal Murray wrote: > In article <1243711613.525...@news1nwk>, > Brian Utterback writes: >> David Woolley wrote: > >>> It only requires 2. The argument about having four initially is about >>> having a clear majority even after rejecting one. >> I am

Re: [ntp:questions] Query about NTP accuracy

2009-06-02 Thread Brian Utterback
David Woolley wrote: > smithmi...@googlemail.com wrote: > >> In the case below, will server 3 be treated as a falseticker because >> its offset lies outside the dispersion interval of the other two >> servers even though there is some intersection between its dispersion >> and that of server 2. >

Re: [ntp:questions] Syncing to nearby vs. faraway servers

2009-06-16 Thread Brian Utterback
s what you want in theory. I haven't tried it in a while, but the last time I gave it a shot, I thought that it whittled down the list way too fast. YMMV. My personal vision is to have the NTP network be self-organizing and emergent. I am afraid there is a long way to go in that regar

Re: [ntp:questions] A question about the NTP delay time formula

2009-06-24 Thread Brian Utterback
When you think that there is a mistake in an RFC, it is wise to check the RFC errata list at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_list.php In the list, you will see that Dr. Mills reported this typo back in 2001. Terje Mathisen wrote: > Lei wrote: >> In RFC 2030(written by Prof. D.Mills), we have ro

Re: [ntp:questions] Solaris 8 xntpd vs ntpd?

2009-08-03 Thread Brian Utterback
t more to the point, Solaris 8 is no longer supported. It is a perfect match, an ancient OS with an ancient NTP version. Really, why are you using Solaris 8? Use OpenSolaris. It comes with NTP 4.2.5p172 already installed and fully supported. Brian Utterback ___

Re: [ntp:questions] Solaris 8 xntpd vs ntpd?

2009-08-13 Thread Brian Utterback
Ulrich Windl wrote: > Brian Utterback writes: >> Really, why are you using Solaris 8? Use OpenSolaris. It comes with NTP >> 4.2.5p172 already installed and fully supported. > > Really? I just saw Solaris 10 with ntp 3.5.93e (FAIR), but Sun tried > hard to hide the ver

Re: [ntp:questions] 500ppm - is it too small?

2009-08-19 Thread Brian Utterback
largest correction is limited to 500ppm. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] So what? (Re: 500ppm - is it too small?)

2009-08-27 Thread Brian Utterback
ery high, so getting it down to under 100ppm would help a lot. As odd as it sounds, I might be inclined to go back to having a separate start up program (like ntpdate was) to quickly set the date and drift. Having to get the date to within 64 years is another one of those odd, must be d

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpd: time reset problem

2009-09-13 Thread Brian Utterback
r NTP notices and puts it back to where it is supposed to be. This isn't an NTP issue at all, it was something external to NTP that yanked the clock. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpd: time reset problem

2009-09-14 Thread Brian Utterback
ike a transient error could cause this. It would be interesting to know what OS the OP is running. Todd Glassey wrote: > Brian Utterback wrote: >> Richard B. Gilbert wrote: >> >> > You may find this interesting. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/23/96 >>>>

Re: [ntp:questions] Strange NTP problem on AMD Geode LX cards.

2009-10-05 Thread Brian Utterback
is is bug 1044 Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Strange NTP problem on AMD Geode LX cards.

2009-10-06 Thread Brian Utterback
gulate the peak EMI, a piece of hardware can pass that would not pass if the frequency were constant and steady. It is very easy to implement. Just design your oscillator as a voltage controlled oscillator and feed a sine wave into it. Brian Utterback __

Re: [ntp:questions] Interface restrictions confusing me

2009-10-12 Thread Brian Utterback
John Hasler wrote: > Juergen Beisert wrote: >> Why is port 123 open on eth0? > > David Woolley writes: >> To allow the replies to come back in from the time servers. ntpd >> sends UDP packets with both source and destination set to 123, not >> just when talking to peers. > > With a stateful fire

Re: [ntp:questions] testing slew only mode (-x), not slewing correctly (linux sles10, ntpd v 4.1.1)

2009-10-21 Thread Brian Utterback
and stays gone. Remember, when NTP is running, nothing, nothing, nothing else should be adjusting the clock. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] testing slew only mode (-x), not slewing correctly (linux sles10, ntpd v 4.1.1)

2009-10-23 Thread Brian Utterback
d not assume that the RTC plays no role while the system is running. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] testing slew only mode (-x), not slewing correctly (linux sles10, ntpd v 4.1.1)

2009-10-23 Thread Brian Utterback
ce that might make sense to PPL hackers, but it means nothing to me. -- blu It's bad civic hygiene to build technologies that could someday be used to facilitate a police state. - Bruce Schneier ------ Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE,

Re: [ntp:questions] testing slew only mode (-x), not slewing correctly (linux sles10, ntpd v 4.1.1)

2009-10-24 Thread Brian Utterback
ather difficult to puzzle out, which lead me to file Solaris bug 4514730 "dosynctodr code has structure similar to game of fizzbin". Hope that clears it all up. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Remaining synced on an unsynchronised peer?

2009-12-01 Thread Brian Utterback
Dave Hart wrote: > distrusted by downstream ntpds. Assuming no orphan-mode > configuration, it is not clear to me if the stratum is supposed to go > the maximum and the synchronization (leap bits) to 11, or if they are > expected to remain at the last values with only the root dispersion to > ind

Re: [ntp:questions] Remaining synced on an unsynchronised peer?

2009-12-03 Thread Brian Utterback
this server as long as it is sane even if there are other better servers". Stale is not insane. Why bother with the prefer anyway? What do you think it is doing for you? Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http

Re: [ntp:questions] Regarding NTP configuration ntp.conf

2009-12-22 Thread Brian Utterback
Richard B. Gilbert wrote: > Three is not a good number of servers. If any one of the three fails > either by not responding or by serving incorrect time you are reduced to > two servers; back to the worst case. The magic numbers are four, five, > or seven, protecting you from the failure of one,

Re: [ntp:questions] Date Jumped

2010-01-20 Thread Brian Utterback
al that does not contain the falseticker that will get 3 votes with all the intervals involving the falseticker getting at most two votes. So, if you want protection from a single falseticker, you must have at least 4 servers. Brian Utterback ___ quest

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpd and database servers

2010-01-20 Thread Brian Utterback
discipline will work on a tickless kernel. However, actually figuring out how to implement it is proving rather intractable. It definitely makes my brain hurt thinking about it. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://li

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpd and database servers

2010-01-20 Thread Brian Utterback
this, then I think that while the high speed slew is ongoing, the system should refuse to serve NTP requests. I have thought about whether it would be worthwhile to have a status bit that when set meant "slewing ongoing, my timestamps are lies!" Brian Utterback ___

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP servers redundancy

2010-01-20 Thread Brian Utterback
ing on the hopping, it can go very far outside the interval. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP servers redundancy

2010-01-21 Thread Brian Utterback
unruh wrote: > > A problem with the ntpd protocol. Not so much the protocol as with the selection algorithm. But point taken. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpd and database servers

2010-01-21 Thread Brian Utterback
the changes in ntp_proto.c) but haven't had the time yet. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP servers redundancy

2010-01-21 Thread Brian Utterback
so one or the other server can dominate and which one dominates can change. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Number of servers needed to detect one falseticker?

2011-01-06 Thread Brian Utterback
clock at all. > > Is it possible to reword that section? > > Thanks, > -- blu Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding --------

Re: [ntp:questions] Number of servers needed to detect one falseticker?

2011-01-06 Thread Brian Utterback
On 01/04/11 17:07, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:12:06PM -0500, Brian Utterback wrote: >> On 01/04/11 13:44, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >>> It says and explains that minimum number of servers to detect one >>> falseticker is four, is that really corr

Re: [ntp:questions] [ntp:hackers] ntpdate removal is coming

2011-07-26 Thread Brian Utterback
ecause of bug 1044? -- blu Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding -------| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Corporation. Ph:6

Re: [ntp:questions] Fwd: Re: NetBSD GPS/PPS using 4.2.6p3

2011-08-25 Thread Brian Utterback
ent reason. -- blu Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding -------| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Cor

Re: [ntp:questions] Questions about joining pool.ntp.org

2011-08-28 Thread Brian Utterback
where you live. - Martin Golding -------| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Corporation. Ph:603-262-3916, Em:brian.utterb...@oracle.com ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] how long does it take ntpd to sync up

2011-08-28 Thread Brian Utterback
have occurred anyway. But in most cases, you are going to zero in on the right frequency pretty quickly. -- blu Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding -

Re: [ntp:questions] Questions about joining pool.ntp.org

2011-08-28 Thread Brian Utterback
On 08/28/11 11:23, David J Taylor wrote: > "Brian Utterback" wrote in message > news:4e5a2a83.6030...@oracle.com... > [] >> According to the FCC info, the problem is due to old GPS units not >> sufficiently filtering out the adjacent bands that were previousl

Re: [ntp:questions] ntpd keep trying preferred servers?

2011-09-07 Thread Brian Utterback
st practice of yesterday is now the shunned practice of today. -- blu Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding -------| Brian Utterback - Sola

Re: [ntp:questions] Magice Server Numbers: 4,5,7,9

2011-09-16 Thread Brian Utterback
ho ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding ---| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Corporation. Ph:603-262-3916, Em:brian.utterb...@oracle.com

Re: [ntp:questions] Google and leap seconds

2011-09-20 Thread Brian Utterback
-- blu Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding ---| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Corporation. Ph:603-262-3916, Em:brian.utterb...@oracle.com ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Google and leap seconds

2011-09-21 Thread Brian Utterback
olent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding -------| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Corporation. Ph:603-262-3916, Em:brian.utterb...@oracle.com ___ questions mailing list qu

Re: [ntp:questions] Google and leap seconds

2011-09-21 Thread Brian Utterback
. Somebody should get it repealed. -- blu Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding ---| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Corporat

Re: [ntp:questions] how to force NTP to use GPS

2012-02-11 Thread Brian Utterback
On 2/11/2012 5:19 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: I have the GPS server line set as prefer I think he already has. Brian Utterback ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Is a high-stratum falseticker possible? Complex configuration and unexpected result

2012-04-26 Thread Brian Utterback
e you live. - Martin Golding -------| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Corporation. Ph:603-262-3916, Em:brian.utterb...@oracle.com ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.nt

Re: [ntp:questions] [Thumbgps-devel] good paper on timing and delay

2012-05-23 Thread Brian Utterback
sychopath who knows where you live. - Martin Golding ---| Brian Utterback - Solaris RPE, Oracle Corporation. Ph:603-262-3916, Em:brian.utterb...@oracle.com ___ questions mailing list que

  1   2   3   >