Joe Gwinn wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
Joe Gwinn joegw...@comcast.net wrote:
We have a more direct diagnostic available
-- abruptly turn the background traffic off while observing
time slew with respect to a free-running rubidium.
Sure. As I said if you have a different
In article lh9fe1$plc$2...@dont-email.me, William Unruh
un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2014-03-30, Joe Gwinn joegw...@comcast.net wrote:
Magnus,
In article 53375aba.5070...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
On 24/03/14 14:38, Joe Gwinn wrote:
[snip]
On 24/03/14 14:38, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Magnus,
In article 532fa47b.7060...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 23/03/14 23:20, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Magnus,
In article 532e45db.5000...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org
Magnus,
In article 532fa47b.7060...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 23/03/14 23:20, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Magnus,
In article 532e45db.5000...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 21/03/14
Magnus,
In article 532e45db.5000...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 21/03/14 17:04, Joe Gwinn wrote:
[snip]
Will see if I can find Dave's reference.
I hit pay dirt yesterday, while searching for data on outliers in 1588
systems.
On 2014-03-23, Joe Gwinn joegw...@comcast.net wrote:
Magnus,
In article 532e45db.5000...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 21/03/14 17:04, Joe Gwinn wrote:
[snip]
Will see if I can find Dave's reference.
I hit pay dirt yesterday, while
Joe,
On 23/03/14 23:20, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Magnus,
In article 532e45db.5000...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 21/03/14 17:04, Joe Gwinn wrote:
[snip]
It is interesting. I've now read it reasonably closely.
The basic approach is to express
] Asymmetric Delay and NTP
Magnus,
In article 532b5ab9.4070...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 19/03/14 11:55, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article 5328aaa6.70...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
On 18/03/14 01:36
Magnus,
In article 532b5ab9.4070...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 19/03/14 11:55, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article 5328aaa6.70...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
On 18/03/14 01:36, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Joe,
On 19/03/14 11:55, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article 5328aaa6.70...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
On 18/03/14 01:36, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article 5327757e.5040...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Is that formal
Joe Gwinn wrote: What greatly helps is to have a LAN for the heavy
applications traffic, and a different LAN for NTP
and the like, forcing different paths in the OS
kernel to be taken.
If you see a difference, I would have though it more likely
to be different usage of the IP stacks
In article lgcoq8$b4j$1...@dont-email.me, E-Mail Sent to this address
will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
Joe Gwinn wrote: What greatly helps is to have a LAN for the heavy
applications traffic, and a different LAN for NTP
and the like, forcing
On 18/03/14 01:36, Joe Gwinn wrote:
In article 5327757e.5040...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 16/03/14 23:16, Joe Gwinn wrote:
I recall seeing something from Dr. Mills saying that a formal proof had
been found showing that no packet-exchange
Joe Gwinn wrote:
I recall seeing something from Dr. Mills saying that a formal proof had
been found showing that no packet-exchange protocol (like NTP) could
tell delay asymmetry from clock offset. Can anyone provide a reference
to this proof?
This is similar to Einstein's relativity
Joe,
On 16/03/14 23:16, Joe Gwinn wrote:
I recall seeing something from Dr. Mills saying that a formal proof had
been found showing that no packet-exchange protocol (like NTP) could
tell delay asymmetry from clock offset. Can anyone provide a reference
to this proof?
It's relative simple.
In article 5327757e.5040...@rubidium.dyndns.org, Magnus Danielson
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:
Joe,
On 16/03/14 23:16, Joe Gwinn wrote:
I recall seeing something from Dr. Mills saying that a formal proof had
been found showing that no packet-exchange protocol (like NTP) could
tell
I recall seeing something from Dr. Mills saying that a formal proof had
been found showing that no packet-exchange protocol (like NTP) could
tell delay asymmetry from clock offset. Can anyone provide a reference
to this proof?
Thanks,
Joe Gwinn
___
On 16/03/14 22:16, Joe Gwinn wrote:
I recall seeing something from Dr. Mills saying that a formal proof had
been found showing that no packet-exchange protocol (like NTP) could
tell delay asymmetry from clock offset. Can anyone provide a reference
to this proof?
I would have thought it was
On 2014-03-16, Joe Gwinn joegw...@comcast.net wrote:
In article lg5bug$682$1...@dont-email.me, David Woolley
david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 16/03/14 22:16, Joe Gwinn wrote:
I recall seeing something from Dr. Mills saying that a formal proof had
been found showing that no
19 matches
Mail list logo
